Skip to main content

ad-campaign-analyzer

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
github/awesome-copilot
最近来源活动
2026年7月23日 17:51
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
39,255
分支
4,987

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
ad-campaign-analyzer
description
Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.
license
MIT
compatibility
Cross-platform. Pure reasoning skill over user-provided campaign exports (CSV, paste, or screenshot from Google, Meta, or LinkedIn) — no external tools, network calls, or API keys.
metadata
{"version":"1.0","author":"GooseWorks","source":"https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills"}
# Ad Campaign Analyzer Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan. **Core principle:** Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere). ## When to Use - "Analyze my Google Ads performance" - "Which ads should I kill?" - "Is this campaign working?" - "Where am I wasting ad spend?" - "Optimize my Meta Ads" - "How should I split my ad budget?" - "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?" - "Reallocate my ad spend across channels" - "Where am I getting the best return?" - "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?" ## Phase 0: Intake 1. **Campaign data** — One of: - CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager - Pasted performance table - Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data) 2. **Platform(s)** — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All 3. **Time period** — What date range does this cover? 4. **Monthly budget** — Total ad spend in this period 5. **Primary goal** — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads) 6. **Target metrics** — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark) 7. **Any known changes?** — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period? 8. **Channels currently running** — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other 9. **Funnel data** (if available): - Lead → MQL rate - MQL → SQL rate - SQL → Close rate - Average deal size 10. **Channels you're considering but haven't tried** — Want to test new channels? 11. **Constraints** — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on? ## Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization ### Accepted Data Formats | Source | Key Columns Expected | |--------|---------------------| | **Google Ads** | Campaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value | | **Meta Ads** | Campaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS | | **LinkedIn Ads** | Campaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads | Normalize all data into a standard analysis format: | Dimension | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | Spend | Revenue/Value | |-----------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|-------|--------------| ### Multi-Channel Normalization When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup: | Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* | |---------|-------------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|------|------| | Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] | | Google Display | ... | | | | | | | | | | | Meta (FB/IG) | ... | | | | | | | | | | | LinkedIn | ... | | | | | | | | | | | [Other] | ... | | | | | | | | | | | **Total** | $[X] | | | | | [N] | | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg | *CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment) ### Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available) ``` Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate) ``` This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert. ## Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics ### 2A: Campaign-Level Health Check For each campaign: | Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status | |--------|-------|-----------|--------| | CTR | [X%] | [Industry avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | | CPC | $[X] | [Category avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | | Conv Rate | [X%] | [Benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | | CPA | $[X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | | ROAS | [X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | | Impression Share | [X%] | [>60% ideal] | [Good/Okay/Poor] | ### 2B: Budget Waste Detection Identify spend that produced no or negative return: | Waste Type | Signal | Action | |-----------|--------|--------| | **Zero-conversion keywords/ads** | Spend > $[X] with 0 conversions | Pause or add negatives | | **High CPA outliers** | CPA > 3x target | Pause or restructure | | **Low CTR ads** | CTR < 50% of campaign average | Replace creative | | **Broad match bleed** | Search terms report showing irrelevant clicks | Add negative keywords | | **Audience overlap** | Same users hit by multiple campaigns | Exclude audiences | | **Dayparting waste** | Conversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7 | Set ad schedule | ### 2C: Winner Identification Find what's actually working: | Winner Type | Signal | Action | |------------|--------|--------| | **Top-performing keywords** | Lowest CPA, highest conv rate | Increase bid, add variants | | **Winning ads** | Highest CTR + conv rate combo | Scale spend, clone for other groups | | **Best audiences** | Lowest CPA segment | Increase budget allocation | | **Best times** | Peak conversion hours/days | Concentrate budget | ### 2D: Statistical Significance Check For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages): ``` Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B] Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA] Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size]) Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size]) Confidence level: [X%] Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call] Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance] ``` Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests. ## Phase 3: Funnel Analysis ### Click → Conversion Path ``` Impressions: [N] (100%) ↓ CTR: [X%] Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions) ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%] Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks) ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg Revenue: $[N] ``` ### Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis | Drop-Off Point | Rate | Benchmark | Likely Cause | Fix | |----------------|------|-----------|-------------|-----| | Impression → Click | [CTR%] | [Benchmark] | [Ad relevance / targeting] | [Copy/targeting change] | | Click → Conversion | [Conv%] | [Benchmark] | [Landing page / offer / audience mismatch] | [LP optimization] | | Conversion → Revenue | [Close%] | [Benchmark] | [Lead quality / sales process] | [Qualification criteria] | ## Phase 4: Budget Reallocation When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization. ### 4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking | Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index | |------|---------|-----|---------------|----------------|---------------------|-----------------| | 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] | **Efficiency Index:** - **> 1.0** = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions) - **= 1.0** = Proportional (fair share) - **< 1.0** = Over-invested (getting less than its share) ### 4B: Marginal Return Analysis For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns: | Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate | |---------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------| | Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive | | Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing | | LinkedIn | $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon | ### 4C: Funnel Stage Coverage | Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? | |-------------|---------------------|--------------|------| | **Awareness** (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] | | **Consideration** (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] | | **Decision** (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] | | **Retargeting** | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] | ### 4D: Budget Shift Recommendations | Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning | |---------|-------------|------------------|--------|-----------| | Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] | | Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] | | LinkedIn | $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] |
在 GitHub 查看
这个 SKILL.md 很大,SkillsMP 这里只预览前一段内容。 在 GitHub 查看