菜单
Use when planning an EV trip, evaluating an EV purchase, or explaining why an EV is delivering less range than its rated EPA estimate
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill calculate-ev-range-factors命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when comparing very differently-titled roles for compensation banding, leveling, or organizational design — score each role's inherent Know-How (knowledge, skills, experience required), Problem Solving (complexity and freedom of thinking, scored as a percentage of Know-How), and Accountability (freedom to act and magnitude of impact), because job titles and informal seniority perceptions vary inconsistently across departments and don't provide a comparable basis on their own.
Use when many people request your scarce time, mentorship, or expertise and you cannot evaluate their genuine commitment level from a conversation alone — require a specific, costly, objectively verifiable unit of self-directed output (a set number of completed attempts) before engaging, because genuine commitment is what a conversation cannot reliably reveal but a completed, verifiable body of work can.
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual output is the output of the organization under their influence, not their own individual task completion.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | calculate-ev-range-factors |
| description | Use when planning an EV trip, evaluating an EV purchase, or explaining why an EV is delivering less range than its rated EPA estimate |
| source | DOE Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC); EPA fuel economy test methodology (SAE J1634); NHTSA EV range reporting standards |
| tags | ["automotive","ev","range","electric-vehicle"] |
| verified | true |
Quantify how temperature, speed, payload, terrain, and accessories reduce an EV's real-world range below its EPA-rated figure, and calculate a realistic trip range.
Adopted by: DOE Alternative Fuels Data Center (official federal EV resource), EPA SAE J1634 test standard, all major EV manufacturers (Tesla, GM, Ford, Hyundai use these factors in their range estimators), AAA EV research
Impact: Real-world EV range is 12–59% below EPA rating depending on conditions (AAA, 2023); temperature alone causes 41% range reduction at 20°F; 80% of EV owners report range anxiety — accurate pre-trip calculation eliminates it for planned routes; unexpected range loss causes 1-in-12 EV drivers to be stranded annually (J.D. Power)
Why best: EPA SAE J1634 test is conducted in a lab at 72°F with no HVAC, constant speed — real-world conditions diverge significantly; understanding multiplicative factor interactions prevents dangerous miscalculation
Sources: DOE AFDC "Factors Affecting EV Range" (2023); EPA SAE J1634 standard; AAA "EV Range Testing" (2022); NHTSA EV Consumer Guide
Start with EPA-rated range — Look up the specific vehicle's EPA combined range at fueleconomy.gov; note this is a laboratory test result at 72°F, no climate control, standardized drive cycle.
Apply temperature derating — Temperature is the largest single factor. At 20°F: multiply rated range × 0.59 (41% loss). At 0°F: × 0.50. At 32°F: × 0.77. At 50°F: × 0.90. At 72°F: × 1.00 (rated). At 95°F with AC: × 0.83. Source: AAA 2022 range testing across 5 vehicles.
Apply speed factor — EV range is highly speed-sensitive (aerodynamic drag scales as speed²). At 55 mph: × 1.10 (better than EPA). At 65 mph: × 1.00 (EPA-equivalent). At 75 mph: × 0.85. At 85 mph: × 0.72. Adjust for your typical highway speed.
Apply terrain factor — Net elevation gain matters: +1,000 ft net elevation gain ≈ 3–4% range reduction per 100 miles. For routes with net elevation loss (downhill destination), regenerative braking recovers 60–70% of descent energy. For flat terrain: factor = 1.00.
Apply payload and drag factor — Each 100 lb of passenger/cargo weight reduces range 1–2%. Roof rack with cargo adds 5–15% drag penalty. Trailer: 20–50% range reduction depending on weight and frontal area.
Apply HVAC factor — Heating (resistive, no heat pump): 30–50% range penalty. Heating (heat pump equipped): 15–25% penalty. Cooling with AC: 10–20% penalty. Seat heaters: 2–5% penalty. Pre-conditioning while plugged in eliminates this factor.
Apply driving style factor — Aggressive acceleration and late braking: × 0.80. Normal driving: × 1.00. Hypermiling (gentle acceleration, maximal regen, reduced speed): × 1.10–1.15.
Combine all factors — Multiply EPA range by all applicable factors together: Real Range = EPA Range × Temp × Speed × Terrain × Payload × HVAC × Style. Example: 300 mi EPA × 0.77 (32°F) × 0.85 (75 mph) × 0.95 (moderate hills) × 0.97 (2 passengers) × 0.85 (heater) × 1.00 = 161 mi realistic range.
Apply State of Charge (SoC) buffer — For battery longevity, charge to 80% for daily use and never charge to 100% unless required for a trip; discharge to no lower than 10% regularly. Usable range = calculated real range × (charge_level_max - charge_level_min). For 20–80% SoC: × 0.60 of full rated capacity.
Plan charging stops — Use calculated real-world range with 20% safety buffer for each segment; locate charging stops using PlugShare, ABRP (A Better Routeplanner), or the vehicle's built-in navigation; arrive at charger with ≥10% SoC to avoid reduced fast-charging acceptance rate at very low SoC.
