用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill writing-plans命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Token-efficient tracking for AI orchestration. CLI-first for status updates (~50 tokens), agent fallback for complex ops (~1KB). Use when: updating task status, querying blockers, creating progress files, validating phases.
AshAi extension guidelines for integrating AI capabilities with Ash Framework. Use when implementing vectorization/embeddings, exposing Ash actions as LLM tools, creating prompt-backed actions, or setting up MCP servers. Covers semantic search, LangChain integration, and structured outputs.
This skill should be used when solving hard questions, complex architectural problems, or debugging issues that benefit from GPT-5 Pro or GPT-5.1 thinking models with large file context. Use when standard Claude analysis needs deeper reasoning or extended context windows.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | writing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code |
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans as: tickets tagged plan using todos_oneshot
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For you:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input):
return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
## Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
**"Plan complete and saved as ticket `<ticket-id>`. Two execution options:**
**1. Teams-Driven (parallel)** - Delegate tasks to workers via `teams delegate`, review between batches
**2. Sequential (this session)** - Execute tasks sequentially with checkpoints, using executing-plans skill
**Which approach?"**
**If Teams-Driven chosen:**
- Use `teams(action: 'delegate', tasks: [...])` to dispatch workers
- Review results between batches
**If Sequential chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:executing-plans
- Execute tasks sequentially with review checkpoints