| name | rejection-root-cause-analysis |
| description | Analyze Google rejection notices to identify root causes. Maps Google's feedback to specific ARB criteria and provides prioritized remediation paths. |
Rejection Root Cause Analysis
Analyze your Google AdSense rejection notice to understand exactly why you were rejected and what needs to be fixed.
Scope Context
Entry point for the rejection recovery path. Maps Google's feedback to specific ARB item IDs and declares the scope for downstream audits.
| Field | Value |
|---|
| Phase | Post-rejection analysis |
| Downstream | recovery-action-plan, appeal-strategy-builder |
| ARB item coverage | All pillars (CI, PC, TH, UX, TD, SI) — scope depends on rejection type |
| Score mode declared | Core 79 + Profile for targeted re-audit; Full 105 when Google cites broad quality issues |
Output must include:
recommended_score_mode: the scope to use for follow-up audits
primary_site_type: to select the correct extension profile
mapped_items: list of ARB item IDs matched to each rejection reason
Purpose
Transform rejection notice into actionable insights:
- Map Google's feedback to specific ARB criteria
- Identify root causes vs. symptoms
- Prioritize fixes
- Create targeted remediation plan
- Prevent re-rejection
Quick Start
Input: Google rejection notice (text or screenshot)
Output: Root cause analysis + ARB mapping + remediation priorities
Time: 15-30 minutes
Workflow
Step 1: Extract Rejection Reason
Review Google's email for key phrases:
- "Policy violation"
- "Low-value content"
- "Spam practices"
- "Deceptive design"
- "Technical issues"
Step 2: Map to ARB Criteria
Google says... → ARB Criteria:
| Google's Feedback | Likely Criteria | Common Root Cause |
|---|
| "Low-value content" | CI01-CI03 | Thin pages, lack of depth, copied content |
| "Poor user experience" | UX02-UX06 | Intrusive ads, deceptive design, poor layout |
| "Deceptive practices" | PC04, PC06 | Misleading claims, false health claims |
| "Multiple policy violations" | PC01-PC08 | Prohibited content present |
| "Technical issues" | TH01-TH05 | HTTPS missing, broken links, sitemap issues |
| "Insufficient contact information" | TD | Missing about/contact page |
| "Health/financial claims" | PC04-PC05 | Misinformation, unverified claims |
Step 3: Categorize Issues
By Severity:
- Critical: Blocks all reapplications until fixed
- High: Likely re-rejection if not fixed
- Medium: May cause re-rejection
- Low: Minor issue, unlikely to affect decision
By Effort:
- Quick: <1 hour to fix
- Medium: 1-8 hours
- Complex: 1-5 days
- Extensive: 1+ weeks
Step 4: Create Action Plan
Address critical + quick fixes first
Step 5: Document Changes
Track what was fixed for resubmission
Common Rejection Reasons & Root Causes
"Low-Value Content" (CI)
Google Feedback:
"Your site contains pages with insufficient original, high-quality content that provides value to users."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (2-6 weeks):
- Identify all pages <300 words
- Expand to 300-1000+ words
- Add unique perspective
- Remove duplicates
- Consolidate similar pages
- Verify with audit tool
"Poor User Experience" (UX)
Google Feedback:
"Your site has issues that negatively impact the user experience, such as intrusive ads or deceptive design."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (1-2 weeks):
- Remove or delay pop-ups
- Relocate ads below fold
- Add real close buttons
- Ensure mobile responsiveness
- Improve navigation structure
- Add viewport meta tag
"Health Misinformation" (PC05)
Google Feedback:
"Your site contains health-related content that goes against scientific consensus or promotes dangerous practices."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (1-3 weeks):
- Identify all health claims
- Fact-check against WHO, CDC, peer-reviewed studies
- Remove false claims OR add disclaimers
- Cite scientific studies
- Recommend consulting doctors
- Remove absolute language ("cures", "guarantees")
"Deceptive Content" (PC04)
Google Feedback:
"Your site contains deceptive or misleading information designed to manipulate users."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (3-7 days):
- Audit all claims for accuracy
- Remove false claims
- Add supporting evidence
- Use conservative language
- Add disclaimers
- Cite sources
"No Contact Information" (TD)
Google Feedback:
"Your site lacks sufficient contact information or transparency."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (1-2 days):
- Create about page with:
- Company background
- Author credentials
- Team photos
- Company mission
- Add contact page with:
- Contact form
- Email address
- Phone number
- Physical address
- Add author bios to content
"Spam Indicators" (SI)
Google Feedback:
"Your site shows signs of spam or manipulative practices."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (1-2 weeks):
- Audit for keyword stuffing
- Remove hidden text/links
- Ensure same content for all users
- Audit inbound/outbound links
- Verify all content is original/valuable
- Remove auto-generated pages
"Technical Issues"
Google Feedback:
"Technical problems prevent us from properly reviewing your site."
Root Causes:
Fix Strategy (1-4 hours):
- Enable HTTPS immediately
- Create/update XML sitemap
- Verify robots.txt allows crawling
- Fix broken links
- Optimize performance
- Test with Google Search Console
Rejection Analysis Template
# Rejection Analysis Report
## Original Rejection Reason
[Copy Google's exact feedback]
## Root Cause Assessment
### Primary Causes
- [ ] [Issue 1] - [Severity: Critical/High/Medium]
- [ ] [Issue 2] - [Severity: ...]
### Contributing Factors
- [ ] [Issue 3]
- [ ] [Issue 4]
## ARB Criteria Mapping
- Primary: [CI01, CI02, etc.]
- Secondary: [TH01, TH02, etc.]
## Fix Priority
### Week 1 (Critical)
1. [Fix 1] - [1-2 hours]
2. [Fix 2] - [2-4 hours]
### Week 2 (High)
3. [Fix 3] - [4-8 hours]
4. [Fix 4] - [Ongoing]
### Week 3+ (Medium)
5. [Fix 5]
## Estimated Timeline
Total: 2-4 weeks
## Success Criteria
- [ ] All critical issues resolved
- [ ] Re-audit shows improvement
- [ ] No remaining policy violations
Common Patterns
Pattern 1: Multiple Small Issues
Signs: "We found several issues..."
Approach: Fix each category systematically
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Pattern 2: Single Major Issue
Signs: "Your site contains..."
Approach: Focus on that category
Timeline: 1-2 weeks
Pattern 3: Low-Value Content
Signs: "Insufficient original content"
Approach: Expand thin pages, add unique value
Timeline: 3-6 weeks
Pattern 4: UX/Design Issues
Signs: "Poor user experience"
Approach: Remove pop-ups, optimize layout
Timeline: 1-2 weeks
Next Steps
- Complete this analysis (15-30 min)
- Review in
recovery-action-plan skill
- Execute fixes using relevant improvement guides
- Re-verify with
resubmission-readiness-check
- Resubmit when ready
Related Skills:
- Create action plan →
recovery-action-plan
- Verify fixes →
resubmission-readiness-check
- Appeal (if disputing) →
appeal-strategy-builder