| name | deepfake-detection |
| description | Guides multimodal media authentication and deepfake forensics using provenance checks, metadata review, PRNU/noise analysis, temporal consistency, semantic forensics, and evidence reporting. Use when the user asks to verify images, audio, or video, investigate synthetic media, assess fake or manipulated content, or prepare a media authenticity report. |
| metadata | {"version":"1.2.0","origin":"webconsulting"} |
| license | MIT / CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
Deepfake Detection & Media Authentication
Source: https://github.com/dirnbauer/webconsulting-skills
Comprehensive framework for detecting synthetic media, analyzing manipulation artifacts, and establishing media provenance in the post-empirical era.
Key Insight: Traditional detection methods (PRNU, IGH, DQ) are like fingerprints—helpful, but disputable. Cryptographic provenance (C2PA) is like a DNA match—cryptographically secure (SHA-256, ~2¹²⁸ collision resistance).
When to Use
- Verifying authenticity of images or videos before publication
- Detecting AI-generated or manipulated media (deepfakes, face swaps, synthetic voices)
- Forensic analysis of suspicious media for legal or journalistic purposes
- Implementing automated media authentication pipelines
- Establishing content provenance and chain of custody
- Countering disinformation campaigns and Advanced Persistent Manipulators (APMs)
Related Skills
1. What Are Deepfakes?
Definition
Deepfakes are synthetic media created using deep learning techniques—primarily Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Diffusion Models, and Autoencoders—to generate or manipulate audiovisual content with a high degree of realism. The term combines "deep learning" and "fake."
Types of Synthetic Media
| Type | Technology | Description |
|---|
| Face Swap | Autoencoders, GANs | Replace one person's face with another in video |
| Face Reenactment | 3D Morphable Models | Animate a face with another person's expressions |
| Voice Clone | Text-to-Speech, Vocoder | Generate speech in someone's voice from text [20] |
| Lip Sync | Audio-to-Video | Make someone appear to say different words |
| Full Body Puppetry | Pose Estimation | Control a person's body movements |
| Fully Synthetic | Diffusion, GANs | Generate non-existent people, scenes, events |
Emerging Capabilities (2025-2026)
| Type | Advancement | Implication |
|---|
| Face Swap | One-shot swapping (single reference image), GHOST 2.0 [24], DynamicFace [25] | Minimal source material needed |
| Face Reenactment | Audio-driven animation, Neural Head Reenactment | Fully synthetic video calls |
| Voice Clone | Zero-shot cloning (no training on target), Emotional Voice Synthesis | Clone any voice instantly with emotion |
| Lip Sync | High-fidelity with Diffusion Models, Multilingual sync | Automatic dubbing across languages |
| Full Body Puppetry | 3D-aware motion transfer, Neural Body Avatars | Photorealistic real-time control |
| Fully Synthetic | Video Diffusion Models, Controllable Generation | Precise control over age, expression, gaze |
The Entertaining Side
Deepfakes have legitimate and creative applications:
| Use Case | Example | Value |
|---|
| Entertainment | De-aging actors in films, posthumous performances | Artistic expression |
| Satire & Parody | Political satire, comedy sketches | Free speech, humor |
| Education | Historical figures "speaking" in documentaries | Engagement, learning |
| Accessibility | Real-time sign language avatars | Inclusion |
| Gaming & VR | Personalized avatars, NPC faces | Immersion |
| Art & Expression | Digital art, creative projects | Innovation |
Example: The "This Person Does Not Exist" website showcases GAN-generated faces that fascinate users with the uncanny realism of non-existent people.
The Dangerous Side
The same technology enables serious harms:
| Threat | Description | Impact |
|---|
| Non-Consensual Imagery | Synthetic intimate content without consent | Psychological harm, harassment, reputation destruction |
| Political Manipulation | Fabricated speeches, fake scandals | Election interference, democratic erosion |
| Financial Fraud | CEO voice clones for wire transfer scams | Millions in losses per incident |
| Evidence Fabrication | Fake alibis, planted evidence | Obstruction of justice |
| Liar's Dividend | Dismissing real evidence as "deepfake" | Accountability evasion |
| Identity Theft | Bypassing facial recognition, KYC | Account takeover, fraud |
| Disinformation Warfare | State-sponsored synthetic media campaigns | Geopolitical destabilization |
Real Case (2024): WPP CEO Mark Read was targeted by a sophisticated deepfake voice clone attempting to authorize fraudulent transfers [19]. Deepfake fraud cases surged 1,740% in North America between 2022-2023, with average losses exceeding $500,000 per incident [18].
