菜单
Review an ExStruct ADR draft for required sections, status values, evidence quality, supersede links, and balanced consequences. Use when an ADR already exists in draft form and you need findings before review or merge.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/harumiWeb/exstruct --skill adr-linter命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Review an ExStruct ADR draft for decision quality, overlap with existing ADRs and specs, evidence strength, rollout risk, and human-ownership escalations. Use only after adr-linter reports no unresolved high/medium findings on the current draft, and when you need design-review findings before merge or handoff.
Use ExStruct CLI to validate, inspect, create, and edit Excel workbooks safely. Trigger when an agent needs `exstruct patch`, `exstruct make`, `exstruct validate`, `exstruct ops list`, or `exstruct ops describe`, especially for create-vs-edit decisions, dry-run workflows, backend constraints, or safe workbook-edit guidance.
Maintain ExStruct ADR index artifacts by scanning ADR files and synchronizing README, index.yaml, and decision-map.md metadata. Use when ADRs are added, updated, superseded, or reclassified and the repository needs a refreshed ADR map for humans and AI agents.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | adr-linter |
| description | Review an ExStruct ADR draft for required sections, status values, evidence quality, supersede links, and balanced consequences. Use when an ADR already exists in draft form and you need findings before review or merge. |
Review the ADR as a decision record, not as prose polish.
dev-docs/agents/adr-governance.mddev-docs/agents/adr-workflow.mddev-docs/adr/template.md状態, 背景, 決定, 影響, 根拠, Supersedes, and Superseded by.根拠 contains concrete Tests, Code, or Related specs.Return findings first, ordered by severity.
high: contract hole, missing decision, invalid status, missing supersede linkagemedium: weak context, weak evidence, one-sided consequenceslow: clarity or consistency issuesIf no findings exist, say that explicitly and mention any residual review risk.