- name
- neqsim-continuous-task-improvement
- description
- Living tasks and continuous task solving with NeqSim (neqsim task-living/task-cycle/task-solve/task-resume/task-update/task-backtest/task-schedule/task-promote/task-report/task-ledger). USE WHEN: a solved task must keep improving daily or on events, resume from persisted state, detect technical-evidence changes and selectively rerun affected calculations, reopen on new data or a changed brief, backtest monitoring, or issue a reviewed Final Report.
- last_verified
- 2026-10-08
# Continuous Task Improvement (Living Tasks)
A normal task ends with a report. A **living task** keeps a `continuous/` folder
next to the normal three steps and is improved by **cycles**: small, resumable,
auditable runs that pull new evidence, recompute KPIs, detect drift, update an
improvement ledger and — only on a trigger — ask an agent to look. The engineer
promotes a reviewed cycle to the new baseline. Nothing in the old task changes.
Principle: **program the loop, prompt the exceptions.** The runner makes no LLM
calls; agents run only when a trigger fires; people decide.
## When to use
| Need | Command |
|------|---------|
| Keep a finished task up to date (daily, on a server or on demand) | `task-living` then `task-schedule --install` |
| Solve until the goal is met, or until improvement is marginal | `task-solve --until goal` / `--until converged` |
| Resume after closing VS Code, rebooting or changing machine | `task-status <task>` then `task-resume <task>` |
| Reassess after a datasheet, drawing, standard, measurement or model changes | `task-status <task>` then `task-update <task>` |
| Issue a reviewed standalone Word/HTML delivery | Promote the validated cycle, then `task-report <task> --final --reviewer NAME` |
| Start from a Word/Markdown brief | `neqsim new-task "title" --prompt-file brief.docx` then `task-living` |
| Prove a monitor finds the faults it should (and no others) | `task-backtest --start ... --end ...` |
| Try everything without company data | `task-reference-case <folder>` |
All commands run through the shared interpreter:
`<python-executable> devtools/neqsim_cli.py task-<command> ...` (or `neqsim task-<command>`).
`<task>` may be a path or a folder name inside the task root (`neqsim --show-task-root`);
`task-status` and `task-reference-case` default to the task root when no folder is given.
## Workflow
1. **Make it living** (never overwrites):
```bash
neqsim task-living <task> --brief brief.docx
```
Creates `continuous/cycle_plan.yaml`, a draft `goal.yaml` compiled from the
brief, `baseline/` from `results.json` key results, a ledger seeded from
`recommendations`, and a `continuous:` block in `study_config.yaml`.
2. **Edit the plan** — sources (adapter + options), scripts (task-local stage
functions), KPIs, drift signals, triggers, stages, solve settings, backtest
expectations. See the template written by `task-living`.
3. **Confirm the goal** — fill `objective.metric/direction/target` and set
`confirmed_by`. `task-solve` refuses an unconfirmed goal
(`--allow-unconfirmed` for experiments only).
4. **Backtest before scheduling** — replay archived data with a simulated clock:
```bash
neqsim task-backtest <task> --start 2025-10-02 --end 2026-09-30 --repeat
```
Report: detected / missed expected events, delay, false alarms per month,
reproducibility. Written to `continuous/backtests/<run>/`; live state is untouched.
5. **Resume before starting fresh work** — `neqsim task-status <task>` is the
five-second persisted view. If it reports resumable work, run
`neqsim task-resume <task>`. The task folder, not prior chat, is authoritative.
6. **Process evidence changes** — map evidence globs to affected stages and conclusions under
`evidence.rules` (`match`, `stages`, affected `kpis`, and `conclusions`); use
`neqsim task-update <task>`. Mapped changes rerun only the affected stages and declared
dependencies while invalidating affected KPIs and retaining unaffected ones. An unmapped path fails
closed to the full plan.
7. **Run cycles** — `neqsim task-cycle <task>` (monitor) or schedule it:
`neqsim task-schedule <task> --daily 05:00 --install` (Windows Task Scheduler;
the `cron` line is printed for Linux servers).
