一键导入
appeal-strategy-builder
Build data-driven appeal for disputed rejections. Includes appeal letter templates, evidence requirements, and appeals success strategies.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Build data-driven appeal for disputed rejections. Includes appeal letter templates, evidence requirements, and appeals success strategies.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Convert SCB scoring output into a prioritized remediation and re-evaluation plan with veto-first sequencing, pillar-weight impact sizing, and explicit recheck checkpoints.
Classify page/content type for SCB, resolve profile-specific weights and extension items, and output a normalized scoring manifest for downstream SCB skills and reports.
Setup automated monitoring for ongoing AdSense compliance. Configure rules, alert thresholds, and monitoring workflows to detect and prevent violations post-approval.
Entry point for all users. Comprehensive site diagnostic that identifies all compliance gaps across Content, Technical, UX, Policy, and Trust pillars. Generates prioritized action plan.
Verify all affiliate link disclosures for FTC, ASA, and international compliance. Finds undisclosed affiliate links and ensures proper format.
Run ARB-style audits across multiple sites, normalize results, rank client opportunities, and produce white-label delivery outputs for agencies and consultants.
| name | appeal-strategy-builder |
| description | Build data-driven appeal for disputed rejections. Includes appeal letter templates, evidence requirements, and appeals success strategies. |
Strategic guide for appealing disputed rejections. Includes evidence collection, letter templates, and appeal success strategies.
Used when a rejection decision is disputed rather than fixed-and-resubmit.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Phase | Post-rejection appeal |
| Upstream | User rejection notice + rejection-root-cause-analysis |
| ARB item coverage | References items cited in the rejection notice |
| Score mode | Should reference the original score_mode declared in the audit that preceded rejection |
An appeal is strongest when it references the specific ARB item IDs that were disputed, the score mode used in the audit, and clear evidence that the failing items have been addressed.
Build compelling appeal when:
Timeline:
Google's Review:
Success Rate: Varies widely (20-60% depending on reason)
Strong Evidence:
Example Package:
Evidence for Appeal:
├── before-after-metrics.pdf
├── content-audit-report.pdf
├── screenshots/
│ ├── homepage-before.png
│ ├── homepage-after.png
│ ├── mobile-before.png
│ └── mobile-after.png
├── sample-content/
│ ├── page1-before.txt
│ ├── page1-after.txt
│ └── 5 more examples...
└── improvements-summary.txt
Structure:
Template:
Subject: Appeal of AdSense Rejection - [Your Site URL]
Dear Google AdSense Review Team,
Thank you for reviewing my application for Google AdSense.
I received your decision on [date] with the feedback that
[quote rejection reason].
I respectfully disagree with this assessment and would like
to appeal this decision. Here's why:
SECTION 1: UNDERSTANDING YOUR FEEDBACK
I understand you found that [restate issue in your words].
I appreciate this feedback as it helped me identify areas
for improvement.
SECTION 2: WHAT I'VE FIXED
In response to your feedback, I have made the following
substantial improvements:
1. [Fix 1]: [What was wrong] → [What I did to fix it]
- Evidence: [Link to example or metric]
2. [Fix 2]: [What was wrong] → [What I did to fix it]
- Evidence: [Link to example or metric]
3. [Fix 3]: [What was wrong] → [What I did to fix it]
- Evidence: [Link to example or metric]
SECTION 3: EVIDENCE OF IMPROVEMENT
I have attached detailed evidence including:
- Before/after content audit results
- Screenshots showing improvements
- Independent audit reports
- Policy compliance documentation
- Sample pages showing content quality
These improvements represent a significant commitment to
meeting AdSense standards and providing value to users.
SECTION 4: CURRENT STATUS
My site now:
- Contains [X pages] with [Y+ words] of original content
- Passes [specific audits/criteria]
- Has [specific improvements] implemented
- Complies with all Google policies
I believe my site now meets all AdSense requirements and
respectfully request reconsideration.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I'm happy to
provide additional information if needed.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Title]
[Contact Information]
---
Attachments:
- Improvement Evidence Package
- Screenshots
- Audit Reports
Appeal Angle: Quality, not quantity
"You found my content had low value. However, [I have
demonstrated that]:
- Content has grown from [150 words avg] to [500+ words]
- Added [citations, examples, original data]
- Received [X user comments/shares] showing engagement
- Content serves specific [niche/audience] needs
- Similar [competitor examples] have lower quality
My site now provides genuine value to my target audience."
Evidence:
Appeal Angle: Substantial improvements made
"You found UX issues. I have since:
- Removed full-screen pop-ups
- Relocated ads below content
- Made site fully mobile-responsive
- Improved load time from [X] to [Y]
- Fixed all accessibility issues
My site now provides excellent UX as evidenced by
[test results, audits, metrics]."
Evidence:
Appeal Angle: All technical requirements met
"You cited technical issues. I have implemented:
- Full HTTPS/SSL encryption
- XML sitemap and robots.txt
- Mobile-responsive design
- Core Web Vitals optimization
- All requirements per [link to requirements]
All technical audits now pass."
Evidence:
Appeal Angle: Proper disclosure and compliance
"You found concerns about affiliate practices. However:
- All affiliate links now have clear FTC disclosures
- Disclosures are prominent and easy to find
- Privacy policy fully complies with regulations
- Content is original and valuable beyond affiliate links
- Affiliate content is [X%] of total site"
Evidence:
Higher Success Likelihood:
Lower Success Likelihood:
Common Outcomes:
Appeal Accepted (20-40% of appeals)
Appeal Denied, Same Reason (40-60% of appeals)
Appeal Denied, Different Reason (10-20% of appeals)
Options:
Related Skills:
rejection-root-cause-analysisresubmission-readiness-check