favicon workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Generate favicons from a source image and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
favicon workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Generate favicons from a source image and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/favicon from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Generate a complete set of favicons from the source image at $1 and update the project's HTML with the appropriate link tags.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Prerequisites, Error Handling, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
You need to generate a complete favicon set from a single source image.
The task includes placing the assets in the correct framework-specific static directory and updating HTML link tags.
You want one workflow that validates the source image, detects the project type, and writes the right favicon outputs.
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Generate favicons from a source image.
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Operating Table
Situation
Start here
Why it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
Verify the source image exists at the provided path: $1
Check the file extension is a supported format (PNG, JPG, JPEG, SVG, WEBP, GIF)
If the file doesn't exist or isn't a valid image format, report the error and stop
Framework - Detection - Static Assets Directory
Rails - config/routes.rb exists - public/
Next.js - next.config.* exists - public/
Gatsby - gatsby-config.* exists - static/
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Step 1: Validate Source Image
Verify the source image exists at the provided path: $1
Check the file extension is a supported format (PNG, JPG, JPEG, SVG, WEBP, GIF)
If the file doesn't exist or isn't a valid image format, report the error and stop
Note whether the source is an SVG file - if so, it will also be copied as favicon.svg.
Imported: Step 2: Detect Project Type and Static Assets Directory
Detect the project type and determine where static assets should be placed. Check in this order:
Framework
Detection
Static Assets Directory
Rails
config/routes.rb exists
public/
Next.js
next.config.* exists
public/
Gatsby
gatsby-config.* exists
static/
SvelteKit
svelte.config.* exists
static/
Astro
astro.config.* exists
public/
Hugo
hugo.toml or config.toml with Hugo markers
static/
Jekyll
_config.yml with Jekyll markers
Root directory (same as index.html)
Vite
vite.config.* exists
public/
Create React App
package.json has react-scripts dependency
public/
Vue CLI
vue.config.* exists
public/
Angular
angular.json exists
src/assets/
Eleventy
.eleventy.js or eleventy.config.* exists
Check _site output or root
Static HTML
index.html in root
Same directory as index.html
Important: If existing favicon files are found (e.g., favicon.ico, apple-touch-icon.png), use their location as the target directory regardless of framework detection.
Report the detected project type and the static assets directory that will be used.
When in doubt, ask: If you are not 100% confident about where static assets should be placed (e.g., ambiguous project structure, multiple potential locations, unfamiliar framework), use AskUserQuestionTool to confirm the target directory before proceeding. It's better to ask than to put files in the wrong place.
Imported: Step 3: Determine App Name
Find the app name from these sources (in priority order):
Existing site.webmanifest - Check the detected static assets directory for an existing manifest and extract the name field
package.json - Extract the name field if it exists
Rails config/application.rb - Extract the module name (e.g., module MyApp → "MyApp")
Directory name - Use the current working directory name as fallback
Convert the name to title case if needed (e.g., "my-app" → "My App").
Check if the detected static assets directory exists. If not, create it.
Imported: Step 5: Generate Favicon Files
Run these ImageMagick commands to generate all favicon files. Replace [STATIC_DIR] with the detected static assets directory from Step 2.
Important: The -background none flag must come BEFORE the input file to properly preserve transparency when rendering SVGs. Placing it after the input will result in a white background.
If site.webmanifest already exists in the static directory, preserve the existing theme_color, background_color, and display values while updating the name, short_name, and icons array.
Imported: Step 7: Update HTML/Layout Files
Based on the detected project type, update the appropriate file. Adjust the href paths based on where the static assets directory is relative to the web root:
If static files are in public/ or static/ and served from root → use /favicon.ico
If static files are in src/assets/ → use /assets/favicon.ico
If static files are in the same directory as HTML → use ./favicon.ico or just favicon.ico
For Rails Projects
Edit app/views/layouts/application.html.erb. Find the <head> section and add/replace favicon-related tags with:
Layout file updated (or note if manual update is needed)
Note if any existing files were overwritten
Imported: Prerequisites
First, verify ImageMagick v7+ is installed by running:
which magick
If not found, stop and instruct the user to install it:
macOS: brew install imagemagick
Linux: sudo apt install imagemagick
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @favicon to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @favicon against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @favicon for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @favicon using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/favicon, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better.
Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
@devops-deploy - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@devops-troubleshooter - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@differential-review - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@discord-automation - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
Resource family
What it gives the reviewer
Example path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Error Handling
If ImageMagick is not installed, provide installation instructions and stop
If the source image doesn't exist, report the exact path that was tried and stop
If ImageMagick commands fail, report the specific error message
If the layout file cannot be found for HTML updates, generate files anyway and instruct on manual HTML addition
Imported: Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.