| name | ml-pipeline |
| description | ML pipeline design covering feature engineering, model training workflows, hyperparameter tuning, cross-validation, experiment tracking (MLflow, W&B), model versioning, data versioning (DVC), reproducibility, and pipeline orchestration.
Use when the user asks about ml pipeline, ml pipeline best practices, or needs guidance on ml pipeline implementation.
Do NOT use when the user needs a different specialized skill or is asking about an unrelated technology domain.
|
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"author":"foundry-skills","version":"1.0.0","tags":"ai-ml automation guide","category":"ai-machine-learning","subcategory":"ml-fundamentals","depends":"","disclaimer":"none","difficulty":"intermediate"} |
ML Pipeline
Overview
A production ML pipeline transforms raw data into deployed predictions through a series of reproducible, automated stages. This skill covers end-to-end pipeline design from data ingestion through model training, scoring, versioning, and orchestration, with emphasis on reproducibility and experiment tracking.
Pipeline Architecture
+----------+ +-----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +---------+
| Data | -> | Feature | -> | Model | -> | Model | -> | Model |
| Ingest | | Engineer | | Training | | Scoring | | Registry|
+----------+ +-----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +---------+
| | | | |
v v v v v
[DVC] [Feature [Experiment [Metrics [MLflow
Data Store] Tracker] Store] Registry]
Version
Data Versioning with DVC
Setup
# Initialize DVC in your project
install via pip: dvc dvc-s3 # or dvc-gs, dvc-azure
cd your-ml-project
dvc init
# Configure remote storage
dvc remote add -d myremote s3://my-bucket/dvc-store
dvc remote modify myremote access_key_id $AWS_ACCESS_KEY
dvc remote modify myremote secret_access_key $AWS_SECRET_KEY
# Track a dataset
dvc add data/training_data.csv
git add data/training_data.csv.dvc data/.gitignore
git commit -m "Add training dataset v1"
# Push data to remote
dvc push
Data Pipeline with DVC
stages:
preprocess:
cmd: python src/preprocess.py
deps:
- src/preprocess.py
- data/raw/
params:
- preprocess.min_samples
- preprocess.test_split
outs:
plots:
- metrics/confusion_matrix.csv:
x: predicted
y: actual
preprocess:
min_samples: 100
test_split: 0.2
train:
learning_rate: 0.1
n_estimators: 200
max_depth: 6
# Run the full pipeline
dvc repro
# Compare metrics across experiments
dvc metrics diff
# Switch to a different data version
git checkout v2-data
dvc checkout
Feature Engineering Pipeline
Scikit-learn Pipeline Pattern
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler, OneHotEncoder
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
def build_feature_pipeline(
numeric_features: list[str],
categorical_features: list[str],
text_features: list[str] = None,
) -> ColumnTransformer:
(f"text_{feat}", TfidfVectorizer(max_features=1000), feat)
)
return ColumnTransformer(transformers=transformers)
Full Training Pipeline
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingClassifier
def build_training_pipeline(config: dict) -> Pipeline:
"""Complete pipeline from raw features to predictions."""
feature_pipeline = build_feature_pipeline(
numeric_features=config["numeric_features"],
categorical_features=config["categorical_features"],
)
)),
])
return pipeline
Hyperparameter Tuning
Optuna (Recommended)
import optuna
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
import xgboost as xgb
def objective(trial, X_train, y_train):
"""Optuna objective function for XGBoost tuning."""
params = {
"n_estimators": trial.suggest_int("n_estimators", 100, 1000),
"max_depth": trial.suggest_int("max_depth", 3, 12),
"learning_rate": trial.suggest_float("learning_rate", 0.01, 0.3, log=True),
"min_child_weight": trial.suggest_int("min_child_weight", 1, 10),
)
print(f"Best score: {study.best_value:.4f}")
print(f"Best params: {study.best_params}")
Tuning Strategy Decision Tree
Dataset size < 10K samples?
YES -> Grid search (exhaustive, fast enough)
NO -> Continue
Budget > 100 trials?
YES -> Bayesian optimization (Optuna)
NO -> Continue
Need distributed tuning?
YES -> Ray Tune or Optuna with distributed backend
NO -> Optuna single-node or RandomizedSearchCV
Cross-Validation Strategies
Strategy Selection
| Strategy | When to Use | Pitfall |
|---|
| K-Fold (k=5) | Default choice | Data leakage with time series |
| Stratified K-Fold | Imbalanced classes | Still random splits |
| Time Series Split | Temporal data | Cannot use future data |
| Group K-Fold | Grouped observations | Groups must not leak |
| Leave-One-Out | Very small datasets | Computationally expensive |
| Nested CV | Hyperparameter tuning + scoring | Slow but unbiased |
Nested Cross-Validation
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, StratifiedKFold, RandomizedSearchCV
def nested_cross_validation(X, y, model_fn, param_distributions, n_outer=5, n_inner=3):
"""Unbiased performance estimate with hyperparameter tuning."""
