| name | check-discourse |
| description | Orchestrator — when the user wants to know "what do people say about X" (a provider, product, service, library, tool), pick which source-specific sub-skills to invoke and synthesize a balanced summary across them. Triggers on phrases like "what's the consensus on", "is X any good", "what are people saying about", "should I use X", "spec out a provider". |
Check Discourse (orchestrator)
TODO: Daniel will fill in detailed instructions.
Purpose
Decide which of the source-specific sub-skills in this plugin are worth running for the user's query, run them, then synthesize a single answer that distinguishes:
- recurring praise
- recurring complaints
- known failure modes / gotchas
- comparative alternatives people mention
Source selection heuristic (stub)
| Query shape | Likely sources |
|---|
| Dev tool / library / SaaS | Reddit, Hacker News, Lobsters, Stack Exchange |
| Consumer product / service | Reddit, Trustpilot, YouTube |
| Hosting / infra provider | Reddit (r/selfhosted, r/sysadmin), Hacker News, Trustpilot |
| Hardware / gear | Reddit, YouTube, Trustpilot |
| Programming problem / API quirk | Stack Exchange, Hacker News |
Output shape (stub)
- TL;DR — one-line consensus
- What people praise
- What people complain about
- Caveats / failure modes
- Sources consulted — links