8. **Review and promote** — read `continuous/LIVING_REPORT.md` (the always-current
view) and `cycles/<id>/digest.md`, decide ledger items
(`task-ledger <task> set OPP-0002 accepted --by NAME`), then
`neqsim task-promote <task> <cycle-id> --reviewer NAME`.
9. **Finalize explicitly** — only after the accepted result is promoted and evidence is current,
run `neqsim task-report <task> --final --reviewer NAME`. This uses the canonical Task Solver
generator and writes an immutable `FR-###` Word/HTML delivery plus hashes and audit references.
## Living report (always up to date)
`continuous/LIVING_REPORT.md` (+ `continuous/report/kpi_trends.png`) is rewritten
automatically after `task-living`, every live cycle and solve round, `task-solve`,
`task-backtest`, `task-promote`, a reopen and every `task-ledger set/merge`. It shows:
- the state, the stop reason, the goal and the baseline;
- the latest value of every KPI against the baseline;
- the solve rounds;
- the KPI trends;
- the trigger events;
- the ledger with its pending decisions;
- the baseline history and the backtests;
- the next actions.
It is a view built from the folder — never edit it; `neqsim task-report <task>` rebuilds it.
A report failure is logged and never fails the cycle.
The formal Word/HTML report (`neqsim report`) follows the plan's `report.formal`:
`never` (default), `on_promote` (recommended: the formal report always matches the
promoted baseline) or `every_cycle`. `task-report <task> --formal` forces it once.
Do not confuse the four views: `task-status` is the five-second operational summary;
`continuous/LIVING_REPORT.md` is regenerated history/change detail; `neqsim report` is the
ordinary current-best engineering report; and `task-report --final --reviewer NAME` creates an
immutable standalone delivery. A Final Report contains no transient cycle narrative, only a
short record pointing to the Living Report, ledger, promoted cycle and `WORK_RECORD.md`.
Promotion merges the cycle's KPIs over the previous baseline, so promoting a solve
round (which reports only the objective) keeps the baseline of the monitored KPIs.
## Folder layout
```
continuous/
cycle_plan.yaml goal.yaml state.json watermarks.json drift_state.json
kpi_history.csv LOCK (while a cycle runs)
LIVING_REPORT.md report/kpi_trends.png always-current view (rebuilt, never edited)
final_report.json current immutable Final Report pointer
final_reports/FR-###.json retained finalization revisions
baseline/ baseline.json, kpis.json, results_snapshot.json, history/<id>/
evidence/ inventory.json: accepted task-relative SHA-256 provenance
ledger/events.jsonl append-only; merge between hosts by event_id
stages/*.py task-local stage scripts
data/<source>/YYYY/MM/part_*.csv pulled evidence
cycles/<YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMZ@host>[-rN]/ cycle.json, kpis.json, triggers.json, digest.md, ...
backtests/<run>/ isolated replay state + backtest_report.{json,md}
```
## Stop rules (solve loop)
States: `goal_met` (validated, required confidence), `infeasible` (reachable
upper bound below target), `blocked` (only person-dependent actions left),
`budget_exhausted`, `converged` (window gains below
`max(absolute, relative·|J|)` **and** the best candidate's net expected
improvement `p·Δ − cost` ≤ 0). After any stop the task enters **monitoring** and
reopens on regression (`regress_margin`), `new_evidence`, `brief_changed`,
`neqsim_changed` or a reviewer request.
## Writing a stage script
```python
def run(ctx):
rows = ctx.new_rows.get("station", []) # rows pulled this cycle
kpi = ... # compute with NeqSim if needed
return {"kpis": {"polytropic_efficiency": kpi},
"proposals": [{"title": "...", "category": "maintenance"}],
"solve": {"value": v, "validated": True, "confidence": "high",
"upper_bound": ub, "candidates": [{"action": "...",
"p_success": 0.7, "predicted_delta": 0.3}]}}
```
Register in the plan: `scripts: {station_model: {file: continuous/stages/x.py, function: run}}`
and add `script:station_model` to `stages`. Use NeqSim through
`ProcessAutomation.evaluate()` / `getUtilizationSnapshot()` inside the script;
keep the heavy model in the script, not in the plan.
