dispatch

name	dispatch
category	development-code
description	Delegate tasks to OpenAI Codex CLI and Google Antigravity CLI from Claude Code. Say 'check with codex' or 'ask gemini for a second opinion' and Claude runs the other agent, keeps a topic-aware session, and critiques the result.

Dispatch

Delegate tasks to external AI CLIs from inside Claude Code. Say "check with codex", "ask gemini for a second opinion", or "validate this before I merge" and Claude runs the other agent, keeps a topic-aware conversation, and critiques the result rather than echoing it.

Supports OpenAI Codex CLI and Google Antigravity CLI (multi-model: Gemini, Claude, GPT-OSS). No API keys — both CLIs use their own auth (OAuth / Google sign-in).

Source: sparklingneuronics/sparkling-skills (MIT)

When to Use This Skill

• Getting a second opinion from a different model family before merging
• Cross-checking Claude's analysis against Codex or Gemini
• Delegating a side task (research, review, image generation) to another CLI
• Triangulating a decision across multiple models and having Claude reconcile disagreements
• Resuming a prior delegation thread without restating context

What This Skill Does

1. Routes to the right CLI based on the tool you name — "codex" invokes Codex CLI, "gemini" or "agy" invokes Antigravity CLI
2. Picks sensible defaults — Codex: gpt-5.5, read-only sandbox; Antigravity: Gemini 3.5 Flash (or the model you name)
3. Synthesizes the result — Claude summarizes findings, states where it agrees or disagrees, and recommends next steps
4. Tracks topics — each delegation gets its own external session, resumed by ID on follow-ups

Examples

Second opinion on code

User: ask codex to review my uncommitted changes before I merge

Claude: [runs codex review --uncommitted, synthesizes findings]
        Codex flagged three things. I agree with #1 (missing null check)
        but #2 and #3 are false positives. Want me to fix the null check?

Cross-model challenge

User: ask gemini to challenge this architecture

Claude: [runs agy with Gemini 3.1 Pro, compares with own analysis]
        Gemini raises a valid concern about hot-partition risk that I
        hadn't flagged. Its other two points don't apply here.

Resume a thread

User: continue with codex — is the top issue real?

Claude: [resumes the same codex session with a delta bridge]
        Codex confirms the null-check issue — it traced the code path.

Requirements

• Claude Code (the plugin runs inside it)
• For Codex: codex CLI + codex login (OAuth)
• For Antigravity: agy CLI + Google sign-in (free account)

Install: claude install-plugin sparklingneuronics/sparkling-skills