菜单
In-depth reporting, source verification, document analysis, FOI requests, investigative techniques for political accountability
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Master GitHub Agentic Workflows authoring - markdown syntax, natural language instructions, YAML frontmatter, compilation, and workflow patterns
Comprehensive expertise in GitHub Agentic Workflows (v0.68.1) — AI-powered repository automation with five-layer security, safe outputs, MCP tools, and Continuous AI patterns
Comprehensive guide for MCP (Model Context Protocol) server setup, transport protocols, configuration validation, lifecycle management, tool discovery, and error handling patterns
Comprehensive Hack23 threat modeling process using STRIDE, MITRE ATT&CK, attack trees, and quantitative risk assessment per ISMS Threat_Modeling.md policy
Fiscal policy, budget analysis, economic forecasting, monetary policy, trade policy for political journalists
Comprehensive guide to integrating agentic automation with GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines, including workflow triggers, environment configuration, secrets management, matrix strategies, and deployment patterns for production-ready autonomous systems.
| name | investigative-journalism |
| description | In-depth reporting, source verification, document analysis, FOI requests, investigative techniques for political accountability |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
Apply the AI FIRST principle: never accept first-pass quality. Minimum 2 iterations. Read all output, improve every section. No shortcuts.
Provides expertise in investigative journalism techniques for deep political accountability reporting. Covers source verification, document analysis, freedom of information (FOI) requests, data journalism, and ethical investigative practices for systematic transparency in Swedish governance.
Offentlighetsprincipen (Constitutional right to access public documents):
Protected Categories:
**Investigation: Ministry of Finance Real Estate Contracts**
**FOI Request Strategy**:
1. Initial request: "All contracts over 1 million SEK with real
estate companies, 2024-2025"
2. Response: 47 contracts totaling 890 million SEK
3. Follow-up: "All email correspondence regarding contracts
[specific IDs] with [specific companies]"
4. Response: Partial denial citing "ongoing negotiations"
5. Appeal: To Ombudsman, citing public interest override
**Document Analysis**:
- Contract [X]: No competitive bidding, sole-source award
- Company [Y]: Owned by former Ministry official (3 years ago)
- Contract value: 40% above market rates (per audit office data)
- Timeline: Award 2 weeks after official left government
**Verification**:
- Land registry: Confirmed company ownership
- Audit Office: Provided comparative pricing data
- Former Ministry colleagues: Confirmed relationship (anonymous)
- Company representative: No comment
- Ministry spokesperson: "All contracts followed proper procedures"
**Publication Decision**:
- Public interest: Clear (taxpayer money, potential conflict)
- Evidence: Strong (documents, comparative data, timeline)
- Right to reply: Exercised (Ministry, company, individual)
- Legal risk: Low (factual reporting, documented)
- Privacy: Former official is public figure, minimal privacy expectation
*Result: Published investigation with full document citations*
**Investigation: Voting Discipline Breach Pattern**
**Data Analysis**:
- Analyzed 2,487 Riksdag votes (2023-2025)
- Identified 12 MPs with >15% deviation from party line
- Focused on 3 MPs with systematic pattern in specific policy area
**Interview Process**:
- Background research on MPs' constituencies and donor relationships
- Initial contact: Open-ended questions about voting rationale
- Follow-up: Specific questions about industry connections
- Confidential sources: Two party insiders confirmed pressure
**Document Trail**:
- Committee minutes: Revealed close relationships with industry reps
- Meeting schedules: Frequent meetings with affected companies
- Campaign finance: Donations from industry PACs (legal but relevant)
**Analysis**:
- Pattern: All 3 MPs voted against party on regulations affecting donors
- Timeline: Votes correlated with campaign donation dates (+/- 30 days)
- Context: No principled explanation given, pattern suspicious
**Publication Considerations**:
- Public interest: High (accountability, potential undue influence)
- Evidence: Circumstantial but strong pattern
- Alternative explanations: MPs claim "constituency concerns"
- Balance: Present evidence, note alternative explanations
- Conclusion: Let readers judge, provide context
*Result: Published analysis with call for stronger disclosure rules*
Use this skill when: Conducting in-depth accountability investigations, filing FOI requests, analyzing documents and data for corruption patterns, verifying sources for major revelations, or navigating ethical boundaries in investigative reporting.
This skill is consumed by the 11 agentic news workflows in .github/workflows/news-*.md. The authoritative contract lives in .github/prompts/README.md; this skill supplies domain expertise on top of that contract.
ai-driven-analysis-guide.md + every template in analysis/templates/.analysis/daily/$ARTICLE_DATE/$SUBFOLDER/; 05-analysis-gate.md is the single blocking gate.