## Drift detection
EWMA + two-sided CUSUM on a frozen warm-up baseline, `confirm` consecutive
values to alarm. **Always set an engineering floor** (`min_sigma`) per signal:
a 30-sample baseline underestimates σ and white noise alone gives false alarms
within months. On the reference case, floors of 0.002 (efficiency), 0.5 %
(meter mismatch), 0.2 bar (pressure) give 3/3 detections and 0 false alarms.
```yaml
drift:
signals:
polytropic_efficiency: {min_sigma: 0.002}
settings: {lambda: 0.2, L: 3.5, k: 0.5, h: 6.0, warmup: 30, confirm: 2}
```
Step and criterion triggers (`triggers.kpi_step`, `triggers.criteria: {kpi: "< 0.785"}`)
fire on **crossing**, so a persistent state raises one trigger, not one per day.
## Production optimisation loop (advisory)
`neqsim task-living <task> --template production` writes a plan, a goal with constraints and an empty
`continuous/user_input.yaml`. Stages, in order: `sense`, `inputs`, `script:model_update` (live data into the
model, run, residual KPIs), `script:optimize` (search, returns `proposals`), `kpis`, `gates`, `constraints`,
`guard`, `drift`, `goal`, `diff`, `outcome`, `ledger`, `digest`, `notify`. The loop is advisory: it never
writes to a control system and every proposal carries `requires_approval`.
- **Levers**: by default every operator-adjustable parameter is a lever; the plan lists them under
`production.levers`. The task-local `optimize.py` of the Snorre A reference task supports three kinds:
`separator_pressure`, `well_rate` (choke opening: scales a manifold feed at constant GOR/water cut; assumes the
reservoir and tubing deliver it, so proposals carry `needs_well_check`) and `equipment_setpoint` (any
unit-operation setter: `{tag, setter, getter, unit, step, lo, hi}`; not yet run on a real model, so check the
getter and setter signatures first). Bounds are the operating-experience
envelope. Each lever is stepped both ways, positive moves are then simulated together (moves interact, so the
gains are not summed). Call `lever_limits(ctx, name, lo, hi)` so user restrictions apply.
- **Gates** (`gates:` in the plan: `{name, kpi, abs_max|max|min}`): no advice while the model residuals,
mass balance, input age or live-data flag are outside limits. A missing KPI fails the gate.
- **Constraints** (`constraints:` in `goal.yaml`: `{name, kpi, op, limit, margin, warn, hard, source}`):
`margin` tightens the limit (use the lab-vs-model scatter for a product spec; for equipment use
`demonstrated_limit(history, quantile, design)` = larger of design and experience). A hard constraint
with no `limit` is **unconfirmed** and withholds all advice. Slack becomes the KPI `slack_<name>`.
- **Proposals** must carry finite numeric `setpoints`, `expected_gain`, `predicted` (a value for every
hard-constrained KPI), and `optimizer_evidence`. Evidence must name the current `ctx.cycle_id` and set
`simulation_converged`, `candidate_feasible`, `candidate_finite`, `constraint_evidence_complete`, `state_restore_complete`,
`accepted_point_replayed`, and `actions_complete` to exactly `true`. The `guard` fails closed on missing,
stale, non-finite, unconverged, partially restored/replayed, incomplete-constraint, or partially applied
candidates. It keeps only proposals that also satisfy every hard constraint with margin; every rejection is
listed in `guard.json`. Also record a positive integer `evaluation_count` and finite non-negative
`runtime_seconds`; the ledger retains the evidence block for persistent incumbent and performance provenance.