Current Scale (2025-2026)
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|
| Deepfakes shared annually | 8 million (2025) vs 500,000 (2023) | Industry estimates |
| Projected synthetic content | 90% of online content by 2026 | Europol |
| Non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII) | 98% of all deepfakes | EU Commission |
Key Insight: The exponential growth rate means detection systems face an ever-increasing volume challenge, reinforcing the need for proactive authentication (C2PA) over reactive detection.
The Future of Deepfakes
| Timeline | Development | Implication |
|---|
| Now (2026) | Real-time video deepfakes, commoditized tools | Anyone can create convincing fakes |
| Near Future | Interactive deepfakes in video calls | Trust in live communication erodes |
| Medium Term | Undetectable synthetic media | Detection becomes probabilistic, not binary |
| Long Term | "Reality-as-a-Service" | Authenticated media becomes the norm, unsigned content is suspect |
The Detection Arms Race
Recent research confirms the growing challenge of detection generalizability [1]:
Generation Quality: ████████████████████░░░░ 85% (2026)
Detection Accuracy: █████████████░░░░░░░░░░░ 55% (2026)
↑ Gap widening over time
Key Insight: We are transitioning from a world where "seeing is believing" to one where "cryptographic proof is believing." The future lies not in perfect detection, but in provenance infrastructure (C2PA v2.3) that proves authenticity at creation [15, 16]. Traditional detection methods (PRNU, IGH, DQ) are like fingerprints—helpful, but disputable. Cryptographic provenance (C2PA) is like a DNA match—cryptographically secure (SHA-256, ~2¹²⁸ collision resistance).
2. Strategic Context: The Post-Empirical Era
The Crisis of Empirical Evidence (2026)
The boundary between authentic and synthetic media has effectively vanished. Trillion-parameter models have commoditized the generation of photorealistic synthetic content, transforming deepfakes from isolated experiments into an industrialized disinformation capability.
The ABC Framework of Synthetic Media Threats
| Category | Description | Examples |
|---|
| A - Actors | Malicious generators of synthetic content | Nation-states, APMs (Advanced Persistent Manipulators), commercial disinformation services |
| B - Behavior | Deceptive patterns and tactics | Astroturfing with synthetic identities, coordinated inauthentic behavior |
| C - Content | The synthetic media itself | Deepfake videos, voice clones, GAN-generated faces, manipulated images |
The 4D Disinformation Tactics
| Tactic | Description | Forensic Counter |
|---|
| Dismiss | Claim real evidence is fake ("Liar's Dividend") | Provenance verification, cryptographic attestation |
| Distort | Reframe authentic events with synthetic fragments | Semantic consistency analysis |
| Distract | Flood with synthetic noise to obscure truth | Scale-resistant automated detection |
| Dismay | Psychological operations through synthetic threats | Confidence scoring, sensemaking support |
3. System Architecture
LLM Integration Strategy
The skill implements a hierarchical model structure for forensic analysis:
| Role | Model | Version | Function |
|---|
| Lead | Claude Opus | 4.5 | Complex synthesis of forensic data, multimodal analysis, report generation |
| Validation | Gemini Pro | 3.0 | Cross-validation of detection results, second opinion on edge cases |
| Reasoning | GLM Pro Thinking | 4.7 | Logical verification of causal chains, step-by-step reasoning for forensic conclusions |
Model Selection Rationale
- Claude Opus 4.5: Best-in-class for nuanced multimodal analysis and synthesizing complex forensic evidence into coherent reports
- Gemini Pro 3.0: Strong visual understanding for cross-validating image/video analysis results
- GLM Pro Thinking 4.7: Chain-of-thought reasoning for transparent forensic logic that can be audited
Architecture Requirements
- Asynchronous Processing Pipeline: Handle high token counts from multimodal analysis
- Vector Database for CRF Profiles: Store and query Camera Response Function signatures
- RAG Integration: Access forensic reference databases during inference
- Tool Integration: ffmpeg, ExifTool, ImageMagick for low-level signal processing
4. Required Tools & Installation
Tool Overview
| Tool | Purpose | Required |
|---|
ffmpeg | Video processing, frame extraction, audio isolation | Yes |
ffprobe | Metadata extraction, container analysis | Yes (bundled with ffmpeg) |
exiftool | Deep metadata extraction, EXIF/XMP/IPTC analysis | Yes |
imagemagick | Image processing, format conversion | Recommended |
jq | JSON processing for metadata analysis | Recommended |
c2patool | C2PA/CAI provenance verification | Optional |
Auto-Installation by Agent
When a required tool is missing, the agent will detect this and offer to install it. User approval is required before any installation.
