菜单
Root-cause discipline for bugs, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Embedded grill on the hypothesis before writing fix code. Use when encountering any bug, failing test, or behavior that doesn't match expectation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Single entry-point orchestrator for the entire EvanFlow loop. The user says "let's evanflow this", "use evanflow", "evanflow this idea", "run this through evanflow", "implement with evanflow", or any similar phrasing — and you walk the full loop (brainstorm → plan → execute → tdd → iterate → STOP) end-to-end, announcing each step, respecting checkpoints, and stopping where the user retains control. Trigger keywords: "evanflow", "let's evanflow", "use evanflow", "evanflow this".
Meta skill for the EvanFlow system. Loads the shared vocabulary (deep modules, deletion test, vertical slice, grill, mockup quick-mode, no-auto-commit) and describes when to invoke each evanflow-* skill. Use when starting a new task and unsure which evanflow skill applies, or when you need to ground reasoning in the shared vocabulary.
Vertical-slice TDD for any production code. One test → one impl → repeat. Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not internals. Use when implementing any feature, bugfix, or behavior change.
Clarify intent, propose 2-3 approaches, embedded grill to stress-test the chosen path. Use before any creative work — new features, components, behavior changes, design questions. Mockup-only requests use mockup quick-mode (no spec/plan ceremony).
Orchestrate parallel implementation with coder/overseer pairs. Coders implement decomposed tasks using evanflow-tdd; overseers review each coder's output for bugs, gaps, errors, AND cohesion violations against a shared contract. A final integration overseer checks cross-coder cohesion. Use for plans with 3+ truly independent tasks that share an interface contract.
Manage long-session context to prevent drift and degradation. Strategies for proactive summarization, branch isolation, and /clear decisions. Invoke when context feels heavy, when accuracy starts slipping, or proactively after a major phase boundary. Addresses the
| name | evanflow-debug |
| description | Root-cause discipline for bugs, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Embedded grill on the hypothesis before writing fix code. Use when encountering any bug, failing test, or behavior that doesn't match expectation. |
See evanflow meta-skill.
SKIP when: the cause is obvious and the fix is one line. Don't ceremonialize trivial bugs.
State the hypothesis explicitly:
"I think the bug is in : because when X happens, Y is supposed to happen but instead Z does."
A vague "probably the validation" is not a hypothesis.
Before writing any fix, ask:
Add an instrument (log, breakpoint, test assertion) that proves the hypothesis right or wrong. Watch the instrument fire. If it doesn't, the hypothesis is wrong — go back to step 2.
The test should fail because the bug exists. This is a vertical-slice TDD application — see evanflow-tdd.
Fix where the root cause originates, not where the symptom appears. If the fix is far from the symptom, leave a comment explaining the WHY (this is one of the few cases where a code comment earns its keep).
Run the test. Run the broader suite. Confirm no regressions.
evanflow-executing-plans. If standalone debug, report what was fixed and STOP. The user decides whether to commit or take further action.evanflow-improve-architectureevanflow-brainstorming to align on intended behavior