Skip to main content

sandbox-filesystem-access

Configure or diagnose file and directory access, mounts, and host ACLs for AWF sandboxes.

来源信息

仓库
github/gh-aw-firewall
最近来源活动
2026年10月16日 16:35
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
157
Forks
80

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
sandbox-filesystem-access
description
Configure or diagnose file and directory access, mounts, and host ACLs for AWF sandboxes.
# Sandbox Filesystem Access Use this skill when changing or troubleshooting which host files and directories an agent can read, write, or traverse inside an AWF sandbox. Treat host permissions, sandbox mount policy, and the sandbox's effective view as separate checks: a writable mount does not override host ownership or ACLs, and host permissions do not make an unmounted path visible. ## Find the runtime-specific source of truth First identify the selected runtime and the access path being changed. Do not assume all runtimes implement mounts the same way. - **Docker / gVisor compose:** Review [`docs/mount-policy.md`](../../../docs/mount-policy.md), [`docs/environment.md`](../../../docs/environment.md), and `src/services/agent-volumes/`. The agent runs chrooted under `/host`; account for that path mapping when comparing host paths with paths used by the agent. - **Docker Sandboxes (`sbx`):** Review the volume-mount section of [`docs/sbx-integration.md`](../../../docs/sbx-integration.md) and `src/sbx-manager.ts`. Workspace and positional mounts appear at the same absolute path in the guest; additional mounts do not support an independent guest destination. - **Cloud Hypervisor:** Review the export and write-policy sections of [`docs/cloud-hypervisor-foundation.md`](../../../docs/cloud-hypervisor-foundation.md) and `src/cloud-hypervisor/exports.ts`. Do not infer its exports or write permissions from the compose mount list. For compose and sbx home-directory policy changes, use [`src/config/sandbox-mount-policy.json`](../../../src/config/sandbox-mount-policy.json) as the shared policy and follow [`docs/mount-policy.md`](../../../docs/mount-policy.md) for its runtime scope and tests. Cloud Hypervisor does not currently consume that home policy. ## Configure access narrowly 1. Name the exact host source, guest-visible path, required operations (read/write/execute/traverse), and runtime. Confirm the source exists and determine whether the configuration accepts a file, directory, or only a directory mount. 2. Grant only the required access. Prefer a specific read-only mount; if output is needed, make only the necessary output path writable. Avoid mounting `/`, the full host home, or broad credential-bearing directories. 3. Check existing parent and nested mounts before adding one. Mount ordering or a narrower child mount can change the effective access of a path. On ARC/DinD, verify the Docker daemon can see the source and account for `--docker-host-path-prefix`. 4. Preserve credential exclusions and the backend's isolation guarantees. A host ACL or mode change is not a substitute for a narrowly scoped sandbox mount. 5. Add or update a focused test for the policy or mount-generation behavior in the module being changed. Cover both the requested access and a nearby denied or read-only case. ## Verify effective access Check each layer independently, using the actual host source and guest path: 1. **Host DAC/ACL:** Inspect owner, group, mode, and ACL entries. For example: `stat -c '%A %a %u:%g %n' <path>` and, when available, `getfacl -p <path>`. Check execute/traverse permission on every parent directory as well as the file or directory itself. Do not change host permissions merely to make a sandbox test pass. 2. **Generated mount/export:** For compose, inspect the generated volume and the running container's actual mounts (for example, `docker inspect <container> --format '{{json .Mounts}}' | jq`). For sbx or Cloud Hypervisor, inspect the corresponding generated command/export plan and runtime-specific diagnostics. Confirm the source, destination, and read-only/read-write mode. 3. **Guest identity and effective access:** Run checks inside the command AWF wraps, with the agent's actual user, groups, privileges, and guest path. In compose, a plain `docker exec awf-agent ...` runs as container root outside the `/host` chroot and can bypass mode/ACL restrictions; it is not equivalent to the agent command. Check `id`, inspect the target with `stat`, and use `test -r`, `test -w`, or `test -x` as preliminary permission probes. When write access is expected, confirm it by creating and removing a disposable file in the intended output directory. Use `findmnt -T <path>` when available to identify the supplying mount, not to prove write access: Cloud Hypervisor exports narrowed by `filesystem.allowWrite` can remain `rw` in the guest while the host mount tree denies writes outside allowed paths. A mount declaration or permission probe alone does not prove the intended operation works. Keep verification non-destructive. Never read, print, or copy credential contents while checking access; verify sensitive paths by checking existence, metadata, or expected denial only. ## Report the result State the runtime, host source, guest path, expected access, and observed effective access. Distinguish a missing mount from a host permission/ACL denial and from a read-only mount. Include the focused test or runtime check used, and call out any backend that was not verified.
在 GitHub 查看