score-against-a-written-pass-line

# Score against a written pass line ## What it does Scores every part against the pass line as it was written before use, and keeps the evidence beside each score with the assessor who gave it, so a disputed score can be reread rather than re-argued. ## Where it happens The agent does this in one activity across one reference process. Each one names the activity as that process words it. - **Score Against the Standard** - `ref/rev/certify-a-seller`, activity 13 - [Certify a Seller](../../../../processes/revenue-operations/certify-a-seller.md) ## What to record Per person: the request, naming who is put forward, for which job and by when. The parts that must be proved, each with the reason a customer would notice it. The assessment as checked, item by item, each item naming the part of the standard it tests, and every item removed with the reason. The assessors, and the conflicts that were ruled out. What the assessors were briefed on, at a version. The sitting as scheduled, including what the person was told they may bring. A score per part, with the evidence it was given on and the assessor who gave it, kept so a disputed score can be reread rather than re-argued. A score set aside for conflict is kept marked as set aside, never deleted. The signed result, who signed it, what it covers, and the condition and expiry on any conditional pass. The certificate with its issue date, requirement version and expiry. Attendance by name against the list of who must be told. The later report setting scores against what those people did. That contract covers every activity this abstract agent takes on, and it is repeated in `com.agentcatalog.agent/RECORDS.md`. What the abstract agent does not do is in `com.agentcatalog.agent/NOT.md`.