triage-bug-report

name	triage-bug-report
description	Use when a bug report is filed — to reproduce it, assess severity and priority, capture required context, and assign it before any diagnosis begins.
source	Mozilla "Bug Triage" process (wiki.mozilla.org/BMO/UserGuide/BugTriage); Kaner, Falk & Nguyen "Testing Computer Software" (Wiley, 1999); Google Testing Blog "Effective Bug Reports"; Microsoft "Triage" (docs.microsoft.com/devops)
tags	["bug-triage","defect-management","severity","priority","bug-report","issue-tracking","quality-assurance"]

Triage Bug Report

Reproduce the bug, classify it by severity and priority, capture complete environment context, and assign it — so developers receive actionable reports and no time is lost to "cannot reproduce."

Why This Is Best Practice

Adopted by: Mozilla has maintained a public bug triage process (wiki.mozilla.org) since Bugzilla's creation in 1998 — it is the most documented open-source triage process; Google's internal defect management practices are documented in the Google Testing Blog; Microsoft, Atlassian (Jira), and GitHub Issues all provide triage workflow guidance; Kaner, Falk & Nguyen's "Testing Computer Software" (Wiley, 1999) is the academic foundation for defect report quality standards Impact: Kaner et al. (1999): 40% of bug reports filed without structured triage are closed as "cannot reproduce" due to missing environment information — triage that captures reproduction steps eliminates this back-and-forth; Mozilla's structured triage process reduced median time-to-fix by 30% by ensuring bugs arrive at developers with complete reproduction steps; Google Testing Blog: developers spend 25–40% of bug-fix time reproducing bugs reported without structured context — triage moves this cost to the reporter (cheaper) vs the developer (more expensive) Why best: Untriaged bugs create three failure modes: (1) developers cannot reproduce them and close them unresolved, (2) P0 bugs sit in a backlog behind P3 noise, (3) duplicate reports create parallel fix efforts; structured triage eliminates all three; the alternative — letting reporters self-classify priority — consistently results in every bug being marked "critical" (reporter bias)

Sources: Kaner, Falk & Nguyen "Testing Computer Software" (Wiley, 1999) Ch. 5; Mozilla "BMO Bug Triage" (wiki.mozilla.org); Google Testing Blog "How Google Handles Bug Reports"; Wiegers "Creating a Software Engineering Culture" (Dorset House, 1996)

Steps

1. Attempt to reproduce the bug

Before any classification, reproduce the bug exactly as reported:

Checklist:
[ ] Follow the reported steps exactly (not your interpretation of them)
[ ] Use the exact reported environment (OS, version, browser, device)
[ ] Confirm the actual behavior matches what was reported
[ ] Confirm expected behavior is indeed different from actual

If reproducible: proceed to step 2.

If not reproducible:

• Mark status: "Needs More Info" (or equivalent in your tracker)
• Request specifically: "Cannot reproduce. Please provide: [what's missing — OS version, exact steps, account type, data state, etc.]"
• Do NOT close the report — "cannot reproduce" ≠ "does not exist"
• Set a follow-up reminder; close only if no response after 14 days

If intermittently reproducible:

• Document exact reproduction rate: "Reproduced 2/5 attempts"
• Note any differences between successful and failed reproduction attempts
• Classify as reproducible; note flakiness in the report

2. Classify severity

Severity describes the technical impact of the bug — independent of how many users are affected:

Severity	Definition	Examples
S1 — Critical	Data loss, data corruption, security vulnerability, complete system unavailability	Payments charged but not recorded; user data exposed to other users; app crashes on launch for all users
S2 — Major	Core feature broken with no workaround	Login fails; checkout cannot be completed; primary user action returns error
S3 — Moderate	Feature partially broken or has a workaround	Export fails but copy-paste works; search returns wrong results but filter works
S4 — Minor	Cosmetic, incorrect text, minor UI issue	Button label says "Cancle"; tooltip text is wrong; animation stutters

Severity is factual, not subjective. Assign based on impact, not urgency.