Field studies can set `production.require_envelope_evidence: true` and attach the Java
`getAcceptedPointEnvelopeEvidence(...)` map as `accepted_point_envelope_evidence`. The guard requires exact
cycle/optimizer identity, action-id/setpoint binding, complete uniquely addressed slices, safe recovery of every
sampled point, and reconciled point/evaluation/runtime totals before the existing ledger persists it. A supplied
block is always validated even when the setting is false; never copy envelope evidence into a later cycle.
Map production/injection route line-ups, controlled reservoir-lifecycle boundaries, mapped rotating-equipment
power, common-shaft speed/power, driver limits, shared host-power limits, and other operating-limit files to
`guard` with dependencies on the model update, optimizer, gates, and constraints. Keep route selectors as process
actions, reservoir pressure as a model input owned by `WellFlow.ReservoirLayer`, and mapped equipment power as
solved evidence read from the canonical `ProcessModel.getPower(...)` path. On a detected relevant revision
the append-only ledger marks old validation evidence non-current
and supersedes unfinished advice during the evidence stage, before model/optimizer/guard work can fail. A failed
guard still blocks publication of new advice, but cannot leave the old item marked current. Retry and resume
preserve idempotent invalidation and the current cycle's already-persisted replacement; dry runs do not mutate the
ledger. Custom production plans must keep `evidence` before model update, optimization, and `guard` to retain this
failure-path guarantee. Only a newly guarded point becomes a separate
`proposed` item with `revalidation_of`; if no safe replacement exists, expose none and never retain stale advice.
When a later revision is safe, resume lineage from the most recent superseded item rather than silently starting
a disconnected incumbent.
- **Outcome**: ledger items set to `implemented` with `objective_kpi` and `baseline_value` are compared with
the realised gain each cycle (`outcome_confirmed` / `outcome_miss`); the engineer decides on `verified`.
- **Boundary conditions**: read the measured process boundary (here gas export and injection pressure and
temperature, via `production.gas_tags`) every cycle as KPIs `<name>_meas`, with `<name>_model`/`_resid`
when the model has the counterpart, so a model that drifts from the boundary is visible.
### Comments and restrictions from the engineers
The engineer can steer the loop between cycles without touching code. Entries live in
`continuous/user_input.yaml`; the `inputs` stage reads them first in every cycle, applies the effects,
prints them in the digest and the living report, and raises `user_input:<id>` once when an entry is new or
changed (`user_input_expired:<id>` when it expires). Add, list and resolve with the CLI:
```text
neqsim task-note <task> "Vigdis HP choke limited by sand, max +5 %" --lever "Vigdis HP wells" --hi 5 --by NAME
neqsim task-note <task> "Spec is 0.70 bara RVP per lab" --constraint rvp_spec --kpi export_rvp_bara --limit 0.70 --margin 0.05
neqsim task-note <task> "Keep 3rd stage fixed during the trial" --freeze "20D-VA60 3rd stage" --expires 2026-11-01
neqsim task-note <task> "Lab bias measured" --setting production.rvp_bias_bara=0.05
neqsim task-note <task> --list # or --resolve U-001 --by NAME
```
Effects: `lever_bound` (replaces the plan bounds, so it can also widen), `lever_freeze`, `constraint`
(sets or adds a goal constraint, which also confirms an unset limit), `setting` (dotted plan key) and `gate`.
A note with no effect is free text that the digest and the agent see. Resolve an entry to stop its effects;
the file is the audit trail, so do not delete entries.
## Plugins (public-first)
Entry-point groups `neqsim_continuous.adapters`, `.stages`, `.notifiers`.
Built in: adapter `file` (CSV drop folder); notifiers `file`, `smtp`/`email`,
`webhook`/`teams` (secrets only via `*_env` variable names). Community packages
add generic adapters (tagreader) and optimizers; enterprise packages add site
adapters (OTS, PDM, …). A missing plugin gives source status `not_installed`
and a **degraded** cycle — never a crash.
## Gotchas
- Cycle ids are UTC; a rerun in the same minute gets `-r2`. Use
`task-resume` for crashed/interrupted work: it keeps the original cycle id across
later days/hosts, skips completed stages, restores completed side-effect metadata,
在 GitHub 查看