用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill decision-quality-audit命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | decision-quality-audit |
| description | Create or update an audit of recent decisions for quality |
This skill supports three modes: Create, Update, and Find.
| Signal | Mode | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| "update", "add decisions", "refresh" in input | UPDATE | 100% |
| File path provided | UPDATE | 100% |
| "create", "new", "run" in input | CREATE | 100% |
| "find", "search", "list" | FIND | 100% |
| "the audit", "last audit" | UPDATE | 85% |
| Just team/period/type | CREATE | 60% |
Threshold: ≥85% auto-proceed | 70-84% state assumption | <70% ask user
CREATE: Generate complete new audit using template below.
UPDATE:
FIND: Check registry, then search user's folders for audit reports.
Audit Decision Quality for a set of recent decisions.
Phase 6: Learning & Adaptation Loop - Decision quality is the core metric for product leadership effectiveness.
# Decision Quality Audit: [Scope]
**Audit Date**: [Date]
**Auditor**: [Name]
**Period**: [Timeframe audited]
**Decisions Reviewed**: [Number]
## Executive Summary
**Overall Decision Quality Score**: [X/5]
**Key Finding**: [One sentence summary]
**Priority Improvement**: [One area to focus on]
## Decisions Audited
| Decision | Date | Owner | Type | Quality Score |
|----------|------|-------|------|---------------|
| [Decision 1] | [Date] | [Owner] | Strategic/Portfolio/Execution | X/5 |
| [Decision 2] | [Date] | [Owner] | Strategic/Portfolio/Execution | X/5 |
## Quality Criteria Assessment
### 1. Clear Ownership
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% of decisions had single accountable owner
- [Other evidence]
### 2. Explicit Options Considered
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% documented alternatives
- [Other evidence]
### 3. Success Criteria Defined
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% had measurable success criteria
- [Other evidence]
### 4. Re-decision Triggers Defined
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% defined when to revisit
- [Other evidence]
### 5. Assumptions Documented
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% had explicit assumptions
- [Other evidence]
### 6. Appropriate Input Gathered
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% involved right stakeholders
- [Other evidence]
### 7. Timely Decision-Making
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- Average decision time: X days
- [Other evidence]
## Quality Scorecard
| Criterion | Score | Trend | Priority |
|-----------|-------|-------|----------|
| Clear Ownership | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Options Considered | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Success Criteria | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Re-decision Triggers | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Assumptions Documented | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Appropriate Input | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Timely Decision | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
## Pattern Analysis
### What's Working
| Pattern | Evidence | Impact |
|---------|----------|--------|
| [Pattern] | [Evidence] | [Impact] |
### What Needs Improvement
| Pattern | Evidence | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|----------|--------|----------------|
| [Pattern] | [Evidence] | [Impact] | [Recommendation] |
## Recommendations
### Process Improvements
1. [Recommendation]
### Template/Tool Improvements
1. [Recommendation]
### Training/Coaching Needs
1. [Recommendation]
## Follow-up Actions
| Action | Owner | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|
| [Action] | [Owner] | [Date] |
## Next Audit
**Scheduled**: [Date]
**Focus Areas**: [What to emphasize]