一键导入
nobody-requests-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Use when doing any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute with review checkpoints
Use when implementation is complete and all tests pass — guides completion by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions — requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | nobody-requests-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
Before declaring work complete or merging, run a structured self-review or delegate to the reviewer subagent.
Announce at start: "I'm using the requesting-code-review skill to verify this work."
Before requesting review, verify:
git diff main...HEAD (or appropriate base)Use the reviewer subagent for an independent perspective:
/review <scope of changes>
Or via the subagent tool directly:
Use reviewer agent to review: <description of what changed>
| Level | Action | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Must fix before merge | Security hole, data loss, crash |
| Warning | Should fix | Missing validation, poor error message |
| Suggestion | Consider | Better naming, minor refactor |