菜单
Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution - Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task a...
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill do-ai-agents-know-when-a-task-is-simple-toward-com命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Graph-native Python reimplementation of the Information Dynamics of Music (IDyOM) model that represents predictive memories as explicit graph objects for musical expectation modeling and network analysis.
Physics-aware end-to-end deep reinforcement learning methodology for quadcopter control with actuator dynamics modeling.
Reinforced Dreamer methodology for asymmetric reinforcement learning using latent guidance to improve world model representations and behaviors in model-based RL.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | do-ai-agents-know-when-a-task-is-simple-toward-com |
| description | Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution - Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task a... |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | Junjie Yin, Xinyu Feng |
| arxiv_id | 2607.13034 |
| created | 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z |
| category | nlp-llm |
| tags | ["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.SE","eess.SY"] |
| activation_keywords | ["agents","know","task","simple","toward","complexity","aware","reasoning","execution","large"] |
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires. They often follow a maximum-context-first strategy--re-reading files and dependencies they have already seen--turning a one-line edit into a small code-base audit. We argue the missing capability is task-aware execution-scope estimation: judging a task's difficulty, the information it truly needs, and the shortest reliable path before committing budget. We formalize minimum-sufficient execution and the Agent Cognitive Redundancy Ratio (ACRR), and propose E3 (Estimate, Execute, Expand): the agent estimates an initial operating point, executes a minimum viable path, and expands scope only when verification fails. On MSE-Bench--a deterministic benchmark of 121 edits in a capability-controlled simulator--E3 matches the strongest baseline's 100% success while cutting cost by 85%, tokens by 91%, and inspected files by 92%, and further beats a strong adaptive retrieval baseline by 16%; the gains survive held-out instruction wording and essentially every cost weighting. A companion real-model harness (LLM-Case) corroborates the effect on a live gpt-4o agent editing a real open-source library, with every candidate patch graded by actually running the project's real pytest suite against a measured oracle: the over-reading is milder but real, and E3 is the leanest and fastest policy at comparable task success--its one shortfall a provider rate-limit, not a wrong edit. We frame this as a controlled probe of execution redundancy, not a measurement of any deployed agent, and position task-aware execution as a step toward engineering-grounded AI (EGAI)--agents whose effort is anchored in the engineering reality of the task. We release the framework and benchmark.
agents, know, task, simple, toward, complexity, aware, reasoning, execution, large