outer_cv = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=n_outer, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
outer_scores = []
for train_idx, test_idx in outer_cv.split(X, y):
X_train, X_test = X.iloc[train_idx], X.iloc[test_idx]
y_train, y_test = y.iloc[train_idx], y.iloc[test_idx]
"mean": np.mean(outer_scores),
"std": np.std(outer_scores),
"scores": outer_scores,
}
Experiment Tracking
MLflow
import mlflow
import mlflow.sklearn
mlflow.set_tracking_uri("[reference URL]")
mlflow.set_experiment("customer-churn-prediction")
def train_with_tracking(config: dict, X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test):
"""Train model with full MLflow tracking."""
with mlflow.start_run(run_name=f"xgb-{config['max_depth']}d"):
"feature_importance.json"
)
return metrics
Weights & Biases
import wandb
def train_with_wandb(config: dict, X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test):
"""Train with W&B tracking and sweeps."""
run = wandb.init(
project="customer-churn",
config=config,
tags=["xgboost", "v2"],
)
"roc_curve": wandb.plot.roc_curve(y_test, model.predict_proba(X_test)),
})
run.finish()
W&B Sweeps for Hyperparameter Tuning
method: bayes
metric:
name: f1
goal: maximize
parameters:
learning_rate:
distribution: log_uniform_values
min: 0.001
max: 0.3
max_depth:
max: 1.0
early_terminate:
type: hyperband
min_iter: 10
sweep_id = wandb.sweep(sweep_config, project="customer-churn")
wandb.agent(sweep_id, function=train_with_wandb, count=50)
Model Versioning and Registry
MLflow Model Registry
from mlflow.tracking import MlflowClient
client = MlflowClient()
model_uri = f"runs:/{run_id}/model"
mv = mlflow.register_model(model_uri, "churn-predictor")
client.transition_model_version_stage(
name="churn-predictor",
name="churn-predictor",
version=mv.version,
stage="Production",
)
Reproducibility
Configuration Management
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
import yaml
@dataclass
class DataConfig:
raw_path: str = "data/raw"
processed_path: str = "data/processed"
test_split: float = 0.2
random_seed: int = 42
min_samples: int = 100
data=DataConfig(**raw.get("data", {})),
model=ModelConfig(**raw.get("model", {})),
experiment_name=raw.get("experiment_name", "default"),
)
Seed Management
import random
import numpy as np
import torch
import os
def set_all_seeds(seed: int = 42):
"""Set all random seeds for reproducibility."""
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
torch.cuda.manual_seed_all(seed)
torch.backends.cudnn.deterministic = True
torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = False
environment-variables["PYTHONHASHSEED"] = str(seed)
Pipeline Orchestration
Prefect Pipeline
from prefect import flow, task
from prefect.artifacts import create_markdown_artifact
@task(retries=2, retry_delay_seconds=60)
def ingest_data(config: DataConfig) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Load and validate raw data."""
df = pd.read_parquet(config.raw_path)
assert len(df) > config.min_samples, f"Too few samples: {len(df)}"
return df
@task
if metrics["f1"] > 0.8:
register_model(model, metrics, config)
return metrics
Airflow DAG
from airflow import DAG
from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
default_args = {
"owner": "ml-team",
"retries": 2,
"retry_delay": timedelta(minutes=5),
"email_on_failure": True,
}
score = PythonOperator(task_id="score_model", python_callable=score_model_fn)
register = PythonOperator(task_id="register_model", python_callable=register_model_fn)
ingest >> feature_eng >> train >> score >> register
Project Structure
ml-project/
+-- config/
| +-- config.yaml
| +-- params.yaml
+-- data/
| +-- raw/
| +-- processed/
| +-- raw.dvc
+-- src/
| +-- data/
| | +-- ingest.py
# ... (condensed) ...
+-- dvc.yaml
+-- dvc.lock
+-- pyproject.toml
+-- Makefile
Checklist
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Designing or implementing ml pipeline solutions
- Reviewing or improving existing ml pipeline approaches
- Making architectural or implementation decisions about ml pipeline
- Learning ml pipeline patterns and best practices
- Troubleshooting ml pipeline-related issues
Do NOT use this skill when:
- The question is about a fundamentally different technology domain
- A more specific sibling skill covers the exact topic needed
- The user needs a complete hands-on tutorial rather than expert guidance
Output Format
# Ml Pipeline Analysis
## Context Assessment
[Situation summary and constraints]
## Recommended Approach
[Primary recommendation with rationale]
## Implementation Steps
1. [Step with specific details]
2. [Step with specific details]
3. [Step with specific details]
## Trade-offs and Considerations
- [Key trade-off 1]
- [Key trade-off 2]
## Next Steps
- [Immediate action item]
- [Follow-up action item]
Example
Input: "Help me implement ml pipeline for a medium-scale production application"
Output: A structured analysis covering current state assessment, recommended ml pipeline approach with specific patterns, implementation roadmap with milestones, and risk mitigation strategies tailored to the application scale and constraints.
Edge Cases
- Legacy system integration: When ml pipeline must coexist with legacy approaches, provide a gradual migration path rather than a complete rewrite
- Scale mismatch: When the solution complexity exceeds the project scale, recommend a simpler approach and note when to revisit
- Team skill gaps: When the team lacks experience with the recommended approach, include learning resources and simpler alternatives
- Conflicting requirements: When constraints conflict (e.g., performance vs. maintainability), explicitly state the trade-off and recommend based on stated priorities