用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/Dev-Toolbelt/dev-team-agents --skill incident-response命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | incident-response |
| description | Incident response — severity, communication, mitigation, post-mortem. |
| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Complete outage — service unavailable for all users | Immediate | Site down, payments failing 100% |
| SEV2 | Major feature down — core functionality broken for most users | 15 min | Login broken, checkout not processing |
| SEV3 | Degraded performance — feature impaired or slow for a subset of users | 1 hour | Search slow, notifications delayed |
| SEV4 | Minor issue — cosmetic bug or edge-case failure with low impact | Next business day | UI glitch, rare error for <1% users |
#inc-2026-05-10-checkout)[SEV1 INCIDENT] - <short description>
Impact: <who is affected>
Status: Investigating
IC: @<name>
Next update: <time>
Repeat until service is restored:
Symptom → Hypothesis → Test → Mitigation → Verify
| Severity | Update Frequency | Channels |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Every 15 min | Status page + stakeholder channel + incident channel |
| SEV2 | Every 30 min | Status page + stakeholder channel |
| SEV3 | Hourly | Incident channel |
| SEV4 | On resolution | Ticket comment |
Update format:
[UPDATE - HH:MM] Impact: <current state> | Action: <what's being done> | ETA: <if known>
## Summary
One-paragraph description of the incident and its impact.
## Timeline
- HH:MM — event / action taken
- HH:MM — event / action taken
## Root Cause
What was the direct technical cause?
## Contributing Factors
- Infrastructure / config state that made this possible
- Process gaps that delayed detection or response
- Dependencies that were involved
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Fix X | @name | YYYY-MM-DD |
## What Went Well
- Detection was fast
- Rollback procedure worked as expected
When handing off an active incident to the next on-call: