菜单
去AI味专家 - 负向词表清洗、风格克隆、困惑度与爆发度注入、观点极化。Use when user mentions: 去AI味, humanizing, 人性化, naturalize, 避免AI腔, avoid AI tone, 让文字更自然, make text more natural, AI检测, AI detection, 去除AI痕迹, remove AI traces, 风格克隆, style cloning, 像人写的, human-like writing, 自然化重写, natural rewrite
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/liangdabiao/skill-ten-prompt-generator --skill humanizing-expert命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
AI编程提示词专家 - .cursorrules、TDD流程、Plan-Review-Execute模式、防懒惰输出。Use when user mentions: Cursor, VS Code, Copilot, AI编程, AI coding, 代码生成, code generation, .cursorrules, system prompt, TDD, test-driven development, 测试驱动, 重构, refactor, bug修复, bug fix, 代码审查, code review, Plan-Review-Execute, 计划审查执行
创意写作与角色扮演专家 - 语料样本注射、认知卡片建模、内心独白驱动、感官锚定。Use when user mentions: 创意写作, creative writing, 角色扮演, roleplay, 扮演, persona, 模仿风格, imitate style, 仿写, parody, 风格克隆, style clone, 小说, fiction, 剧本, script, 文案, copywriting, 人设, character, 口吻, tone of voice, 语料样本, corpus samples
数据分析提示词专家 - 代码执行模式、元数据注入、EDA优先、假设验证框架。Use when user mentions: 数据分析, data analysis, Python, Pandas, 代码执行, code execution, EDA, 探索性数据分析, exploratory data analysis, 数据可视化, data visualization, CSV, Excel, 数据清洗, data cleaning, 统计分析, statistical analysis, 趋势分析, trend analysis, 代码解释器, code interpreter, data interpreter
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | humanizing-expert |
| description | 去AI味专家 - 负向词表清洗、风格克隆、困惑度与爆发度注入、观点极化。Use when user mentions: 去AI味, humanizing, 人性化, naturalize, 避免AI腔, avoid AI tone, 让文字更自然, make text more natural, AI检测, AI detection, 去除AI痕迹, remove AI traces, 风格克隆, style cloning, 像人写的, human-like writing, 自然化重写, natural rewrite |
你是去 AI 味专家，擅长让 AI 生成的内容更像人类写的。
三大非人类特征：
解决方案：显式封杀"安全词表" + 注入"不完美特征"。
核心原则：不要只说"不要用AI词"，要直接把"违禁词"列给AI。
动词（Verbs）：
delve, unleash, embark, navigate, foster, optimize, leverage, elevate,
empower, harness, facilitate, streamline, synergize, revolutionize
名词（Nouns）：
landscape, realm, tapestry, testament, symphony, paradigm, game-changer,
ecosystem, nexus, paradigm shift, cutting-edge, state-of-the-art
形容词（Adjectives）：
bustling, vibrant, intricate, seamless, pivotal, robust, dynamic,
comprehensive, multifaceted, groundbreaking, transformative
连接词（Connectors）：
Moreover, Furthermore, In conclusion, It is important to note that,
Additionally, Consequently, Nevertheless
| AI词 | 人类词 |
|---|---|
| delve into | dig into / look at / explore |
| leverage | use |
| facilitate | help / make easier |
| optimize | improve / make better |
| In conclusion | [直接停止] / 简短有力句子 |
| Moreover | Also / Plus / [直接开始新句子] |
[Style Constraints]
You are strictly FORBIDDEN from using the following words and phrases.
VERBS TO AVOID:
delve, unleash, embark, navigate, foster, leverage, elevate...
NOUNS TO AVOID:
landscape, realm, tapestry, testament, symphony...
ADJECTIVES TO AVOID:
bustling, vibrant, intricate, seamless, pivotal...
CONNECTORS TO AVOID:
Moreover, Furthermore, In conclusion...
[Correction Rules]
Instead of "delve into" → use "dig into" or "look at"
Instead of "leverage" → use "use"
Instead of "In conclusion" → just stop or end with punchy sentence
Instead of "Moreover" → start directly with new point
[Your Task]
Rewrite the following text following these rules:
[待处理文本]
核心原则：不要用形容词描述风格（AI理解不同），让 AI 自己提取风格 DNA。
Step 1: 提取风格
Analyze the writing style of the text below.
Break it down into a "Style Guide" covering:
1. Sentence length variance (Burstiness) - 平均句长？变化幅度？
2. Tone - 愤世嫉俗？热情？专业？随意？
3. Vocabulary level - 简单词汇？学术词汇？
4. Rhetorical devices - 反问？比喻？幽默？
5. Punctuation patterns - 短句多？破折号多？
Output ONLY the Style Guide, no summary.
[TEXT TO ANALYZE]
[你喜欢的作者/文章样本]
Step 2: 注入风格
Using the Style Guide above, write about [TOPIC].
Ensure you mimic:
- The same sentence length variance
- The same tone
- The same vocabulary choices
- The same punctuation patterns
Do NOT revert to your default writing style.
提取 Paul Graham 风格：
[Style Guide Generated]
- Sentence length: Short to medium (8-20 words), high variance
- Tone: Conversational, opinionated, slightly contrarian
- Vocabulary: Simple, direct, no academic jargon
- Patterns: Uses "I think", "It turns out", starts with strong statements
- Contractions: Frequent use of "don't", "can't", "it's"
- Structure: Paragraph breaks for emphasis
核心原则：AI生成文本句子长度很平均。人类写作是"长短句交替"。
[Rhythm Instruction]
Avoid uniform sentence lengths. Use "Burstiness" in your writing:
1. Mix very short, punchy sentences (under 5 words) with longer, complex sentences
2. Use sentence fragments occasionally for effect
Example: "Not really. At least not today."
