| name | speckit-baseline |
| description | Generate feature specifications by analyzing existing source code. |
| allowed-tools | Bash, Read, Write, Grep, Glob |
| handoffs | [{"label":"Clarify Generated Spec","agent":"speckit.clarify","prompt":"Clarify specification requirements","send":true},{"label":"Create Implementation Plan","agent":"speckit.plan","prompt":"Create a plan for the spec. I am building with..."}] |
Spec-Kit Baseline
Generate structured feature specifications by analyzing existing source code. Reverse-engineers requirements, user stories, and success criteria from implementation.
When to Use
- Documenting existing features that lack specifications
- Understanding legacy code before refactoring
- Creating specs for inherited or acquired codebases
- Generating documentation from implemented functionality
- Preparing brownfield code for the Spec Kit workflow
Execution Workflow
The user's input after the skill invocation specifies the code to analyze. The workflow:
-
Parse target input: Identify files, directories, or patterns to analyze
- Accept file paths, glob patterns, or directory paths
- If empty: ERROR "No code target provided - specify files, directories, or patterns"
-
Discover and read source files:
- Expand glob patterns to file list
- Read file contents for analysis
- Identify primary language(s) and frameworks
- Map file relationships and dependencies
-
Analyze code structure:
- Identify entry points and public interfaces
- Extract function/method signatures and behaviors
- Find data models and entities
- Detect API endpoints and routes
- Identify user-facing functionality
-
Generate short name (2-4 words) from analyzed code:
- Use action-noun format (e.g., "user-auth", "payment-processing")
- Base on primary functionality discovered
- Preserve technical terms where meaningful
-
Check for existing branches/specs and run setup script:
- Find highest feature number for this short-name
- Run
.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json with calculated number and short-name
- Get BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths from JSON output
-
Load spec template from .specify/templates/spec-template.md
-
Generate specification content:
- User Stories: Infer from user-facing code paths and interactions
- Acceptance Scenarios: Derive from test cases, validation logic, error handling
- Functional Requirements: Extract from business logic and constraints
- Key Entities: Identify from data models and schemas
- Success Criteria: Infer from existing metrics, logging, or performance code
- Assumptions: Document inferences made during analysis
-
Abstract implementation details:
- Convert technical patterns to user-focused requirements
- Remove framework-specific terminology
- Focus on WHAT the code does, not HOW it does it
- Express behaviors in technology-agnostic terms
-
Create spec quality checklist at FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md
-
Report completion with:
- Branch name and spec file path
- Summary of analyzed files
- Key features discovered
- Areas needing clarification or review
Key Points
- Focus on extracting WHAT and WHY from HOW
- Abstract away implementation details in the generated spec
- Document assumptions made during code analysis
- Flag areas where code behavior is unclear
- Preserve discovered business rules and constraints
- Use [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] for ambiguous code sections (max 3)
- Generated specs should be validated by someone who knows the feature
Example Transformations
Code Pattern → Spec Requirement:
if (user.role === 'admin') → "System MUST restrict action to administrator users"
password.length >= 8 → "Passwords MUST be at least 8 characters"
cache.set(key, value, 3600) → "System MUST cache results for improved performance"
try { ... } catch (e) { notify(e) } → "System MUST notify users when errors occur"
Code Pattern → User Story:
- Login endpoint with OAuth → "As a user, I can sign in using my social account"
- Shopping cart logic → "As a customer, I can add items to my cart for later purchase"
- Report generation → "As an analyst, I can generate reports on system activity"
Next Steps
After generating spec.md:
- Clarify with domain experts using
speckit-clarify
- Plan modernization/refactoring with
speckit-plan
- Compare generated spec with actual requirements to identify gaps
See Also
speckit-specify - Create specs from descriptions (forward direction)
speckit-clarify - Resolve specification ambiguities
speckit-plan - Create technical implementation strategy