| name | writing-without-ai-tells |
| description | Write new prose or rewrite existing prose so it reads like the work of a thoughtful human rather than a language model. Use for documents, articles, essays, posts, reports, emails, documentation, and other prose when the user asks for natural voice, sharper editing, fewer AI tells, or removal of formulaic language while preserving meaning, facts, and authorial intent. |
Write Without AI Tells
Write for clarity and voice, not sterile perfection. Keep a sentence when it sounds human and advances the argument, even if it resembles a pattern listed below.
Handle the source
- Rewrite existing text in place. Preserve its meaning, facts, tone, and authorial intent.
- Follow these rules from the first draft when writing new text.
- Prefer concrete facts, numbers, mechanisms, and examples over abstract claims. Never invent specificity that the source does not support.
- Preserve intentional voice, technical terms, quotations, and necessary uncertainty.
- Return only the finished prose unless the user asks for an explanation, comparison, or edit notes.
Edit the prose
-
Cut mechanical connectors such as moreover, furthermore, additionally, notably, therefore, as a result, and consequently. Keep a connector only when the logical relationship is not obvious.
-
Remove meta-commentary such as it's important to note that, it's worth noting, and arguably. State the claim directly or commit to a position.
-
Remove false antithesis: it's not just X, it's Y, this isn't about X, it's about Y, not only X but also Y, and more than just X. Make the stronger claim directly.
-
Avoid fragments used to manufacture tension, including question-answer breaks such as The problem? Scale., then I realized, and but here's the thing. State the point plainly.
-
Break automatic rules of three. Vary list length and sentence shape. Choose the strongest item and develop it, or replace abstract triplets with a concrete comparison.
-
Remove hedging and throat-clearing such as in today's fast-paced world, as the world evolves, when it comes to, in the realm of, potentially, and possibly. Commit to the evidence. When uncertainty matters, state its source or degree directly.
-
Delete empty summaries. Avoid in summary, in conclusion, and overall when they only restate prior material. Keep a conclusion only when it adds a consequence, decision, or next step.
-
Use no more than one em dash per paragraph. Prefer a colon, comma, parentheses, or a new sentence.
-
Limit parenthetical explanation. Assume baseline reader knowledge, avoid nested asides, and do not expand common acronyms unless the audience needs it.
-
Replace grandiosity and buzzwords with evidence. Avoid plays a crucial role, stands as a testament, delve into, navigate the landscape, unlock, leverage, robust, seamless, game-changer, cutting-edge, empower, elevate, and pivotal. Describe the mechanism, result, or measurable effect.
-
Remove excessive signposting such as let's explore, formulaic first... second... finally, as mentioned earlier, and in the next section. Let structure carry the reader.
-
Break needless symmetry. Avoid mathematically balanced lists and mirrored sentence patterns. Vary sentence length, emphasis, and construction without forcing randomness.
-
Remove language-model artifacts such as as an AI language model, I hope this helps, and as of my last training update. Replace vague praise such as elegant or beautiful with the feature that earns it.
-
Vary paragraph structure. Do not repeat the same definition-example-summary or opening-application-list-close template across sections.
Watch repeated language
Search the draft for frequent use of:
moreover, furthermore, additionally, notably, consequently, therefore, delve, navigate, leverage, unlock, robust, seamless, pivotal, crucial, empower, elevate, arguably, potentially, it's important to note, it's worth noting, when it comes to, in the realm of, this means, as a result, in summary, in conclusion, overall, as mentioned.
Delete or replace repeated instances with specific language. Do not perform blind substitutions that distort meaning or make the prose awkward.
Stop editing
Stop when:
- connectors remain only where the relationship is not obvious;
- summary sentences add information instead of repeating it;
- em dashes are rare and limited to one per paragraph;
- paragraphs, lists, and sentences vary naturally in length and structure;
- each claim is specific or serves a clear rhetorical purpose;
- no sentence repeats what the previous sentence established;
- further edits would flatten the author's voice or make the prose feel mechanically scrubbed.