菜单
Use when writing an academic paper or research report — applying citation strategy to select authoritative sources, use citations accurately and ethically, manage reference styles (APA, MLA, Chicago), and cite strategically to build credibility and enable traceability of claims.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill apply-academic-citation-strategy命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when comparing very differently-titled roles for compensation banding, leveling, or organizational design — score each role's inherent Know-How (knowledge, skills, experience required), Problem Solving (complexity and freedom of thinking, scored as a percentage of Know-How), and Accountability (freedom to act and magnitude of impact), because job titles and informal seniority perceptions vary inconsistently across departments and don't provide a comparable basis on their own.
Use when many people request your scarce time, mentorship, or expertise and you cannot evaluate their genuine commitment level from a conversation alone — require a specific, costly, objectively verifiable unit of self-directed output (a set number of completed attempts) before engaging, because genuine commitment is what a conversation cannot reliably reveal but a completed, verifiable body of work can.
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual output is the output of the organization under their influence, not their own individual task completion.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | apply-academic-citation-strategy |
| description | Use when writing an academic paper or research report — applying citation strategy to select authoritative sources, use citations accurately and ethically, manage reference styles (APA, MLA, Chicago), and cite strategically to build credibility and enable traceability of claims. |
| source | APA "Publication Manual" 7th ed. (2020); MLA "Handbook" 9th ed. (2021); Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed. (2017); Purdue OWL citation guides; Belcher "Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks" (2019); Booth et al. "The Craft of Research" 4th ed. (2016) |
| tags | ["writing","academic-writing","citation","research","apa","bibliography","academic-integrity"] |
Apply citation strategy in academic writing — selecting authoritative sources, using citations accurately and ethically, managing reference styles correctly, and citing strategically to build argument credibility and maintain traceable claims.
Why best: Citation is the mechanism academic disciplines use to make claims verifiable and to separate original contribution from prior work; without it, scholarly communication collapses into unverifiable assertion. Adopted by: The APA Publication Manual (7th ed.) is required by thousands of social science, education, and psychology journals. The MLA Handbook is required in most humanities disciplines. The Chicago Manual of Style governs history, literature, and publishing. All major university academic integrity policies define citation requirements as part of scholarly standards. Booth, Colomb & Williams' "The Craft of Research" is the most widely used academic writing methods text and covers citation as an integral part of research. Impact: Citation performs two functions: credibility (showing that claims are grounded in established research) and traceability (enabling readers to verify sources and locate original materials). Papers with no citations or insufficient citation cannot be evaluated for accuracy; papers with incorrect citations undermine the reader's ability to verify. Academic integrity violations (plagiarism, fabricated citations) result in retraction, degree revocation, and professional sanctions that persist permanently in academic records.
Citation required:
Citation not required:
The "any competent reader would know this" test: if a reader in the field would challenge this claim and ask "where does this come from?", it requires a citation. If the claim is universally accepted without question, it does not.
Not all sources are equal; citation strategy requires selecting sources appropriate to the claim:
Tier 1 (strongest):
Tier 2 (acceptable with context):
Tier 3 (use only when better sources unavailable):
Avoid for academic writing:
Primary vs. secondary sources:
The accurate citation rule: the citation should support exactly the claim being made; a reader who retrieves the source should find the cited information in the location indicated
Common errors:
Direct quotation rule: direct quotes must be verbatim; any change to spelling, punctuation, or wording requires [brackets] for additions, ellipsis (...) for omissions, or [sic] for preserved errors in the original.
APA 7th edition (most common in social sciences, education, psychology):
MLA 9th edition (humanities):
Chicago 17th (history, literature, many humanities):
Reference management tools:
Strategic citation builds the argument; defensive citation buries the reader in noise:
The conversation framing (Graff & Birkenstein): citation connects the current paper to the ongoing scholarly conversation; citations are not just acknowledgments but entries into dialogue: "Building on Jones (2019), I extend the analysis to..." or "While Smith (2020) found X, this study finds Y, suggesting..."
