一键导入
agent-interaction-insights
Analyze agent transcripts and traces to recommend collaboration improvements and generate decision-oriented HTML reports.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Analyze agent transcripts and traces to recommend collaboration improvements and generate decision-oriented HTML reports.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Generate semantic flamegraphs from local AI agent sessions using agentpprof with iterative tag rule development.
Analyze AgentSight system evidence to recommend operational improvements for agent runs.
| name | agent-interaction-insights |
| description | Analyze agent transcripts and traces to recommend collaboration improvements and generate decision-oriented HTML reports. |
| when_to_use | Use when the user asks to analyze agent sessions, reduce corrections, improve trust, stop retry loops, compare agents, or generate insights from Claude/Codex/Gemini logs, OTel spans, or LangSmith/Langfuse exports. |
Turn agent conversation and trace evidence into concrete next-run improvements: prompts, AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, workflow, validation rules, tool policy, or task routing. Lead with what should change; use evidence to justify the change. Default reports should read like decision material for an agent owner.
Privacy mode: Default to team-share. Read references/privacy-modes.md before extracting prompt/response/path/command/header/secret-adjacent data. For HTML reports and examples, use reader-safe summaries: short task/claim summaries, field categories, time ranges, counts, statuses, and analysis boundaries. Exact local identifiers belong only in private-debug work requested by the user.
Classify the question:
improve-collaboration: reduce corrections, clarify framing, improve AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md.improve-trust: make summaries and validation claims reliable.reduce-waste: stop loops, retry churn, token/time waste.improve-workflow: decide which instructions, checks, evals, policies, or workflow gates should change.compare-fit: compare agents, models, prompts, or task classes.Route evidence to reference docs:
references/data-source-routing.mdreferences/improvement-classes.mdreferences/common-evidence-model.mdreferences/friction-taxonomy.mdreferences/handoff-contract.mdreferences/report-shapes.mdreferences/example-patterns.mdIf the user provides both interaction logs and AgentSight/system data, analyze only interaction evidence here. Consume already summarized system findings as compact context; route raw AgentSight data to agentsight-system-friction.
Build facts:
Recommend improvements:
Shape output:
agentsight-system-friction when AgentSight data is available.Always include:
Use redacted summaries by default.
For HTML reports, translate internal terms before writing: "system summary" for cross-boundary evidence, "single-page report" for the output, "analysis boundary" for scope, and category labels for local identifiers.
Analyze my last 20 Claude and Codex sessions. Where did the agents waste time and where should I improve AGENTS.md?
Use this Langfuse export to tell me whether the agent really validated the PR.
Generate a self-contained HTML report from these agent interaction findings, without raw prompts.