Review past MAUI DevFlow sessions. USE FOR: DevFlow friction reports, classifying `maui_tap`/`maui_hittest`/`maui_screenshot`/`maui_cdp_webviews` issues vs app bugs, markdown Environment/Findings reports, scrubbed dotnet/maui-labs issue drafts, workaround summaries. Does not run live `maui devflow`. DO NOT USE FOR: fixing bugs, onboarding, live debugging, or memory search.
Review past MAUI DevFlow sessions. USE FOR: DevFlow friction reports, classifying `maui_tap`/`maui_hittest`/`maui_screenshot`/`maui_cdp_webviews` issues vs app bugs, markdown Environment/Findings reports, scrubbed dotnet/maui-labs issue drafts, workaround summaries. Does not run live `maui devflow`. DO NOT USE FOR: fixing bugs, onboarding, live debugging, or memory search.
MAUI DevFlow Session Review
Use this skill to turn prior MAUI DevFlow-assisted AI sessions into opt-in
product feedback. The goal is not to fix bugs during the review; the goal is to
identify where DevFlow caused friction, what workarounds were tried, and what
outcome the agent eventually reached.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
reviewing previous AI sessions that used maui devflow
summarizing a long or stuck MAUI DevFlow debugging session
finding repeated failed attempts, retries, or workarounds around DevFlow tools
checking whether an advertised DevFlow feature did not work in practice
preparing a markdown feedback report for MAUI DevFlow maintainers
filing GitHub issues in dotnet/maui-labs from session evidence
another DevFlow skill suggested an optional post-session feedback review
When to Stop
The top actionable friction points are summarized with evidence, environment
metadata, attempts, workaround, and final outcome.
The markdown report is written or the requested GitHub issues are filed after
a PII scrub.
Remaining evidence would require scanning outside the user-approved scope.
The finding is too ambiguous to classify without more context; label it
unknown instead of continuing to mine private history.
Workflow
1. Confirm opt-in scope
If the user has provided session content directly in the message, start from
step 4 (Classify friction) immediately — do not invoke live DevFlow CLI commands,
search tools, or session history tools. The user has already supplied the evidence.
If no session content is provided, identify what the user wants reviewed:
current session
recent sessions matching MAUI DevFlow keywords
a date range, target platform, feature, command family, or app framework
sessions related to setup, connectivity, UI inspection, CDP, recording, logs,
network, storage, profiler, or DevFlow Actions
Do not scan unrelated session history. This skill is opt-in telemetry: the user
controls the scope and the output destination.
Do not ask the user for session IDs, transcript paths, log paths, artifact
paths, or other local identifiers. If a tool requires an internal handle to
inspect a session, use it only transiently and never include it in saved or
shared output.
If another DevFlow skill suggested this review, preserve the trigger context:
what challenge was stuck, which workarounds had already been tried, and whether
the user wants markdown-only output or GitHub issue filing.
MCP tools such as maui_wait, maui_list_agents, maui_status,
maui_tree, maui_query, maui_tap, maui_recording_start,
maui_recording_stop, maui_logs, maui_network, maui_cdp_*,
or maui_invoke_action
package and API names such as Microsoft.Maui.DevFlow.Agent,
Microsoft.Maui.DevFlow.Blazor, Microsoft.Maui.DevFlow.Agent.Gtk,
Microsoft.Maui.DevFlow.Driver, builder.AddMauiDevFlowAgent(),
or AddMauiBlazorDevFlowTools()
broker or port evidence such as 19223, 9223, adb reverse,
adb forward, agent registration, or direct port fallback
Start narrow and widen only when the first search does not find enough evidence.
advertised DevFlow features that failed or were unavailable
repeated attempts at the same command, selector, connection, or setup step
workaround chains that eventually succeeded
broker discovery, direct agent port, or Android forwarding loops
platform-specific setup, package, entitlement, or version mismatches
missing stable AutomationIds or missing observability that made DevFlow less
useful
AI-host or model behavior that misused DevFlow guidance
Separate confirmed DevFlow issues from app bugs, environment setup problems, and
unknown causes.
5. Capture attempts, workarounds, and outcome
For each finding, record:
symptom
sanitized evidence summary with no session IDs, file paths, usernames, machine
names, emails, private URLs, or other PII
attempts and retries, especially repeated or contradictory actions
workarounds tried
final outcome: unresolved, worked around, solved, or unknown
confidence level and why
Paraphrase private transcript content. Before sending, saving, or filing any
report, scrub PII and identifiers including names, emails, usernames, session
IDs, local file paths, machine names, private URLs, secrets, credentials, request
bodies, screenshots, and user-specific text.
6. Report or file issues
Use references/reporting.md. Default to a markdown
report. File GitHub issues only when the user asks and repository access works.
For markdown reports, include the exact sections ## Environment and
## Findings; put unknown environment details under ## Environment as
Unknown rather than omitting or guessing them.
For GitHub issues, prefer one issue per actionable MAUI DevFlow product problem.
Merge near-duplicate session evidence into the same issue body instead of
opening many low-signal issues.
Before saving markdown or filing issues, do a final privacy pass. If a useful
finding cannot be explained without PII or local identifiers, omit it or replace
the details with a generic description. Do not repeat the original private value
in the output, even to say that it was scrubbed; say only that local paths,
emails, private URLs, or other identifiers were redacted.
Optional Feedback Nudge
Other MAUI DevFlow skills may suggest this review when an agent has retried the
same DevFlow workflow several times, tried multiple workarounds, or finishes a
long DevFlow-assisted debugging session. That nudge should ask the user whether
they want an opt-in review; it should not run this skill automatically.
Critical Anti-Patterns
Do not
Do instead
Auto-scan all past sessions
Ask for scope and stay inside it
Ask for session IDs, transcript paths, log paths, or artifact paths
Ask for a high-level scope such as time range, platform, feature, or current session
Treat one ambiguous failure as a confirmed DevFlow bug
Label confidence and separate app/environment/unknown causes
Include raw private transcript excerpts, screenshots, tokens, file paths, session IDs, or request bodies, even in "removed PII" notes
Paraphrase safe evidence and say identifiers were redacted without repeating them
Fix the discovered issues during the review
Produce feedback unless the user separately asks for implementation
File GitHub issues without user approval and repo access
Produce markdown first, then file only on request
Hide successful workarounds
Capture the final working path and the failed attempts that led to it