🔧 Tool Missing: ffmpeg
The agent needs 'ffmpeg' for video frame extraction and analysis.
This tool is not currently installed on your system.
Would you like me to install it?
[macOS] brew install ffmpeg
[Ubuntu] sudo apt install ffmpeg
[Windows] winget install ffmpeg
⚠️ Approval required: Type 'yes' to proceed or 'no' to skip.
Manual Installation
macOS (Homebrew)
brew install ffmpeg exiftool imagemagick jq
brew install c2patool
Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt update
sudo apt install ffmpeg libimage-exiftool-perl imagemagick jq
curl -L https://github.com/contentauth/c2pa-rs/releases/download/c2patool-v0.26.65/c2patool-v0.26.65-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz | tar xz
sudo mv c2patool /usr/local/bin/
Windows (winget)
# Install all recommended tools
winget install ffmpeg
winget install exiftool
winget install imagemagick
winget install jqlang.jq
# Optional: C2PA verification tool (from GitHub releases)
# Download from: https://github.com/contentauth/c2patool/releases
Verification
ffmpeg -version
exiftool -ver
magick -version
jq --version
c2patool --version
Tool Usage Examples
ffmpeg for Feature Extraction
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "select='eq(pict_type,I)'" -vsync vfr frame_%04d.png
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vf "mpdecimate,setpts=N/FRAME_RATE/TB" -c:v libx264 dedup.mp4
ffprobe -v quiet -print_format json -show_format -show_streams input.mp4
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vn -acodec pcm_s16le -ar 44100 audio.wav
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -ss 00:01:30 -t 00:00:10 -c copy segment.mp4
ExifTool for Metadata Forensics
exiftool -json input.jpg | jq .
exiftool -Software -CreatorTool -HistorySoftwareAgent input.jpg
diff -y <(exiftool -g1 -a -u original.jpg) <(exiftool -g1 -a -u suspected.jpg)
exiftool -gps:all -c "%.6f" input.jpg
exiftool -time:all -G1 input.jpg
ImageMagick for Image Analysis
magick identify -verbose input.jpg
magick input.jpg -quality 95 ela_temp.jpg
magick composite input.jpg ela_temp.jpg -compose difference ela_output.jpg
magick input.jpg -resize 200% -resize 50% resample_test.jpg
C2PA Tool for Provenance
c2patool input.jpg
c2patool input.jpg -d
c2patool input.jpg --info
c2patool input.jpg --certs
c2patool input.jpg trust --help
C2PA Test Files for Validation
Official test files from the C2PA organization (CC BY-SA 4.0):
| File | Description | Expected Result |
|---|
adobe-20220124-C.jpg | Valid Adobe certificate, verified signature | ✅ Chain verified |
truepic-20230212-camera.jpg | Hardware-signed at capture | ✅ Chain verified |
| Files without credentials | No C2PA manifest | ⚠️ No provenance |
| Tampered files | Modified after signing | ❌ Invalid signature |
Source: c2pa-org/public-testfiles
Understanding C2PA Validation: The chain is verified step-by-step: (1) Certificate verified → (2) Signature valid → (3) Claims unchanged → (4) Image hash matches. One failure breaks the entire chain.
Detailed Reference
Read the full guide when the task needs detailed examples, long templates, troubleshooting matrices, appendices, or sections not included above. Keep this file unloaded for narrow tasks so the skill follows progressive disclosure.
