persona-generator

name	persona-generator
description	Create research-backed buyer personas that drive real marketing and product decisions. Combine Buyer Personas methodology with Jobs-to-be-Done to build profiles based on actual behavior, not demographics fiction. Use when: **Starting customer discovery** to define who you're validating with; **Marketing campaign planning** to target the right messages to right people; **Content strategy** to create content that resonates with specific audiences; **Product roadmap prioritization** to build fea...
license	MIT
metadata	{"author":"ClawFu","version":"1.0.0","mcp-server":"@clawfu/mcp-skills"}

Persona Generator

Create research-backed buyer personas that drive real marketing and product decisions. Combine Buyer Personas methodology with Jobs-to-be-Done to build profiles based on actual behavior, not demographics fiction.

When to Use This Skill

• Starting customer discovery to define who you're validating with
• Marketing campaign planning to target the right messages to right people
• Content strategy to create content that resonates with specific audiences
• Product roadmap prioritization to build features for real users
• Sales enablement to help sales understand who they're talking to
• Team alignment to get everyone speaking the same customer language

Methodology Foundation

Aspect	Details
Source	Adele Revella - "Buyer Personas" (2015) + Clayton Christensen - Jobs-to-be-Done
Core Principle	"Buyer personas built on real research reveal the thinking behind buying decisions—not just demographics, but motivations, anxieties, and decision criteria."
Why This Matters	Most personas are demographic fiction ("Marketing Mary, 35, likes yoga"). Useful personas explain WHY someone buys—their anxieties, trigger events, and decision process.

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude Does	You Decide
Structures production workflow	Final creative direction
Suggests technical approaches	Equipment and tool choices
Creates templates and checklists	Quality standards
Identifies best practices	Brand/voice decisions
Generates script outlines	Final script approval

What This Skill Does

1. Generates research-based personas - Built on behavior, not demographics
2. Identifies buying triggers - What events cause someone to seek a solution
3. Maps decision criteria - What factors drive the purchase decision
4. Surfaces anxieties and barriers - What stops them from buying
5. Documents the buyer's journey - How they research and decide
6. Creates actionable segments - Personas that drive real decisions

How to Use

Generate Personas from Customer Interviews

I've completed [X] customer interviews. Here are my notes: [summary]
Generate buyer personas using the Buyer Personas + JTBD methodology.
Focus on buying triggers, decision criteria, and anxieties.

Create Hypothesis Personas (Pre-Research)

I'm building [product] for [market].
Generate hypothesis personas I should validate through customer discovery.
Include questions to ask to validate each persona.

Analyze and Improve Existing Personas

Here are our current personas: [paste personas]
Analyze them against best practices.
What's missing? What questions should we research to make them useful?

Instructions

When generating personas, follow this evidence-based methodology:

Step 1: Understand What Makes Personas Useful

## The Persona Problem

### BAD Personas (Demographic Fiction)
"Marketing Mary"
- Age: 35
- Income: $80K
- Lives in suburbs
- Likes yoga and organic food
- Uses Instagram

**Why this fails:**
- Describes demographics, not motivations
- Doesn't explain why she would buy
- Can't drive marketing/product decisions
- Could describe millions of people

### GOOD Personas (Behavioral/JTBD-Based)
"The Overwhelmed First-Timer"
- **Trigger:** Just got promoted to manager, now responsible for [task]
- **Job-to-be-Done:** Make me look competent to my boss
- **Current Behavior:** Using spreadsheets, asking colleagues, stressed
- **Decision Criteria:** Easy to learn, makes me look good, won't fail publicly
- **Anxiety:** "What if I choose wrong and look incompetent?"

**Why this works:**
- Explains what triggered the search
- Reveals what they're really hiring the product to do
- Shows how they decide
- Surfaces what might stop them
- Drives specific marketing and product decisions

---

Step 2: The Five Rings of Buying Insight

## Adele Revella's Five Rings

### Ring 1: PRIORITY INITIATIVE
**What event triggered their search?**

Questions to research:
- What was the trigger event?
- Why now vs. 6 months ago?
- What finally made this urgent?
- What was the breaking point?

Example insight:
"They start looking when they get a new boss who asks 'why don't we have...' or when a competitor does something that makes them look behind."

---

### Ring 2: SUCCESS FACTORS
**What outcome are they trying to achieve?**

Questions to research:
- What does success look like?
- How will they measure results?
- What would make them a hero internally?
- What would make them regret the decision?

