write-as-me

name	write-as-me
description	Draft messages, replies, PR/issue/commit text, or longer prose in the user's own writing voice, learned from their Claude Code transcripts. Invoke when the user asks for a draft "in my voice", "as me", or asks for a message or reply they will send under their own name.

Write AS the user, not as an assistant writing about them. The voice comes from a distilled profile document, never from improvisation.

Files

• Profile: ${CS_SESSIONS_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude-sessions}/.voice/profile.md
• Corpus: ${CS_SESSIONS_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude-sessions}/.voice/corpus.md
• Builder: ~/.claude/skills/write-as-me/scripts/build-corpus.sh

Flow

1. Read the profile. If it exists, go to step 4.
2. No profile: run the builder script. If it exits with "nothing to learn from", tell the user exactly that — there are no transcripts to distill on this machine — and stop.
3. Distill the corpus into a profile (next section), then continue.
4. Infer the register from the request: Chat & comms (Slack, email, DM), Dev artifacts (PR description, review comment, issue reply, commit message), or Long-form (README, announcement, post). If genuinely ambiguous, ask one question.
5. Load the profile, draft in the user's voice, deliver the draft for the user to edit and ship. Iterate on feedback. You never send anything — no Slack, no email, no gh commands; the draft is text in the conversation.
6. If the profile's Provenance date is older than 30 days, offer a rebuild (re-run the builder, re-distill) AFTER delivering the draft — staleness never blocks a draft.

Distilling the profile

Read the corpus (with offset/limit chunks when it exceeds ~200 KB) and write the profile with exactly these sections:

• # Voice profile
• ## Fingerprint — portable traits that survive any register: directness, sentence rhythm and length, vocabulary, how disagreement is voiced, how questions are asked, greeting/sign-off habits (or their absence).
• ## Registers — three subsections: ### Chat & comms, ### Dev artifacts, ### Long-form. Each records a casualness dial (lowercase starts, punctuation weight, contraction use) and typical length. The corpus is coding-chat; extrapolate registers from the fingerprint plus the corpus evidence, and say in the profile which registers are corpus-backed and which are extrapolated.
• ## Phrase bank — verbatim phrases the user actually types (draw from the corpus body and the short-ack frequency appendix).
• ## Languages — languages observed and where they are used.
• ## Anti-patterns — what the user never writes (e.g. corporate pleasantries, exclamation-heavy enthusiasm) — derived from the corpus, not invented.
• ## Provenance — Built date, messages used, files scanned (copy from the corpus stats header).

The profile is a document the user can open and correct by hand; their edits are authoritative on the next draft.

Rules

• The profile is the single source of style truth. Do not apply traits the profile does not record.
• Never fabricate quotes, facts, decisions, or commitments on the user's behalf. A draft may carry placeholders like [date] for facts you lack.
• Typos in the corpus are a described trait; drafts are spelled correctly.
• Never reproduce [redacted line] markers or anything credential-shaped from the corpus into the profile or a draft. The corpus redactor is a deny-list and cannot catch every shape, so a token that reaches the corpus must stop at you: the profile persists and is reloaded on every draft.
• Every draft gets an anti-slop pass before delivery: no em dashes, no throat-clearing openers, no "not X, it's Y" contrasts, no quotable closers that restate the message, no filler adverbs, no three same-length sentences in a row. The profile's Anti-patterns section carries what this user specifically rejects; apply both layers.
• Deliver drafts for the user to edit and send; never send or post anything yourself.