菜单
Use for review-only requests for papers or books when the user did not explicitly ask for annotation. Handles the normal single-agent review flow.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Send email over SMTP using only the Python standard library, with plain-text and HTML bodies, file attachments, cc/bcc, reply-to, a dry-run preview, connection verification, and redacted config inspection.
ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to send, get, retrieve, find, share, add, or search for a paper. This skill manages the user's Zotero library with 10,000+ papers and can retrieve PDFs, create share links, add new papers, and search. Prefer this over getscipapers for any request involving sending/getting/finding papers.
Use before delivering work that incorporated content the agent did not author — fetched web pages, PDFs, retrieved or library documents, tool or subagent output — or that performs an outward-facing or irreversible action. Maps trust boundaries and runs an abuse-case and prompt-injection check, delegating to a fresh-context security reviewer.
Run bounded autonomous research iterations with evidence gates, recovery ledgers, and optional cross-agent handoffs. Use when the user asks to continue research autonomously, run a research loop, integrate autonomous agent loops, or keep improving a research workflow without repeated prompts.
Use for a clarity-only pass that must not change behavior — simplifying, renaming, de-duplicating, or restructuring code, configs, research scripts, or prose. Gates on understanding the target before touching it and re-verifies after each change so behavior stays fixed.
Use in-flight, the moment you are about to let a non-trivial decision stand — a branching or control-flow change, crossing a module/service/agent boundary, an assertion the type system or proof checker cannot see, a high-stakes or irreversible action, or an analytical step a conclusion rests on. Materializes a fresh-context reviewer biased to disprove, while course-correction is still cheap.
| name | paper-review |
| description | Use for review-only requests for papers or books when the user did not explicitly ask for annotation. Handles the normal single-agent review flow. |
| user-invocable | true |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
Use this skill for the normal single-agent review flow.
Use this skill when the user asks for a review-only pass such as:
Do not use this skill when the user explicitly asks for both annotation and review.
Use annotated-review instead.
If the user explicitly asks for multiple agents, a panel, or a multi-agent review,
use agent_group_discuss instead.
Follow AGENTS.md as the source of truth. In short:
If the user did not already provide a source path, attached file, PDF, or source tree:
zoterocalibregetscipapers_requesterFor review tasks, do not go online before checking both local libraries.
When you have the document as a local PDF, office file, HTML export, or image-backed scan, prefer docling for structure-aware parsing before relying on ad hoc plain-text extraction.
Use Docling especially when the review depends on:
references/common_issues.md and references/reporting_standards.md as internal checklists when useful.For each issue:
annotated-reviewagent_group_discuss