菜单
Performs thorough code reviews for Flutter/Dart pull requests and merge requests. Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or a set of changed files. Follows a structured checklist covering correctness, security, style, testing, and documentation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Structures Flutter apps using layered architecture (UI / Logic / Data) with feature-first file organization. Use when creating new features, designing the project structure, adding repositories/services/view models (or cubits/providers/notifiers), or wiring dependency injection. State management agnostic.
Implements Flutter state management using the bloc library (Bloc and Cubit). Use when creating new features, screens, or state management logic with bloc/cubit, modeling state, wiring Flutter widgets to blocs, or writing bloc/cubit unit tests.
Applies Dart 3 language features in Flutter/Dart code. Use when writing if-else or switch statements, creating new classes, or deciding between a data class and a record.
Replace the usage of `expect` and similar functions from `package:matcher` to `package:checks` equivalents.
Applies Effective Dart guidelines in Flutter/Dart code. Use when writing or reviewing Dart code for naming conventions, types, style, imports, file structure, usage patterns, documentation, testing, widgets, state management, or performance.
Provides best practices for Flutter app architecture, including layered architecture, data flow, state management patterns, and extensibility guidelines.
| name | code-review |
| description | Performs thorough code reviews for Flutter/Dart pull requests and merge requests. Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or a set of changed files. Follows a structured checklist covering correctness, security, style, testing, and documentation. |
This skill defines how to perform structured, objective code reviews.
Use this skill when:
main, master, develop, or equivalent).For every changed file, check:
| Area | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Location | File is in the correct directory |
| Naming | File name follows naming conventions |
| Responsibility | The file's responsibility is clear; reason for its change is understandable |
| Readability | Variable, function, and class names are descriptive and consistent |
| Logic & correctness | No logic errors or missing edge cases |
| Maintainability | Code is modular; no unnecessary duplication |
| Error handling | Errors and exceptions are handled appropriately |
| Security | No input validation issues; no secrets committed to code |
| Performance | No obvious performance issues or inefficiencies |
| Documentation | Public APIs, complex logic, and new modules are documented |
| Test coverage | New or changed logic has sufficient tests |
| Style | Code matches the project's style guide and coding patterns |
For generated files: confirm they are up-to-date and not manually modified.
Provide your review as a chat response, covering conclusions and recommendations per file, including: