菜单
Patterns for synthesizing findings across multiple frameworks into one readable portfolio view. Use when a /report:* command is pulling from more than one framework plugin and needs to avoid drowning the reader in control IDs.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill program-portfolio-composition命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Verbatim reference for all 320 NIST 800-171A Rev 2 assessment objectives, plus the Rev 2 → Rev 3 control crosswalk. Use for AO-level lookups (e.g., 3.1.1[c]), evidence planning, and forward-mapping to Rev 3. Pairs with cmmc-expert.
Scaffolds a complete React/Vite website project from site-config.json. Generates components, styles, and configuration based on the site type and plan data.
Validates AWS readiness for website deployment. Checks CLI tools, credentials, SES, Route 53, and ACM. Produces a report with pass/fail and action items.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | program-portfolio-composition |
| description | Patterns for synthesizing findings across multiple frameworks into one readable portfolio view. Use when a /report:* command is pulling from more than one framework plugin and needs to avoid drowning the reader in control IDs. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep |
Most GRC programs run 3 to 8 frameworks. Presenting each one in full is how leadership reports get ignored. The job is to show the portfolio, not every control.
Most "different" controls across frameworks map back to the same SCF control. SCF IAC-01 shows up as SOC 2 CC6.1, NIST AC-2, ISO A.9.2, CMMC AC.L2-3.1.1, and more. When you report the portfolio, collapse down to SCF first, then expand back to frameworks for the appendix.
A 15-framework program is usually a 400 SCF control program. That's the denominator that matters.
1. Coverage table (one row per framework)
| Framework | Coverage | 30-day delta | Top gap | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | 82% | +3 pp | Access reviews | IAM |
Five columns. Never more. If you need more, split into a second table with a clear break (e.g., "priority frameworks" vs "monitored frameworks").
2. Leverage list (cross-framework patterns)
Controls that fail in 3+ frameworks. Fix one, close many. This is the board-friendly version of "we are investing in the right things."
Example: "SCF IAC-15 (account-recertification) fails in SOC 2, FedRAMP, and ISO 27001. One automation project closes all three. Scoped for Q2."
3. Watch list (at-risk items)
Controls or frameworks trending down. Specifically name what could slip, why, and what prevents it.
If the portfolio view is more than 2 pages, it has become the detailed report.
If the leverage list is empty, either you haven't mapped through SCF yet, or the program has no compounding work in flight. The first is a tooling fix. The second is a program problem worth naming.
If every framework shows identical coverage week over week, the pipeline isn't producing fresh findings. Flag this in the report rather than reporting stale numbers as if they were current.