3. Classify priority

Priority describes when the bug should be fixed — depends on severity, user impact, and business context:

Priority	Definition	SLA
P0	Fix immediately — production is broken or users are at risk	Hours
P1	Fix this sprint — significant user-facing impact	Days
P2	Fix in the next 1–2 sprints — notable but not blocking	Weeks
P3	Fix when time allows — low impact or cosmetic	Backlog

Severity ≠ Priority:

• S1 bug on an internal admin tool used by 2 people → severity Critical, priority P1 (not P0)
• S4 bug on the homepage of a major marketing campaign → severity Minor, priority P1

Priority incorporates business context; severity does not. Triage assigns both independently.

4. Capture the required context

A complete bug report contains:

**Summary:** One sentence describing the incorrect behavior

**Steps to reproduce:**
1. [First step — specific action, not "go to the page"]
2. [Second step]
3. [...]

**Expected behavior:** What should happen

**Actual behavior:** What actually happens

**Environment:**
- OS: macOS 14.2 / Windows 11 / Ubuntu 22.04
- Browser/Client: Chrome 120.0.6099.109 / iOS 17.2 / Node 20.11
- Application version: 2.4.1 (build 20240115)
- Account type / role: Admin / Free tier / Guest
- Data state: Fresh account / After importing data / During checkout

**Frequency:** Always / Intermittent (N/M attempts) / Once

**Attachments:** Screenshot, screen recording, log output, HAR file

Minimum required fields before assignment:

• Steps to reproduce (specific, numbered)
• Expected vs actual behavior (both stated)
• Environment (at minimum: OS + version + app version)

If any minimum field is missing → request it (step 1 "Needs More Info") before assigning.

5. Check for duplicates

Before creating a new report:

# Search the issue tracker for related reports:
# - Same error message
# - Same feature area
# - Same steps
# - Recent reports (last 30 days) in same component

If a duplicate exists:

• Link the new report to the existing one ("Duplicate of #1234")
• Close the new report as duplicate
• Add any new environment information or reproduction steps from the duplicate to the original

Duplicate reports split developer attention and inflate bug counts. Merge them aggressively.

6. Assign to the right owner

Assign the bug to the team or individual responsible for the affected component:

Who to assign:
- Clear owner: assign directly to that developer or team queue
- Unclear owner: assign to tech lead for the affected area; they re-assign after reviewing
- Cross-team: assign to the team whose code the bug occurs in (even if caused by another team's input)
- Security bugs (S1 with security impact): assign to security team immediately; do NOT leave in public backlog

Security bugs require special handling:

• Mark as private/confidential in the issue tracker immediately
• Notify security team directly (Slack/email) — do not rely on tracker notification
• Do not describe the vulnerability in public comments

7. Set labels and milestone

Labels to apply:
- Severity label: severity:critical / severity:major / severity:moderate / severity:minor
- Priority label: priority:p0 / priority:p1 / priority:p2 / priority:p3
- Component: component:auth / component:checkout / component:api
- Type: type:bug (not type:feature, type:task)

Milestone:
- P0: current sprint or hotfix milestone
- P1: current or next sprint milestone
- P2/P3: backlog or unscheduled

Rules

• Never close "cannot reproduce" — mark "Needs More Info" and request specific missing context
• Severity describes technical impact; priority describes fix urgency — assign both independently
• Minimum required fields before assignment: steps to reproduce, expected/actual behavior, environment
• Security bugs (data exposure, auth bypass, injection): private immediately + notify security team directly
• Check for duplicates before creating; merge aggressively
• Reporter self-classification of priority is not final — triager assigns priority based on impact, not reporter urgency

Common Mistakes

• Closing "cannot reproduce" without requesting info: the bug may exist and only reproduce in specific environments or data states; always request missing context before closing
• Conflating severity and priority: "critical" priority because the CEO reported it — priority is business-driven; severity is technical-driven; keep them separate
• Accepting vague steps: "it doesn't work when I click the button" — which button? On which page? After which action? Accepting vague reports means developers will spend time reproducing that could be spent fixing
• Leaving security bugs public: S1 security bugs in a public tracker expose the vulnerability before it's fixed; private immediately, then notify

When NOT to Use

• Feature requests masquerading as bugs ("the button should be blue, not gray") — reclassify as feature request and route to product; do not apply bug triage process to enhancement requests
• Performance issues without a specific broken behavior — performance complaints that don't identify a regression or a threshold violation belong in performance review, not bug triage