Skip to main content

memory-tools

Use EverMe memory proactively when the user refers to previous conversations, earlier decisions, "last time", "remember when", existing project conventions, or previously solved errors, and save durable user preferences, habits, and decisions the moment they are stated. Do not repeat a search when a non-empty <everme_recall> block already exists.

来源信息

仓库
EverMind-AI/EverMe
最近来源活动
2026年8月21日 08:46
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
65
分支
12

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
memory-tools
description
Use EverMe memory proactively when the user refers to previous conversations, earlier decisions, "last time", "remember when", existing project conventions, or previously solved errors, and save durable user preferences, habits, and decisions the moment they are stated. Do not repeat a search when a non-empty <everme_recall> block already exists.
alwaysInclude
true
# EverMe Memory Tools You have four MCP tools (from the `everme-memory` MCP server) for memory EverMe persists across past Kimi Code sessions. Recall: - `mem_search` — semantic + keyword hybrid search over the user's memory store (episodic, profile, agent cases/skills, recent raw transcript). Rows under "Recent unextracted transcript" are provisional, not established facts. - `mem_context` — the user's durable Profile snapshot ONLY. It never searches and never returns episodes; do not use it to recall past decisions or task context. Write: - `mem_save_fact` — save a durable user fact (preference, habit, trait, long-term decision). Call it proactively the moment the user states one — do NOT wait for the user to say "remember this". Only `extracted: true` / `profileUpdated: true` in the result means the profile really updated; on `no_extraction` say so plainly, do not auto-retry, and do not claim success. - `mem_save_turn` — persist a complete task trajectory worth reusing (rarely needed given the automatic SessionEnd write). Chat-dual-write backends may also update the user's Profile; check `profileUpdated`. Use `mem_save_fact` for a deliberate durable fact. The plugin's UserPromptSubmit hook already injects relevant memory automatically before each prompt (wrapped in `<everme_recall>...</everme_recall>`); native hooks also save the session automatically. When native recall exists and is relevant, do not duplicate it; when it is missing and the task depends on history, call the tools proactively. ## When to use these tools **Do call** when: - The `<everme_recall>` block is missing, empty, or clearly unrelated AND the user references something discussed before ("last time", "remember when", "we decided to use X", "continue where we left off") - The user asks about a project pattern, decision, or convention you have no inline context for - You're debugging an error message that may have been seen + resolved before - The user explicitly asks you to "search my memory" / "recall" / "look up" - The user states a durable fact about themselves — call `mem_save_fact` even without being asked **Do NOT call** when: - This turn already carries a non-empty, relevant `<everme_recall>` block covering the topic - You already searched with the same query in the current turn (don't duplicate) - The current message is self-contained and you can answer from inline context - It's a general-knowledge question with no project history component ## Best practices 1. Search with the user's specific terms first; only broaden if zero hits. 2. Cite memories by subject so the user can trace them. 3. Synthesize, don't copy-paste — quote the relevant lines, not whole memory bodies. 4. If recall returns conflicting info ("two prior sessions disagree"), say so and ask the user which is current. 5. The user's emk / evt is a credential — never echo it back, even when EverMe-related errors surface.
在 GitHub 查看