| name | strategic-scout |
| model | opus |
| description | Produces a scout document containing a stated tension, 3-5 distinct routes with tradeoffs, and a recommended direction with rationale — the first artifact in a four-step pipeline (scout → spec → prompts → commission). Use when: 'we do not know which direction to take', 'scout our options before we commit', 'what are the tradeoffs here', 'we are stuck between competing priorities', 'I need routes before writing a spec'. |
| category | strategic-thinking |
| triggers | ["we do not know which direction to take","scout our options before we commit","what are the tradeoffs here","we are stuck between competing priorities","I need routes before writing a spec"] |
| tier | 1 |
| agents | ["primary"] |
| tool_dependencies | ["file_system"] |
| inputs | [{"name":"tension","type":"string","description":"The strategic tension or decision point to scout routes for","required":true}] |
| outputs | [{"name":"scout_document","type":"ref","format":"cas-ref","description":"Scout document with stated tension, 3-5 distinct routes with tradeoffs, and recommended direction with rationale"}] |
Strategic Scout Skill
Version: 2.1
Created: 2026-02-07
Author: Manus AI
Purpose: To provide a structured, repeatable process for navigating strategic uncertainty, exploring multiple possible futures, and aligning on a clear, actionable plan.
I. The Philosophy: From Problem to Possibility
Strategic thinking is not about finding the right answer to a problem; it is about exploring the landscape of possibility that a tension reveals. This skill transforms the act of planning from a linear process of problem-solving to a creative process of possibility-seeking.
By beginning with a tension, scouting multiple routes, and continuously aligning on a shared vision, we can navigate uncertainty with clarity and confidence, and arrive at solutions that are both innovative and robust.
II. When to Use This Skill
- At the beginning of a new project or major release.
- When facing a significant strategic decision with no clear answer.
- When a project feels stuck or lacks a clear direction.
- When there are multiple competing priorities or stakeholder interests.
III. The Workflow
This is a 4-step workflow for strategic scouting and decision-making.
Step 1: Identify the Tension
Goal: To frame the strategic challenge as a tension to be held, not a problem to be solved.
- Articulate the Tension: Clearly state the core strategic challenge as a tension between two competing ideas (e.g., "feature lab vs. focused product").
- Hold the Question Open: Resist the urge to immediately choose a side or find a solution. The goal is to create a space for exploration.
Step 2: Scout Multiple Routes
Goal: To map the landscape of possibility by exploring multiple distinct paths forward.
- Generate 3-5 Routes: Use Scout mode to generate a diverse set of potential routes.
- Define Tradeoffs: For each route, clearly articulate the risk profile, potential impact, and estimated duration.
- Present the Options: Present the routes and their tradeoffs to the user for review and discussion.
Step 3: Synthesize and Refine
Goal: To create a hybrid approach that combines the best aspects of multiple routes.
- Gather Feedback: Actively listen to the user's feedback on the scouted routes.
