菜单
Use when projecting investment growth, understanding the time value of money, or illustrating the cost of delay — e.g., "how much will $10k grow?", "Rule of 72?", "how much do I need to save monthly to reach $1M?", "what's the cost of waiting 5 years to invest?"
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill calculate-compound-interest命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when comparing very differently-titled roles for compensation banding, leveling, or organizational design — score each role's inherent Know-How (knowledge, skills, experience required), Problem Solving (complexity and freedom of thinking, scored as a percentage of Know-How), and Accountability (freedom to act and magnitude of impact), because job titles and informal seniority perceptions vary inconsistently across departments and don't provide a comparable basis on their own.
Use when many people request your scarce time, mentorship, or expertise and you cannot evaluate their genuine commitment level from a conversation alone — require a specific, costly, objectively verifiable unit of self-directed output (a set number of completed attempts) before engaging, because genuine commitment is what a conversation cannot reliably reveal but a completed, verifiable body of work can.
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual output is the output of the organization under their influence, not their own individual task completion.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | calculate-compound-interest |
| description | Use when projecting investment growth, understanding the time value of money, or illustrating the cost of delay — e.g., "how much will $10k grow?", "Rule of 72?", "how much do I need to save monthly to reach $1M?", "what's the cost of waiting 5 years to invest?" |
| source | Albert Einstein (attributed, origin disputed) on compound interest; Bernstein "The Four Pillars of Investing" (2002); Bogle "Common Sense on Mutual Funds" (1999); IRS future value tables |
| tags | ["finance","investing","compound-interest","time-value-of-money","future-value","rule-of-72","growth-projection"] |
| verified | true |
Apply the future value formula and Rule of 72 to project investment growth, illustrate the cost of delay, and solve for required savings rates.
Adopted by: Compound interest calculations are foundational to every financial planning framework — used by CFPs, actuaries, and every personal finance curriculum (Dave Ramsey, Ramit Sethi, Vanguard investor education). The Rule of 72 is taught in every business school and CFA program as a mental math shortcut. Impact: Compound interest is the mechanism behind every retirement plan — not investment selection. Vanguard research shows that time in market explains 88% of the variance in long-term wealth outcomes; investment selection explains less than 5%. Understanding compound growth quantitatively transforms abstract future goals into actionable present decisions. Why best: Intuitive understanding of compound growth is systematically wrong — humans underestimate exponential growth. Calculating actual numbers (not approximate mental models) reveals that the cost of 5 years of delay is not 5 years of contributions but exponentially more — converting abstraction into urgency.
Future Value of a lump sum:
FV = PV × (1 + r)^n
Where PV = present value, r = annual rate (decimal), n = years.
Example: $10,000 at 8% for 30 years → $10,000 × (1.08)^30 = $100,627.
Future Value of regular contributions (annuity):
FV = PMT × [(1 + r)^n − 1] / r
Where PMT = monthly contribution (use r/12 and n×12 for monthly).
Example: $500/month at 7% for 30 years → $566,765.
Required monthly contribution to reach a goal:
PMT = FV × r / [(1 + r)^n − 1]
Example: Need $1,000,000 in 30 years at 7% → $886/month.
Apply the Rule of 72 for quick doubling estimates: Years to double = 72 ÷ annual return %. At 6%: 72 ÷ 6 = 12 years to double. At 8%: 72 ÷ 8 = 9 years to double. At 10%: 72 ÷ 10 = 7.2 years to double.
Calculate the cost of delay: Start at 25 vs. 30, same $500/month at 7%: at 25 → $2.4M by 65; at 30 → $1.7M by 65. Cost of 5-year delay: $700,000 — not 5 × $6,000 ($30,000) in contributions, but $700,000 in forgone compounding.
Account for inflation (real return): Real return = nominal return − inflation. Use 7% nominal → 4–4.5% real (net of ~2.5% inflation). Future purchasing power: $1,000,000 nominal in 30 years = ~$475,000 in today's dollars.
Model fee impact: 1% fee drag on $500/month at 8% for 30 years: fee scenario (7%) → $566,765 vs. no-fee (8%) → $680,239. Cost of 1% annual fee: $113,474 — illustrating why low-cost index funds matter.
How much to save to retire at 60 with $2M, starting at 30? 30 years at 7% return. PMT = $2,000,000 × (0.07/12) / [(1 + 0.07/12)^360 − 1] = $1,772/month. At 7% real: $1,772/month adjusted for inflation. Rule of 72 check: money doubles every 10.3 years (72÷7). From 30→60: three doublings. $1k today → $8k at 60. Need $2M ÷ 8 = $250k equivalent contribution base. Ballpark consistent.
Finance disclaimer: This skill encodes professional best practices for educational purposes. It is not financial advice. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