Example insight:
"They don't actually want [product feature]. They want to be seen as innovative by their CEO while not risking a high-profile failure."

---

### Ring 3: PERCEIVED BARRIERS
**What could stop them from buying?**

Questions to research:
- What concerns came up during evaluation?
- What almost made them walk away?
- What would cause them to delay?
- What do they fear will go wrong?

Example insight:
"Their biggest fear isn't that it won't work—it's that their team won't use it and they'll have wasted budget on something that sits unused."

---

### Ring 4: DECISION CRITERIA
**How do they evaluate options?**

Questions to research:
- What features/capabilities are must-haves?
- How do they compare options?
- Who else influences the decision?
- What trade-offs are they willing to make?

Example insight:
"They create a spreadsheet comparing 3-5 options. Integration with existing stack is #1. If it doesn't connect to Salesforce, they won't consider it."

---

### Ring 5: BUYER'S JOURNEY
**How do they research and decide?**

Questions to research:
- How did they first learn about the category?
- What resources did they use to research?
- Who did they talk to?
- What was the decision timeline?

Example insight:
"They google '[category] vs [category]' then ask for recommendations in a Slack community. Reviews on G2 are the final checkpoint before talking to sales."

---

Step 3: Add Jobs-to-be-Done Layer

## JTBD Analysis Per Persona

### The Job Statement
"When I [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome]."

### Three Types of Jobs

**Functional Job:** What they need to accomplish
- "I need to get this report done faster"
- "I need to track our campaigns across channels"

**Emotional Job:** How they want to feel
- "I want to feel confident presenting to the board"
- "I don't want to worry about this anymore"

**Social Job:** How they want to be perceived
- "I want my team to see me as innovative"
- "I don't want to look like I made a bad decision"

### Forces That Drive Switching

**Push (away from current):**
- Pain points with current solution
- Frustrations with status quo
- External pressures (boss, market, competition)

**Pull (toward new):**
- Desired outcomes
- Attractive features
- Vision of better future

**Anxiety (about switching):**
- Fear of failure
- Implementation concerns
- Uncertainty about claims

**Habit (keeping current):**
- Familiarity with status quo
- Sunk costs
- "Good enough" mentality

For a persona to buy: Push + Pull > Anxiety + Habit

---

Step 4: Persona Template

## PERSONA: [Name Based on Behavior, Not Demographics]

### Snapshot
| Aspect | Detail |
|--------|--------|
| **Role** | [Job title / responsibility] |
| **Environment** | [Company size, industry, team structure] |
| **Primary JTBD** | [Job statement] |
| **Current Solution** | [What they use today] |

---

### Ring 1: Priority Initiative (Trigger)

**What triggers the search:**
- [Specific event 1]
- [Specific event 2]
- [Specific event 3]

**Why now (urgency drivers):**
- [What makes them act now vs. later]

**Quotes:**
> "[Verbatim from research]"

---

### Ring 2: Success Factors

**Desired outcomes:**
1. [Functional outcome]
2. [Emotional outcome]
3. [Social outcome]

**How they'll measure success:**
- [Metric or indicator]

**What makes them a hero:**
- [Internal win they're seeking]

**Quotes:**
> "[Verbatim from research]"

---

### Ring 3: Perceived Barriers

**Concerns/anxieties:**
1. [Concern about product/vendor]
2. [Concern about implementation]
3. [Concern about results]

**What almost stops them:**
- [Top barrier]

**Risk they fear most:**
- [What failure looks like]

**Quotes:**
> "[Verbatim from research]"

---

### Ring 4: Decision Criteria

**Must-haves (non-negotiable):**
1. [Feature/capability]
2. [Feature/capability]
3. [Feature/capability]

**Nice-to-haves:**
- [Feature/capability]

**Deal-breakers:**
- [What would eliminate you]

**How they compare:**
- [Their evaluation process]

**Quotes:**
> "[Verbatim from research]"

---

### Ring 5: Buyer's Journey

**Stage 1 - Trigger:** [What happens]
**Stage 2 - Research:** [Where they look]
**Stage 3 - Evaluate:** [How they compare]
**Stage 4 - Decide:** [Who's involved]
**Stage 5 - Buy:** [Process/procurement]

**Information sources:**
- [Channel 1]
- [Channel 2]
- [Influencers]

**Timeline:** [Typical decision timeframe]

---

### Jobs-to-be-Done

**Primary Job:**
"When I [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]."

**Functional Job:** [What to accomplish]
**Emotional Job:** [How to feel]
**Social Job:** [How to be seen]

**Forces Analysis:**
| Force | Strength | Specifics |
|-------|----------|-----------|
| Push | High/Med/Low | [Details] |
| Pull | High/Med/Low | [Details] |
| Anxiety | High/Med/Low | [Details] |
| Habit | High/Med/Low | [Details] |

---

### Marketing Implications

**Messaging that resonates:**
- [Message/hook]
- [Message/hook]

**Content they'd engage with:**
- [Content type]
- [Content type]

**Where to reach them:**
- [Channel]
- [Channel]

**What NOT to say:**
- [Anti-message]

---

### Sales Implications

**Objections to expect:**
- [Objection]
- [Objection]

**Questions they'll ask:**
- [Question]
- [Question]

**Proof points they need:**
- [Case study/demo]

**Decision process:**
- [How deals close with this persona]

---

Step 5: Validate and Update

## Persona Validation Checklist

### Is this persona based on evidence?
- [ ] Minimum 5 interviews with this type
- [ ] Includes verbatim quotes
- [ ] Describes behavior, not just demographics
- [ ] Explains WHY they buy

### Does this persona enable decisions?
- [ ] Marketing team can use it to target campaigns
- [ ] Product team can use it to prioritize features
- [ ] Sales team can use it to tailor conversations
- [ ] Content team can use it to create relevant assets

### Is this persona distinct?
- [ ] Clearly different from other personas
- [ ] Different triggers
- [ ] Different decision criteria
- [ ] Different objections/anxieties

### Red Flags (Persona Needs Work)
- [ ] Based on assumptions, not research
- [ ] All demographics, no behaviors
- [ ] No quotes from real customers
- [ ] Too vague to drive decisions
- [ ] Overlaps significantly with another persona

---

Examples

Example 1: B2B SaaS Personas

Input:

"Generate personas for our marketing analytics dashboard. Target: marketing managers at 100-500 employee B2B companies. Price: $500/month."

Output:

PERSONA 1: The Proving-ROI Manager

Snapshot

Aspect	Detail
Role	Marketing Manager, reports to VP/CMO
Environment	B2B SaaS, 100-300 employees, small marketing team (3-5)
Primary JTBD	Prove marketing's ROI to justify budget and headcount
Current Solution	Spreadsheets + GA + Hubspot reports (manual)

---

Ring 1: Priority Initiative (Trigger)

What triggers the search:

• CFO/CEO asks "what's the ROI on marketing spend?"
• Budget review coming up, needs to defend numbers
• New CMO joins and wants visibility into performance
• Competitor's marketing seems more effective, board asking questions

Why now:

• Annual planning cycle approaching
• Just missed a target and needs to explain why
• Growing pressure to be "data-driven"

Quotes:

"My CFO asked me last week what our CAC is by channel. I had to spend a full day in spreadsheets to give him a rough estimate."

---

Ring 2: Success Factors

Desired outcomes:

1. One dashboard that shows marketing ROI (functional)
2. Confidence presenting to leadership (emotional)
3. Seen as data-driven and strategic (social)

How they'll measure success:

• Time saved on reporting
• Ability to answer CFO questions immediately
• Cleaner attribution to defend spend

What makes them a hero:

• "This dashboard proved we should 2x our Google Ads budget"

---

Ring 3: Perceived Barriers

Concerns:

1. Will my team actually use this? (adoption)
2. Is the data accurate? (trust)
3. How long to implement? (time)

What almost stops them:

• Integration complexity with existing stack
• Fear of seeing data they don't want to see

Risk they fear:

• "I buy this, it's wrong, and now I've given the CFO bad data"

Quotes:

"We tried a dashboard before and the numbers never matched Hubspot. That was a disaster."

---

Ring 4: Decision Criteria

Must-haves:

1. Integrates with Hubspot (or their CRM)
2. Connects to Google Ads + LinkedIn
3. Attribution modeling (not just last-click)

Nice-to-haves:

• Automated reports
• Benchmarks vs. industry

Deal-breakers:

• Manual data entry required
• No Hubspot integration
• Takes >2 weeks to implement

How they compare:

• Create comparison spreadsheet
• Check G2 reviews
• Need social proof from similar companies

---

Ring 5: Buyer's Journey

1. Trigger: CFO asks hard question → realizes need
2. Research: Google "marketing attribution software", asks peers in Slack
3. Evaluate: Shortlists 3 options, demos each, checks integrations
4. Decide: Brings to boss, creates business case, budget approval
5. Buy: IT security review, procurement, signed

Timeline: 4-8 weeks from trigger to purchase

---

Marketing Implications

Messaging that resonates:

• "Answer CFO questions in real-time"
• "Prove marketing ROI without spreadsheets"
• "Attribution you can trust"

Where to reach them:

• LinkedIn (Marketing Manager targeting)
• RevOps/Marketing Slack communities
• G2/Capterra (bottom of funnel)

What NOT to say:

• "Vanity metrics" (they want revenue, not impressions)
• "AI-powered" (skeptical of hype)

---

PERSONA 2: The Accidental Analyst

Snapshot

Aspect	Detail
Role	Marketing Coordinator or Specialist, early career
Environment	B2B, 150-400 employees, reports to Marketing Manager
Primary JTBD	Get data to my boss without spending all week in spreadsheets
Current Solution	Export from 5 tools, combine in Excel, format in Slides

---

Ring 1: Priority Initiative

What triggers the search:

• Weekly report takes 4+ hours to create
• Boss asks for new data cut they can't easily produce
• Made an error in last report, got called out

Quotes:

"Every Monday I dread the reporting. I spend half my day in Excel just pulling numbers together."

---

Ring 2: Success Factors

Desired outcomes:

1. Reporting takes 30 minutes not 4 hours (functional)
2. Stop dreading Mondays (emotional)
3. Look efficient and capable to manager (social)

---

Ring 3: Perceived Barriers

Concerns:

• "I'm not technical—will I be able to set this up?"
• "Is this within my budget authority?" (need to get approval)
• "What if the numbers don't match what I've been reporting?"

---

Ring 4: Decision Criteria

Must-haves:

1. No-code setup
2. Pre-built report templates
3. Easy to learn (not complex)

How they compare:

• Search YouTube for tutorials
• Look for "easy to use" in reviews
• Free trial required

---

Marketing Implications

Messaging:

• "Your weekly report in 5 minutes"
• "No Excel required"
• "So easy, you'll set it up in an afternoon"

Where to reach:

• YouTube tutorials
• "Best [category] for beginners" content
• Marketing career newsletters

Who they influence:

• They don't buy, but they recommend to their manager (Persona 1)

---

Example 2: Consumer Product Personas

Input:

"We're launching a premium meal prep service ($150/week). Create personas based on these 8 customer interviews."

Interview Summary:

• 4 were working professionals who said "no time to cook"
• 2 were new parents who said "eating garbage since baby came"
• 2 were fitness-focused who said "need macro-specific meals"

Output:

PERSONA 1: The Burned-Out Professional

Snapshot

Aspect	Detail
Role	Professional, 28-40, demanding job (consulting, finance, tech)
Environment	Urban, long hours, high income, limited personal time
Primary JTBD	Eat healthy without sacrificing career performance
Current Solution	Takeout, occasional HelloFresh (but doesn't cook it)

---

Ring 1: Priority Initiative

Triggers:

• Doctor says cholesterol is high
• Gained 10 lbs since starting new job
• Realized they've eaten takeout 5 days straight
• Friend looks great and asks what they're doing

Why now:

• Health scare or milestone birthday
• New Year's resolution
• Partner commented on their diet

Quotes:

"I know I should eat better. I've tried cooking on Sunday but I'm so tired by the weekend I just don't."

---

Ring 2: Success Factors

Desired outcomes:

1. Eat healthy meals without effort (functional)
2. Stop feeling guilty about my diet (emotional)
3. Look like I have my life together (social)

What success looks like:

• "I eat real food without thinking about it"
• "I have energy in the afternoon"

---

Ring 3: Perceived Barriers

Concerns:

1. "$150/week feels expensive" (but they spend that on takeout)
2. "What if I don't like the food?"
3. "Will it actually fit my schedule?"

Anxiety:

• "Another subscription I'll cancel in a month"
• "Food delivery quality—will it be fresh?"

Quotes:

"I've tried Blue Apron twice. Both times I ended up with a fridge full of rotting ingredients."

---

Ring 4: Decision Criteria

Must-haves:

1. Zero cooking required (key!)
2. Healthy (real ingredients, balanced macros)
3. Variety (won't get bored)

Nice-to-haves:

• Customization for preferences
• Delivery flexibility

Deal-breakers:

• Any cooking/prep required
• Only healthy "rabbit food"
• Long subscription commitment

---

Ring 5: Buyer's Journey

1. See friend on Instagram eating nice meal
2. Ask them about it or Google "meal delivery no cooking"
3. Compare 2-3 options on website, check reviews
4. Trial week to test
5. Subscribe if trial worked

Timeline: Same-week decision for trial

---

Marketing Implications

Messaging:

• "Eat like you have a personal chef"
• "Zero prep. Zero cleanup. Real food."
• "For people too busy to cook but too smart to eat garbage"

Where to reach:

• Instagram (lifestyle/food content)
• Podcasts (business, productivity)
• LinkedIn (target by industry)

What NOT to say:

• "Meal kits" (sounds like cooking)
• "Diet food" (sounds restrictive)

---

PERSONA 2: The Optimized Athlete

(Abbreviated for space)

Key Differences from Persona 1

Aspect	Burned-Out Professional	Optimized Athlete
Primary JTBD	Eat healthy without effort	Hit my macros precisely
Trigger	Health concern, guilt	Competition coming, plateau
Success Factor	Convenience	Performance/results
Decision Criteria	No cooking	Macro transparency
Barrier	"Another subscription"	"Will macros be accurate?"
Messaging	"Zero effort"	"Fuel your performance"

---

Checklists & Templates

Persona Interview Questions

## Customer Interview Guide for Persona Development

### Trigger (Priority Initiative)
- "What was happening when you first started looking for [solution]?"
- "Why now? Why not 6 months ago?"
- "What was the trigger event?"
- "What finally pushed you to do something?"

### Success Factors
- "What did you hope would change after buying?"
- "How would you know if this worked?"
- "If this was perfect, what would that look like?"
- "What would success mean for you personally?"

### Barriers (Perceived Risks)
- "What concerns did you have before buying?"
- "What almost made you NOT buy?"
- "What worries did you have about making a change?"
- "What would failure look like?"

### Decision Criteria
- "What was most important to you in evaluating options?"
- "What features were must-haves?"
- "What made you choose us over alternatives?"
- "What would have been a deal-breaker?"

### Buyer's Journey
- "How did you first hear about this category?"
- "What did you research? Where?"
- "Who else was involved in the decision?"
- "How long from first search to purchase?"

---

Persona Validation Score

## Persona Quality Score

**Persona:** _______________

| Criteria | Score (1-5) | Notes |
|----------|-------------|-------|
| Based on real interviews (not assumptions) | | |
| Includes verbatim quotes | | |
| Explains triggers (why now) | | |
| Explains decision criteria | | |
| Surfaces real anxieties | | |
| Maps buyer's journey | | |
| Includes JTBD statement | | |
| Distinct from other personas | | |
| Marketing team can use it | | |
| Sales team can use it | | |

**Total:** __/50

- 40+: Ready to use
- 30-39: Needs more research
- <30: Start over with customer interviews

---

Quick Persona Card

## [Persona Name]

**One-liner:** [Job title] who [key behavior] because [primary motivation].

**Trigger:** They start looking when ________________________________

**Job-to-be-Done:** "When I [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]."

**Top 3 Decision Criteria:**
1.
2.
3.

**Biggest Anxiety:** ________________________________

**We win by:** ________________________________

---

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

• Structuring audio production workflows
• Providing technical guidance
• Creating quality checklists
• Suggesting creative approaches

What This Skill Cannot Do

• Replace audio engineering expertise
• Make subjective creative decisions
• Access or edit audio files directly
• Guarantee commercial success

References

• Revella, Adele. "Buyer Personas" (2015) - Five Rings methodology
• Christensen, Clayton. "Competing Against Luck" (2016) - Jobs-to-be-Done
• Ulwick, Tony. "What Customers Want" (2005) - Outcome-Driven Innovation
• Blank, Steve. "The Four Steps to the Epiphany" (2005) - Customer archetypes
• Klement, Alan. "When Coffee and Kale Compete" (2016) - JTBD for product

Related Skills

• jobs-to-be-done - Deep dive on JTBD theory
• buyer-personas - Original Adele Revella framework
• mom-test - How to interview customers for persona research
• customer-discovery - Systematic validation methodology
• audience-research - Broader audience understanding

---

Skill Metadata (Internal Use)

name: persona-generator
category: validation
subcategory: customer-research
version: 1.0
author: MKTG Skills
source_expert: Adele Revella, Clayton Christensen
source_work: Buyer Personas, Competing Against Luck
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_value: $3,000 persona research project
tags: [personas, customer-research, JTBD, buyer-personas, segmentation, YC]
created: 2026-01-25
updated: 2026-01-25