菜单
Use when designing a zero-waste program for a household, business, or organization — applying the waste hierarchy (refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle, recover), mapping waste streams, identifying highest-volume reduction opportunities, and establishing measurement systems.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill design-zero-waste-system命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | design-zero-waste-system |
| description | Use when designing a zero-waste program for a household, business, or organization — applying the waste hierarchy (refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle, recover), mapping waste streams, identifying highest-volume reduction opportunities, and establishing measurement systems. |
| source | EPA Waste Hierarchy (40 CFR Part 246); Zero Waste International Alliance (ZWIA) Standard (2018); Connett "The Zero Waste Solution" (2013); True Zero Waste Certification Standards |
| tags | ["zero-waste","waste-reduction","sustainability","circular-economy","waste-management","environmental-management"] |
Design a zero-waste program by mapping all waste streams, applying the 5R hierarchy, identifying highest-volume reduction opportunities, and establishing measurement and accountability systems to track progress toward zero-waste-to-landfill targets.
Why best: Recycling-first approaches plateau at 40–60% diversion because contamination and processing limits cap what recycling alone can divert; the 5R hierarchy (refuse, reduce, reuse before recycle/recover) front-loads reduction at the source, which is the only path to the ≥90% diversion rates zero-waste certification requires. Adopted by: Zero Waste International Alliance (ZWIA) defines true zero waste as <10% of materials going to landfill or incineration. Companies achieving True Zero Waste certification include Subaru of Indiana (2004 — first zero-waste auto assembly plant), Interface (flooring), and Patagonia. The EU Circular Economy Action Plan (2020) and California's AB 939 mandate landfill diversion rates; multiple US cities (San Francisco, Seattle) achieved 80%+ diversion rates using systematic zero-waste design. Interface (carpet manufacturer) reduced waste-to-landfill by 96% over 15 years through systematic design, saving $400M in materials costs. Subaru's zero-waste program saved $5M/year after implementation. At household level, most US households generate ~4.4 lbs of waste per person per day; systematic zero-waste households reach 0.5–1 lb/day. The financial and environmental returns scale with organizational size.
Before designing the system, understand what is currently being discarded:
For businesses: include all waste streams — production scrap, packaging, office waste, food service waste. Each stream may require a different diversion strategy.
5R order of priority (refuse is better than recycle):
The hierarchy matters: recycling as a primary strategy only diverts 40–60% of materials due to contamination, processing limits, and unrecyclable materials. Refuse/reduce/reuse achieves higher diversion rates.
For each waste stream, design the physical system:
Place bins at every waste generation point; make the correct option the easy option.
Waste reduction is most effective at the source — before materials enter the system:
For businesses: update procurement policy; train purchasing staff; add supplier sustainability criteria.
Landfill diversion rate = (total waste − landfill/incineration) / total waste × 100%
Track monthly:
True Zero Waste certification target: ≥90% diversion rate sustained over time.
Identify when diversion rates stagnate: usually indicates contamination in recycling streams, non-recyclable materials in the waste audit, or missing collection infrastructure.
Zero-waste systems fail without consistent participation:
