Skip to main content

deep-review

Deep review — the full weekly review. Process all inboxes to zero, audit projects and areas, get creative. ~30 min. Use when: 'deep review', 'weekly review', 'full review'.

来源信息

仓库
emcodeio/weave
最近来源活动
2026年4月12日 00:35
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
2
分支
1

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
deep-review
description
Deep review — the full weekly review. Process all inboxes to zero, audit projects and areas, get creative. ~30 min. Use when: 'deep review', 'weekly review', 'full review'.
disable-model-invocation
true
# Deep Review (~30 min) You are running the user's deep review — the full weekly review. This has three phases. Take each phase conversationally — present findings and options, don't rush. The user drives decisions. This is the ONLY session that processes inboxes to zero. --- ## Phase 1: Get Clear Process ALL inboxes to zero. ### 1. Process capture inboxes (Drafts + Obsidian) Run `/process-inbox` — unified scan-classify-confirm-execute workflow for both Drafts inbox and Obsidian `Inbox/`. Claude scans all items, auto-classifies, groups by action type, presents a numbered summary, user confirms/overrides, then Claude executes in batch. See that skill for the full three-pass workflow. ### 2. Process email inbox Scan unread emails using `mcp__mail__get_emails` (unread, limit 25). Group by actionability: - **Needs response** → Offer to draft a reply via `mcp__apple-mail__create-draft` - **Contains action item** → Capture to project or `[[Action Pool]]` - **Reference worth keeping** → Capture to vault - **Newsletter/FYI** → Mark as read or defer ### 3. Scan daily notes ``` obsidian search query="path:Daily/" vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" limit=7 ``` Check this week's daily notes for uncaptured items, friction patterns, energy/mood trends. ### 4. Physical inbox prompt Ask: "Anything in your physical space that needs capturing?" --- ## Phase 2: Get Current ### 6. Audit active projects Search for all notes with `categories: ["[[Projects]]"]` and `status: active`. For each project: - Are there unchecked actions that still make sense? - Has the project stalled? (No completions + not modified in 30+ days) - **Friction detection**: Actions appearing across multiple reviews without progress? Surface the pattern. - Should any projects be completed or moved to `status: someday`? ### 7. Audit Action Pool Read `[[Action Pool]]`. Friction detection on standalone actions — items sitting across multiple reviews without progress. ### 8. Daily note retrospective Read this week's daily notes (from Phase 1's daily note scan, or re-read via `obsidian search query="path:Daily/" vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" limit=7`). For each day, compare `## Today's Options` against `## Done Today`: - **Carried but never done**: Items that appeared in Today's Options across multiple days but never made it to Done Today. These are friction signals — misalignment between intention and energy/context. - **Energy/mood correlation**: Cross-reference `energy` and `mood` frontmatter with completion patterns. Do certain action types only get done on high-energy days? - **Emerging patterns**: Actions from the same project or area repeatedly deferred suggest systemic friction, not individual laziness. Surface findings conversationally: "I noticed X appeared three times this week but never got done — is something blocking it, or has the purpose shifted?" ### 9. Audit areas Read area notes in `Notes/`. Check each area for neglected responsibilities. Surface leisure collection notes gently as options. ### 9a. Defense pattern review (Tier 2) Weekly scan of shadow pattern activity. Read this week's daily note `## Observations` sections and gather any pattern-related notes. Present a brief summary: - Patterns that appeared this week (with frequency and domain) - Contradictions detected (pattern didn't fire when expected) — celebrate these - Any new patterns not yet documented - Friction patterns from Step 8's daily note retrospective that map to documented defense triggers If contradictions were detected, append them to the user's defense pattern document `### Contradictions` section. If a new undocumented pattern emerged, flag it: "This pattern isn't documented yet — worth adding?" ### 10. Calendar review Read **past week** and **upcoming week** from Apple Calendar using `mcp__apple-events__calendar_events`. Note: - Follow-ups needed from past events - Upcoming commitments that need preparation - Schedule conflicts to flag ### 11. Day-specific routine review Read full `[[Day-Specific Routines]]`. Ask: "Are these still working? Anything to add, remove, or adjust?" ### 12. Day-specific actions Surface today's items from `[[Day-Specific Routines]]` (e.g., "Balance finances" on Friday). ### 13. Vault health Run vault health checks: ```bash obsidian orphans vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" obsidian deadends vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" obsidian unresolved vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" ``` Optionally dispatch the **vault-organizer** agent for structural health and the **contradictions-resolver** agent for semantic consistency. Review orphans for any that should be connected to existing areas or categories. ### 14. Workbench check Search for all notes in `Workbench/` (`obsidian search query="path:Workbench/" vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}"`): - **Ready to integrate** (`status: ready`): Present list, offer `/integrate-workbench` for each - **Stale** (unchanged 30+ days, `status: drafting`): "These workbench items haven't been touched in 30+ days: [list]. Still active work, ready to integrate, or safe to delete?" - **Paused** (`status: paused`): Mention count only — intentionally on hold - Report total workbench count This is a review checkpoint — the user decides what to do with each item. --- ## Phase 3: Get Creative ### 15. Someday review Read `[[Someday Pool]]` and any projects with `status: someday`. Use `mcp__qmd__query` to find connections between someday items and active projects — a `vec` search may surface relevant context. Also check leisure collection notes. ### 16. Rule of 3 Help the user pick **three desired outcomes** for the coming week — what would make the week feel successful? ### 17. Celebrate wins Ask about this week's accomplishments. Acknowledge progress and completed projects. ### 18. Ontological remodeling Ask: "Are your current project and area categories working well? Anything that should be merged, split, or reframed?" Use `mcp__qmd__query` to check for conceptual overlaps. --- ## After the review Summarize: - Inbox status (should be zero) - Project health overview (active count, stalled, completed) - Rule of 3 outcomes for the week - Items that need attention Commit all vault changes.
在 GitHub 查看