Skip to main content

ix-debug

Root cause analysis — trace execution path to a failure, narrow candidates, read minimal source only at suspected failure points.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
ix-infrastructure/ix-gemini-plugin
最近来源活动
2026年5月17日 23:17
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
0
分支
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
ix-debug
description
Root cause analysis — trace execution path to a failure, narrow candidates, read minimal source only at suspected failure points.
## Goal Answer: where in the execution path is this likely failing, and why? Stop once you have 1-3 root cause candidates with supporting evidence. If the Ix runtime is unavailable, `ix_status` will report this; fall back to grep + file reads. ## Preferred path — unified query For most cases: ``` ix_query({ mode: "debug", targets: [$ARGUMENTS], query: $ARGUMENTS }) ``` Use the returned `preview_markdown` as the primary analysis. Supplement below if candidates need confirmation. ## Phase 1 — Locate the entry point (always) Call: `ix_locate({ symbol: $ARGUMENTS })` If `$ARGUMENTS` is a symptom description, also call: - `ix_text({ pattern: $ARGUMENTS, limit: 10 })` ## Phase 2 — Explain (always) Call: `ix_explain({ symbol: <entry-point> })` Classify: boundary (unexpected input), orchestrator (wrong sequencing), utility (wrong assumptions by caller). Stop if: the explanation makes the failure source obvious. ## Phase 3 — Trace the execution path Call: `ix_trace({ symbol: <entry-point> })` Look for: state validation, cross-subsystem calls, high-callee-count functions. Narrow to 1-3 most suspicious nodes. ## Phase 4 — Callers (if failure might come from upstream) Call: `ix_callers({ symbol: <entry-point> })` ## Phase 5 — Targeted code read (at most 2 calls) For each root cause candidate (max 2), read the source file at the relevant line range. Hard limit: 2 source reads maximum. ## Output ```text ## Debug: [entry point] **Execution path:** [entry-point] -> [step] -> [step] -> [suspected failure point] **Root cause candidates:** 1. [function/file] — [reason: what assumption might be wrong] 2. [function/file] — [reason] **Evidence:** - [what graph data supports each candidate] - [what code read revealed, if any] **Confidence:** [high / medium / low] — [why] **Next steps:** - Add logging at [specific point] to confirm - Check [specific edge case] in [function] ```
在 GitHub 查看