用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/HashWarlock/clawdi-plugins --skill customer-support-kb-article命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | customer-support-kb-article |
| description | Create a knowledge base article from resolved support tickets and internal expertise |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"tags":["customer-support","knowledge-base","documentation"]}} |
When the user asks to create a knowledge base article, document a solution, or turn a resolved ticket into reusable documentation:
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Collect the complete resolution thread. Identify the original problem description, any troubleshooting steps attempted, and the final solution.
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Find other tickets that were resolved with similar solutions. This helps identify the most complete and accurate resolution steps, and reveals edge cases or variations that should be covered.
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Check for existing articles that overlap with the proposed topic. This helps avoid duplicates and identifies articles that should be updated rather than creating a net-new article.
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Gather technical details that should inform the article but may not have been fully explained in the support thread.
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Find engineering discussions about the root cause, known limitations, planned fixes, or recommended configurations that should be included in the article.
Use capability_execute with the following parameters:
Find any relevant vendor documentation, community solutions, or reference material that should be linked from the article.
Compose the article following knowledge base best practices:
## KB Article Draft
### Metadata
- **Title:** <clear, searchable title using the customer's language>
- **Category:** <troubleshooting / how-to / reference / getting-started>
- **Tags:** <comma-separated relevant tags>
- **Applies to:** <product area, plan tiers, or feature>
- **Last verified:** <current date>
---
### <Article Title>
#### Overview
<1-2 sentences describing what this article covers and who it is for>
#### Symptoms
<what the user observes when they encounter this issue>
- <symptom 1>
- <symptom 2>
- <error message if applicable>
#### Cause
<brief explanation of why this happens, in customer-friendly language>
#### Solution
##### Option 1: <primary solution name>
<description of when to use this option>
1. <step with specific instructions>
2. <step with specific instructions>
3. <step with specific instructions>
##### Option 2: <alternative solution if applicable>
<description of when to use this alternative>
1. <step>
2. <step>
#### Verification
<how the user can confirm the issue is resolved>
1. <verification step>
2. <expected result>
#### Additional Notes
- <edge cases or caveats>
- <related configuration that may affect this>
- <upcoming changes that may affect this solution>
#### Related Articles
- [<related article title>](<link_or_path>)
- [<related article title>](<link_or_path>)
#### References
- [<external reference>](<url>)
---
### Internal Notes (not published)
- **Source tickets:** <list of ticket IDs that informed this article>
- **Engineering context:** <relevant technical details for support agents>
- **Known gaps:** <anything this article does not cover that it should>
- **Review needed:** <yes/no -- flag if engineering review is recommended>
Ask the user to review the draft. Once approved, use capability_execute with:
Note: This is a side-effecting action. The router will request confirmation.
After publication, present a summary:
### Publication Summary
- **Article created:** <title>
- **Location:** <folder/path>
- **Status:** Draft (requires review before publishing to customers)
- **Existing articles to update:** <list any overlapping articles found in Step 3>
- **Suggested reviewers:** <based on engineering context found>
Remind the user that the article is in draft status and recommend having it reviewed by a subject matter expert before publishing to customers.