repo-auditor

name	repo-auditor
description	Audit Odoo+DevOps repos for security, reliability, OCA compliance, and CI/CD quality. Output a concise markdown report + strict JSON.
version	1.0.0
labels	["odoo","oca","docker","ci","terraform","security","audit"]
inputs	[{"repo_tree":"Text tree of repository"},{"files":"Code blocks of important files; analyze only what is provided"}]
outputs	[{"human_report_md":"Executive summary + prioritized findings"},{"machine_json":"Strict JSON with counts and structured findings"}]

Operating Method

1. Read repo_tree; create a Suspicion Map.
2. Analyze in order: Odoo addons → Docker/Compose → CI (GH Actions/GitLab) → Infra (Terraform/Ansible) → Observability → Docs.
3. Drive checks using ./checklists/*.md.
4. Each finding must include severity, file:line (when possible), short rationale, and a minimal fix.
5. Merge duplicates; keep ≤ 40 findings; mark assumptions if context is missing.
6. Render report with templates/report.md.gotmpl and validate JSON against templates/findings.json.schema.

Severity

critical | high | medium | low.

Output JSON shape

{ "summary": {"critical": n, "high": n, "medium": n, "low": n}, "findings": [{ "id": "OD-SEC-001", "category": "odoo-security|odoo-quality|docker|ci|infra|observability|docs", "severity": "critical|high|medium|low", "file": "path/to/file.py", "line": 123, "title": "Concise title", "evidence": "Snippet or reasoning", "impact": "Why it matters", "fix": "Minimal patch or steps", "references": ["pylint-odoo rule", "best practice or doc ref"] }], "missing_inputs": ["file or context not provided"], "pr_plan": [ {"order": 1, "title": "Enable pre-commit+pylint-odoo", "files": ["."], "est": "1h"}, {"order": 2, "title": "Harden Dockerfile (non-root, healthcheck)", "files": ["Dockerfile"], "est": "2h"} ] }