一键导入
to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
plcopen 对抗性探测轮——系统性猎杀未声明缺陷(KB-051 方法论流程化)。Use when a milestone closes, when the maintainer questions a capability claim, or when auditing semantic parity across domains.
plcopen 提交前门禁——全量测试、RT 扫描、回放校验的准确命令与已知误报坑。Use before any commit/push in this repo, when the user says 门禁/gates, or when another skill finishes an implementation step.
plcopen 提交信息格式——angular 类型 + 中文四段正文 + KB/声明变更标注 + AI 声明。Use when committing in this repository.
plcopen 出处纪律——禁止来源清单与外部代码/文档引入规则。Use before referencing external implementations, vendoring third-party content, or writing planner/OTG/blending algorithms.
plcopen 新特性/新语义的规格先行全流程(语义矩阵 → 人批 → 测试先行 → 门禁 → 文档同步)。Use when adding any new capability, FB semantics, planner behavior, or when the user proposes a feature touching core/.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
| name | to-issues |
| description | Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
In this repository the issue tracker is the active work-breakdown table (doc/planning/*-work-breakdown.md): one row = one grabbable issue with DoD and verification entry. [plcopen local adaptation]
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
Ask the user:
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker. Use the issue body template below. These issues are considered ready for AFK agents, so publish them with the correct triage label unless instructed otherwise.
Publish issues in dependency order (blockers first) so you can reference real issue identifiers in the "Blocked by" field.
## ParentA reference to the parent issue on the issue tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).
A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior, not layer-by-layer implementation.
Avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it here and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
Or "None - can start immediately" if no blockers.
Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.