用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/Lum1104/no-vibes --skill no-vibes命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | no-vibes |
| description | Use when completion depends on an end-to-end outcome across components, environments, or external systems. |
Treat each check as evidence for one claim, not as a substitute for the requested outcome.
Before coding—or immediately when invoked mid-task:
Keep this proportional; ignore unrelated components.
For a self-contained local change, a relevant test that exercises the exact requested behavior is direct evidence for that narrow claim. Do not invent a broader flow.
Give each material claim one status:
Evidence follows claim scope: a mocked webhook test does not prove provider delivery.
Claim the outcome complete only after end-to-end observation in an environment representative of the claim. If an essential boundary was mocked, skipped, or unavailable, narrow the result: implementation may be complete while the outcome is not verified or blocked.
Never upgrade inferred to verified or collapse a partial flow into one success.
End with a compact evidence ledger:
Outcome: <observable user result>
Verified: <checks run, environment, and observations>
Inferred: <claim and supporting reasoning>
Not verified: <unexercised parts of the critical flow>
Blocked: <blocker and remaining verification, if any>
Conclusion: <full completion or an accurately narrowed claim>
Omit empty lines, but never an unverified essential part of the flow.
For subscription cancellation, trace click → authorization → provider → webhook → entitlement → UI. If the webhook was mocked and no entitlement change was observed, mark local checks verified, that path not verified, and the flow incomplete.