Skip to main content

complexity

Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

来源信息

仓库
managedcode/LlmTestServer
最近来源活动
2026年7月9日 11:53
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
1
Forks
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
5 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
complexity
description
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
compatibility
Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first.
# .NET Complexity Review ## Trigger On - the team wants to find overly complex methods - cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI - maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured ## Value - produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact - reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills - leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer ## Do Not Use For - formatting-only work - generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change ## Inputs - the nearest `AGENTS.md` - current analyzer settings - current maintainability limits ## Quick Start 1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence. ## Workflow 1. Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling. 2. Use these rules deliberately: - `CA1502` for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methods - `CA1505` for low maintainability index - `CA1506` for excessive class coupling - `CA1501` when inheritance depth is also part of the design problem 3. Keep rule severity in the root `.editorconfig`. 4. Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` added as `AdditionalFiles`. 5. Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in `AGENTS.md`. ## Bootstrap When Missing If complexity thresholds are not configured yet: 1. Detect current state: - `rg -n "CA1501|CA1502|CA1505|CA1506|CodeMetricsConfig" -g '.editorconfig' -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .` - `rg --files -g 'CodeMetricsConfig.txt'` 2. Add severity entries for `CA1502`, `CA1505`, `CA1506`, and `CA1501` in root `.editorconfig`. 3. Add checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` and include it as `AdditionalFiles` in project props. 4. Keep maintainability limits aligned with `AGENTS.md`. 5. Run `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT` and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If policy relies only on `AGENTS.md` limits with no analyzer gate by design, return `status: not_applicable`. ## Deliver - explicit complexity and maintainability policy - checked-in metric thresholds - CI commands that surface complex methods early ## Validate - method-complexity checks are enabled where the repo wants them - thresholds are versioned in repo, not held in IDE memory - complexity findings map to real refactoring decisions ## Ralph Loop Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work. 1. Plan first (mandatory): - analyze current state - define target outcome, constraints, and risks - write a detailed execution plan - list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason 2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path. ### Required Result Format - `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked` - `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step - `actions_taken`: concrete changes made - `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons - `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary - `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none` For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands. ## Load References - [references/complexity.md](references/complexity.md) - [references/metrics.md](references/metrics.md) - [references/config.md](references/config.md) ## Example Requests - "Which analyzer finds complex methods in .NET?" - "Add a complexity gate for our C# code." - "Configure cyclomatic complexity thresholds."
在 GitHub 查看