Skip to main content

memory

Find or curate supported lessons and agent rules. Use when: asked to remember, trace a corrected claim, audit instructions or write an agent rule.

来源信息

仓库
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
最近来源活动
2026年10月22日 16:36
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
1,401
Forks
399

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
9 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
memory
description
Find or curate supported lessons and agent rules. Use when: asked to remember, trace a corrected claim, audit instructions or write an agent rule.
practices
["evidence-based-engineering","continuous-learning"]
hexagonal_role
supporting
consumes
[]
produces
["applicable-context","reviewed-topic-pages","ranked-toil-evidence"]
context_rel
[]
skill_api_version
1
user-invocable
true
metadata
{"graph_root":true,"tier":"execution","dependencies":[],"capabilities":["recall_applicable_context","mine_supported_observations","curate_topic_pages","toil_mining"],"effects":["write_protected_drafts","update_authorized_topic_pages","write_requested_toil_report"],"canonical_status":"canonical","disposition":"keep_off_path"}
output_contract
bounded applicable evidence or no-match; reviewed topic-page updates or no-change; ranked toil evidence with support, limits and unresolved gaps
# Memory Use maintained experience only when it changes an action. Memory is optional: no mandatory recall at RPI entry, lesson at completion, worksheet, page quota or background mining. A trivial edit can proceed directly to implementation. ## Rules for any saved lesson or rule Apply these whenever a request would save or promote a lesson, including a request to turn an incident into a rule for an instruction file: 1. **Look for an existing entry first.** Search the selected `.context/` pages, external topic pages or the target instruction file (`AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, a team rules file). Amend the entry that already covers the behavior; add a new one only when none fits. If the final code, tests, comments or a doc already explain the reasoning, point there rather than save a copy; save only what they cannot show a later reader, such as ruled-out causes, why the fix works and what brings the failure back. Effort, a finished task or a large diff never qualifies a lesson. If nothing qualifies, save nothing and say why. 2. **Size the claim to its evidence.** One incident supports a narrow observation scoped to the conditions it actually had. A universal rule needs repeated independent occurrences and later reapplication. When a recurring correction is a mechanical slip that a lint rule, test or hook could catch, propose that check alongside the prose rule or in its place, as [Postmortem](../postmortem/SKILL.md) does for such a miss; a check fails where a rule can only ask. 3. **State all five fields:** applicability, action, support, limits and invalidation. Use the template below; an entry with no invalidation is incomplete. For an incident, applicability includes the exact error text or observable symptom, the words a later search will use. An instruction file such as `AGENTS.md` loads into every session, so its entry is usually one line: the action and when it applies, worded as information rather than an order to read, linking the project `.context/` page or the doc beside the governed code (never an external-bundle page from a checked-in file) that carries all five fields. A line that only restates what agents already do by default earns no place. 4. **Review before admission.** Draft outside Git. A fresh reviewer who is not the author checks factual support and disclosure of the exact text, paths and destination before it enters `.context/`, an instruction file such as `AGENTS.md`, or any Git object. Promoting an entry into an instruction file is a separate policy change owned by that file. 5. **Saving proves nothing.** Only later work can show that reuse changed an action and helped. Until then a saved rule is an untested hypothesis. ```markdown ### <one-line claim> - Applies when: <the conditions the evidence covered> - Action: <the check or step to take> - Support: <cited sources; number of independent occurrences> - Limits: <where it is untested or may not hold> - Invalidate when: <the change or contrary evidence that retires it, and how to check it> ``` Keep rare useful constraints; age or low frequency alone is no reason to delete them. Learning may also simplify or remove rules. ## Choose one operation | Need | Read on demand | |---|---| | An earlier constraint or source map may change the next action | [Find / recall](references/recall.md) | | Capture useful evidence from selected sources, episodes or corrections | [Capture / mine / learn](references/mine-learn.md) | | Update, qualify, consolidate or retire a supported claim | [Curate / qualify / retire](references/curate.md) | | Rank repeated operational friction in supplied history | [Toil evidence](references/toil.md) | | Trace a corrected claim or audit the loaded instruction set | [Instruction sources](references/instruction-sources.md) | Memory owns these operations; other roles link here instead of keeping their own procedures. Capture includes bounded source maps, verdicts, corrections and failed or harmful reuse; it is never a required completion step. Load only the selected operation's reference. The optional [OKF page profile](references/learn/okf-page-profile.md) checks structure only. ## One authority per fact BD or the caller's tracker owns work, status, dependencies and handoffs; Git owns content and delivery history; native sessions and CASS own episode evidence. Reviewed Markdown topic pages in a selected project `.context/` or an external bundle hold reusable claims as evidence, not another work account. Existing docs, ADRs and code keep their declared authority; a page points to those owners instead of copying their policy. Do not make one lesson file per session, copy a transcript lake, or silently initialize a memory store. For a selected project `.context/`, start at its small authored `README.md` map when relevant, then read likely pages and their current source owners with ordinary filesystem tools such as `rg` and `cat`; this needs neither BD nor AO. Reads create no directory, index or private import. The optional `ao config context` route supports external bundles and an explicitly bound canonical direct `<consumer>/.context`; it requires native BD and preserves the policy and identity bindings. Other consumer-overlapping roots remain refused. ## Access, storage and honest limits Use only sources already authorized for the task, owner, model/provider and exact destination. Read permission does not imply publication or Git storage. This lean path supports **public or already-cleared trial inputs only**. Neither this skill nor a prompt, worktree or same-user shell enforces restricted-source access, so do not retrieve restricted material through this path. The existing `ao session read-source` supported profile grants no broader or automatic transcript access. Unavailable and denied evidence remain explicit gaps; do not fetch then redact. Drafts and review proof stay in caller-selected protected external non-Git storage. Missing routing does not authorize a workspace fallback. Preserve requested legacy `.agents/` proof and unique evidence under owner policy. No blind TTL or delete operation is part of Memory. Labels and structural parsers do not prove isolation. `docs/adr/ADR-0016-state-tiers.md` owns these boundaries in a repository checkout; the operation references carry the installed rules. Saved pages, retrieval counts and structural checks prove no benefit. Only later work can demonstrate that reuse changed an action and helped its outcome; keep failed, harmful and no-change results. Mining is separately budgeted off-path and cannot delay finishing an already authorized change or alter its verdict.
在 GitHub 查看