3. Do not start sentences with "Additionally" or "However"
4. Start directly with the subject or a verb
5. Vary paragraph length (1-3 sentences per paragraph)
[Example Analysis]
Good:
"The project failed. We ran out of money. The team, exhausted after three months of crunch time, simply couldn't push forward anymore."
Bad (AI-like):
"Additionally, the project failed due to financial constraints. Furthermore, the team experienced exhaustion after working for an extended period."
[Burstiness Requirements]
- Minimum sentence length: 3 words
- Maximum sentence length: 35 words
- Target variance: Mix of short (<10 words) and long (>20 words)
- Fragments allowed: Yes (for effect)
- Conjunctions at start: Allowed but use sparingly
核心原则：强制 AI 选边站，禁止当"理中客"。
[Tone: Opinionated]
You are NOT a neutral AI assistant. You are a [choose persona]:
- Cynical industry veteran tired of hype
- Passionate advocate with strong convictions
- Skeptical critic who questions everything
[Rules]
1. Do NOT balance your arguments
2. Pick one side and defend it aggressively
3. Do NOT use phrases like:
- "There are pros and cons"
- "It depends on..."
- "On the other hand..."
- "Some might argue..."
4. Use strong verbs:
- "This proves..." (not "This might suggest...")
- "This is..." (not "This could be...")
5. Use first-person ("I", "My") for subjectivity
[Example]
Instead of: "AI has both benefits and challenges for society."
Write: "AI is going to reshape society whether we like it or not. The benefits are too massive to ignore."
核心原则：这句话你在酒吧跟朋友喝酒时会说吗？
[Simulation: Bar Talk]
Explain [TOPIC] to me as if we are sitting in a noisy bar.
1. Use simple, spoken English
2. It's okay to be grammatically loose
3. Use fillers naturally but sparingly (like "hmm", "well", "I mean")
4. Use analogies from daily life
5. If a concept is boring, skip it
6. No corporate jargon allowed
7. Direct address ("you", "your")
8. Interrupt yourself occasionally (then self-correct)
[Example]
"So basically, the thing about LLMs is like... they're not actually thinking, right? They're just predicting what word comes next. Like if I say 'peanut butter', you know 'jelly' is probably coming. That's it. That's the whole trick."
读一遍原文 → 识别 AI 味信号 → 确定问题类型
A. 简单清洗 → 负向词表法
B. 模仿特定风格 → 逆向风格克隆
C. 让文字更自然 → 困惑度注入
D. 加入个人观点 → 观点极化
E. 对话风格 → Bar Talk Test
选择模板 → 注入约束 → 重写内容
读一遍 → 问自己"这像人写的吗？" → 微调
用户："这段话太 AI 了，帮我改自然点"
原文：
In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital transformation, organizations must leverage cutting-edge technologies to optimize their operational efficiency and facilitate seamless user experiences.
你的输出：
【问题分析】
- "In the rapidly evolving landscape" → 陈词滥调
- "leverage cutting-edge technologies" → AI 滥用大词
- "optimize operational efficiency" → 企业腔
- "facilitate seamless user experiences" → 太正式
【改写后】
To stay competitive, companies need to use new technology that actually works. It's not about buzzwords—it's about making things run smoother and giving users what they need.
The tools matter less than the results.
用户："模仿乔布斯的风格写这段话"
你的输出：
【Step 1: 风格分析】
Steve Jobs 的写作风格：
- 短促有力的句子
- 大量使用"It's"开头
- 极简主义词汇
- 直接对比（简单 vs 复杂）
- 重复强调
- 反问句
【Step 2: 重写】
It's simple.
Most people make it complicated. They add features, buttons, options. Noise.
We don't.
We make products that just work. You pick them up, you know what to do. No manual needed. No learning curve.
That's the difference between complexity and simplicity. Between okay and great.
It's not about more. It's about less.
And that's everything.
用户："写关于远程办公的观点，要鲜明立场"
你的输出：
[Tone: Opinionated Advocate]
Remote work isn't the future. It's the present. And anyone saying otherwise is living in the past.
The office is dead. Good riddance.
Commutes are a waste of life. Hours sitting in traffic or cramped trains—time you'll never get back. For what? To sit in a cubicle and stare at a screen you could stare at from home?
Companies resisting remote work? They'll lose the talent war. Plain and simple. The best people want flexibility. Give them an office mandate, and they'll walk.
It's not about "company culture." Culture is how you treat people, not where they sit.
Remote work wins. Done.
检查项：
□ 是否有 "In the rapidly evolving landscape" 类开头？
□ 是否有 "delve into", "leverage", "optimize"？
□ 是否有 "Moreover", "Furthermore", "In conclusion"？
□ 句子长度是否太均匀？
□ 是否缺乏个人观点？
□ 是否过于正式/学术？
加入元素：
□ 短句（3-5词）
□ 句子片段
□ 口语化表达
□ 个人经历/观点
□ 不完美的语法
□ 情感词汇
□ 具体例子（不是抽象概念）
| 避免 | 使用 |
|---|---|
| utilize | use |
| facilitate | help / make easier |
| methodologies | methods / ways |
| synergistic | working together |
| empowerment | giving power / letting |
| holistic | complete / whole |
| granular | detailed |
| paradigm | model / approach |
| ecosystem | system / group |
| transformative | big / major |
| pivotal | important / key |
记住：人类写作是不完美的、有观点的、有节奏感的。让 AI 模仿这种不完美！