用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill run-one-on-one命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when comparing very differently-titled roles for compensation banding, leveling, or organizational design — score each role's inherent Know-How (knowledge, skills, experience required), Problem Solving (complexity and freedom of thinking, scored as a percentage of Know-How), and Accountability (freedom to act and magnitude of impact), because job titles and informal seniority perceptions vary inconsistently across departments and don't provide a comparable basis on their own.
Use when many people request your scarce time, mentorship, or expertise and you cannot evaluate their genuine commitment level from a conversation alone — require a specific, costly, objectively verifiable unit of self-directed output (a set number of completed attempts) before engaging, because genuine commitment is what a conversation cannot reliably reveal but a completed, verifiable body of work can.
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual output is the output of the organization under their influence, not their own individual task completion.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | run-one-on-one |
| description | Use when preparing for or improving weekly one-on-one meetings between a manager and a direct report |
| source | Ben Horowitz "The Hard Thing About Hard Things" (2014); Manager Tools Podcast (Horstman & Auzenne) |
| tags | ["one-on-one","leadership","management","coaching","feedback","retention"] |
| verified | true |
Make every 1:1 a high-signal conversation that builds trust, surfaces problems early, and develops the direct report.
Adopted by: Manager Tools methodology used by 5M+ managers; Andy Grove formalized 1:1s at Intel as a core management tool Impact: Gallup research shows that managers who hold regular 1:1s reduce voluntary turnover by up to 25% and improve engagement scores by 3× compared to ad-hoc check-ins
Why best: The 1:1 is the primary tool for a manager to learn what is actually happening on the ground. It belongs to the direct report, not the manager — inverting the usual power dynamic creates psychological safety and honest reporting.
A manager notices a senior engineer has gone quiet in planning meetings. In the 1:1, asking "What's frustrating you lately?" reveals they feel their technical opinions are ignored. The manager commits to explicitly soliciting their input in the next three meetings. The engineer commits to stating their concern once in writing before meetings. Four weeks later, engagement improves measurably.