Skip to main content

capture

Save a memory to Origin in flow. Active capture verb — use proactively when the user states a preference, makes a decision, corrects you, or shares a durable fact. Invoked as `/capture <content>`.

来源信息

仓库
davepoon/buildwithclaude
最近来源活动
2026年5月18日 01:47
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
3,565
分支
539

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
capture
description
Save a memory to Origin in flow. Active capture verb — use proactively when the user states a preference, makes a decision, corrects you, or shares a durable fact. Invoked as `/capture <content>`.
argument-hint
<content>
allowed-tools
["mcp__plugin_origin_origin__capture","mcp__plugin_origin_origin__recall","mcp__plugin_origin_origin__create_entity","mcp__plugin_origin_origin__create_relation","mcp__plugin_origin_origin__accept_revision","mcp__plugin_origin_origin__dismiss_revision","Bash"]
# /capture Capture a single memory in the moment. Active verb: agent captures the moment of insight, like a photograph. ## How to invoke Call the `origin` MCP server's `capture` tool with the user's content as a complete, self-contained statement. Attach `topic` from cwd or the conversation — don't make the user type it. ``` capture(content="<args, written as a full sentence with WHY>", memory_type="<picked from the 6 types>", entity="<primary entity name, if any>", space=<inferred>) ``` ### `memory_type` — agent picks one of 6 The daemon classifies when a local model or API key is configured. In local memory mode it does not, so the agent picks the type from the content itself. Use this mapping: | Type | Use for | |---|---| | `identity` | Durable facts about the user (role, company, language preference) | | `preference` | "I prefer X because Y" — a habit, a correction, a stylistic choice | | `decision` | "Going with A over B because C" — a specific choice with rationale | | `lesson` | Root cause found, workaround discovered, technical insight earned | | `gotcha` | Sharp edge, surprising behavior, a thing to watch out for | | `fact` | Durable info about people, projects, tools — anchor to `entity` when possible | If two types fit, pick the one closest to *why the memory matters*. A decision *also* implies a preference, but `decision` is more specific. ### `entity` — extract the anchor Pick the single most important named thing in the content: a person, project, tool, place. Use the exact name. Example: "Alice prefers TDD because…" → `entity="Alice"`. If the content has no named anchor, omit `entity`. ### `topic` / `space` inference - cwd inside a repo → repo name (e.g. `~/Repos/origin/...` → `"origin"`). - Outside any repo → most recent topic from the conversation, or omit. - Always pass `space` when scope is known; if uncertain, run `list_spaces` later (post-PR-C) or omit. ### Multiple entities or relations The MCP `capture` tool takes a single primary `entity`. For additional entities or relations, use the dedicated MCP tools. If the content names more than one entity, capture the memory first, then for each additional entity: ``` create_entity(name="<entity>", entity_type="<person|project|tool|place>") ``` For a relation between two entities: ``` create_relation(from_entity="<a>", to_entity="<b>", relation_type="<verb>") ``` Skip these calls when the daemon has an LLM — its post-ingest enrichment covers extraction. ## What to capture - Decisions: "Going with approach A because B" - Preferences: "Prefers TDD because catches regressions early" - Corrections: "Actually it's C, not D" - Identity / project facts: "Works on Origin, a local memory daemon for AI tools" ## What NOT to capture - System prompts, boot logs, heartbeats - Transient task state ("currently working on...") - Tool output, command results, architecture dumps - Single-word acknowledgments - Things the user can trivially re-derive (file paths, recent git history) ## Atomic ideas One capture = one idea. "Prefers TDD" and "Uses pytest" are two captures, not one. ## When to use - User explicitly says "remember this", "save that", "capture this". - User states a durable preference / decision / correction proactively (no ask required — that's the floor, not the trigger). ## When NOT to use - End of session bulk store → use `/handoff` (multi-item batch). - Pulling memories back out → use `/recall`. ## Post-capture contradiction signal After `capture` returns, check `response.triggered_revisions` and `response.auto_superseded`. ### auto_superseded (no action needed) If `auto_superseded` is non-empty, the daemon already resolved the contradiction. Surface it as informational: ``` Note: auto-superseded mem_X. Origin replaced a prior protected memory because trust=high and similarity > 0.9. No action needed. ``` No accept/dismiss call required. The revision was applied automatically. ### triggered_revisions (human review needed) If `triggered_revisions` is non-empty (and `auto_superseded` is empty), render an inline block to the user: ``` Stored mem_new. This capture topic-matches a protected memory now flagged for revision: - mem_target_abc Action: accept (replace original content) | dismiss (drop the revision) | leave (decide later) ``` Inline verb map: - accept: `accept_revision(target_source_id="mem_target_abc")` - dismiss: `dismiss_revision(target_source_id="mem_target_abc")` - leave: no call; surfaces again in next `/brief` Both fields can technically be non-empty in a single response (multiple protected matches), but in practice only one fires per capture: `auto_superseded` fires when trust=full and similarity > 0.9, `triggered_revisions` fires otherwise. If neither field is non-empty, the capture stored cleanly with no conflicts.
在 GitHub 查看