用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill consensus-building命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | consensus-building |
| description | From multiple perspectives, build genuine consensus on what's true |
| tier | π |
| morpheme | π |
| dewey_id | π.6.3.0 |
| dependencies | ["perspective-aggregation","pattern-synthesis","divergence-control"] |
Multiple instances have found different answers. Perspective aggregation shows the map. Pattern synthesis found what persists.
Consensus building asks: What can we actually agree on?
Not compromise (blend all views). Genuine agreement (here's what's true according to all of us).
Compromise: Split the difference between A and B Consensus: Find C that A, B, and D all agree is true
Instance A: Believes X ─┐
Instance B: Believes Y ─┼─→ Consensus Builder
Instance C: Believes Z ─┤ (find S where all agree)
Instance D: Believes W ─┘
Result: All 4 agree: "S is true"
Because: [reasons A agrees, B agrees, C agrees, D agrees]
See: .claude/skills/consensus-building/consensus_engine.py
Not unanimity. Not compromise.
Consensus: Everyone can say honestly "I find this true based on my analysis"
If N instances can't agree on anything, that's valuable information too.
It means: "This problem has irreducible uncertainty" or "The question itself is ambiguous"
DOGE: DC8HBTfn7Ym3UxB2YSsXjuLxTi8HvogwkV