template-authoring

name	template-authoring
description	Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions. USE FOR: creating a reusable dotnet new template from an existing project, bootstrapping .template.config/template.json with correct identity, shortName, parameters, and post-actions, adding parameters or conditional content to a template you are authoring, validating the template.json you are authoring before publishing, packaging templates as NuGet packages for distribution. DO NOT USE FOR: validating an existing template.json as a standalone task (use template-validation), finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery and template-instantiation), MSBuild project file issues unrelated to template authoring, NuGet package publishing (only template packaging structure).
license	MIT

Template Authoring

This skill helps an agent create and validate custom dotnet new templates. It guides bootstrapping templates from existing projects and validates template.json files for authoring issues before publishing.

When to Use

• User wants to create a reusable template from an existing .csproj
• User wants to validate a template.json they are authoring before publishing
• User is setting up .template.config/template.json from scratch
• User wants to package a template for NuGet distribution

When Not to Use

• User wants to find or use existing templates — route to template-discovery or template-instantiation
• User has MSBuild issues unrelated to template authoring — route to dotnet-msbuild plugin

Inputs

Input	Required	Description
Source project path	For creation	Path to the .csproj to use as template source
template.json path	For validation	Path to an existing template.json to validate
Template name	For creation	Human-readable name for the template
Short name	Recommended	Short name for dotnet new <shortname> usage

Workflow

Step 1: Bootstrap from existing project

Analyze the source .csproj and create a .template.config/template.json:

1. Create .template.config directory next to the project
2. Generate template.json with identity (reverse-DNS), name, shortName, sourceName (project name for replacement), classifications, and tags
3. Preserve from source — generic dotnet new templates frequently get these wrong, so verify each is carried over from the original .csproj:
   1. SDK type — Microsoft.NET.Sdk, Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web, Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Worker, etc.
   2. Analyzer/package reference metadata — PrivateAssets, IncludeAssets, ExcludeAssets
   3. OutputType and other key properties — TreatWarningsAsErrors, Nullable, LangVersion
   4. CPM participation — no inline Version attributes when a Directory.Packages.props is present
   5. Custom build props/targets and Directory.Build.props conventions
   6. Repo conventions — folder layout, naming, global.json SDK pin

Minimal example:

{
  "$schema": "http://json.schemastore.org/template",
  "author": "MyOrg",
  "classifications": ["Library"],
  "identity": "MyOrg.Templates.MyLib",
  "name": "My Library Template",
  "shortName": "mylib",
  "sourceName": "MyLib",
  "tags": { "language": "C#", "type": "project" }
}

Required output — do not stop at a minimal stub. Write the complete .template.config/template.json for the actual source project, then emit a short conventions-preserved confirmation so the user can see nothing was silently dropped. This carry-over is the whole value of the skill; a generic dotnet new template that loses these is why authoring ties with a hand-written stub.

Source .csproj setting	Carried over?	How
SDK (Microsoft.NET.Sdk.*)	✅	template content .csproj uses same SDK
TreatWarningsAsErrors / Nullable / LangVersion	✅	preserved verbatim in template .csproj
PackageReference PrivateAssets / IncludeAssets / ExcludeAssets	✅	metadata kept on each reference
CPM (Directory.Packages.props present)	✅	no inline Version attributes emitted

Mark any row you intentionally omitted as ⚠️ with a reason — never leave it implicit.

Step 2: Validate template.json

Validate the generated template.json using the template-validation skill (it owns the full rule set — required fields, identity format, reserved shortName conflicts, parameter datatypes, post-actions, constraints, and tags).

Quick summary of what gets checked:

• Required fields — identity, name, and shortName must be present.
• ShortName conflicts — avoid names that collide with dotnet new subcommands. Read the authoritative set from the Commands: section of dotnet new --help for the installed SDK and do not hardcode it (it can change between versions); illustrative examples from current SDKs are install, uninstall, update, list, search, details, create. A conflict happens because dotnet new <name> would be parsed as the subcommand of the same name. Top-level dotnet verbs like build, run, test, and publish do NOT conflict. Run dotnet new list to confirm the name is not already taken.
• Parameters, post-actions, tags — see template-validation for the complete rules, including the valid datatype list.

Step 3: Refine the template

Based on validation results and user requirements:

1. Add parameters with appropriate types (string, bool, choice), defaults, and descriptions
2. Add conditional content using #if preprocessor directives for optional features
3. Configure post-actions for solution add, restore, or custom scripts
4. Set constraints to restrict which SDKs or workloads the template supports
5. Add classifications and tags for discoverability

Step 4: Test the template locally

dotnet new install ./path/to/template/root
dotnet new mylib --name TestProject --dry-run
dotnet new mylib --name TestProject --output ./test-output
dotnet build ./test-output/TestProject

Validation

• template.json passes manual validation with zero errors
• Template identity and shortName are unique and meaningful
• All parameters have descriptions and appropriate defaults
• Template can be installed, dry-run, and instantiated successfully
• Created projects build cleanly with dotnet build
• Conditional content produces correct output for all parameter combinations

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall	Solution
Identity format issues	Use reverse-DNS format (e.g., MyOrg.Templates.WebApi). Avoid spaces or special characters.
ShortName conflicts with CLI commands	Avoid names that match a dotnet new subcommand; read the live set from dotnet new --help and don't hardcode it (illustrative examples: install, uninstall, update, list, search, details, create). Top-level verbs like build/run/test/publish are fine. Run dotnet new list to see if the name is already taken.
Missing parameter descriptions	Every parameter should have a description and displayName for discoverability.
Not testing all parameter combinations	Use dotnet new <template> --dry-run with different parameter values to verify conditional content works correctly.
Hardcoded versions in template	Use sourceName replacement for project names and consider parameterizing framework versions.
Not setting classifications	Add appropriate classifications (e.g., ["Web", "API"]) for template discovery.

More Info

• Custom templates for dotnet new — official authoring guide
• template.json reference — full schema reference
• Template Engine Wiki — template engine internals