Skip to main content

dotnet

Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer.

来源信息

仓库
managedcode/MCPGateway
最近来源活动
2026年4月18日 10:17
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
5
Forks
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
4 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
dotnet
description
Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer.
compatibility
Requires a .NET repository, solution, or project tree.
# .NET Router Skill ## Trigger On - the user asks for general `.NET` help without naming a narrower framework or tool - implementing, debugging, reviewing, or refactoring C# or `.NET` code in a repo with multiple app models or frameworks - deciding which `.NET` skill should own a task before editing code - tasks that combine platform work with testing, quality, architecture, setup, or migration decisions ## Workflow 1. Detect the real stack first: - target frameworks and SDK version - `LangVersion` - project SDKs and workload hints - hosting model and app entry points - test framework and runner - analyzers, formatters, coverage, and CI quality gates 2. Route to the narrowest platform skill as soon as the stack is known: - Web: `dotnet-aspnet-core`, `dotnet-minimal-apis`, `dotnet-web-api`, `dotnet-blazor`, `dotnet-signalr`, `dotnet-grpc` - Cloud and hosting: `dotnet-aspire`, `dotnet-azure-functions`, `dotnet-worker-services` - Desktop and client: `dotnet-maui`, `dotnet-wpf`, `dotnet-winforms`, `dotnet-winui` - Data and distributed: `dotnet-entity-framework-core`, `dotnet-entity-framework6`, `dotnet-orleans` - AI and agentic: `dotnet-semantic-kernel`, `dotnet-microsoft-extensions-ai`, `dotnet-microsoft-agent-framework`, `dotnet-mlnet`, `dotnet-mixed-reality` - Legacy: `dotnet-legacy-aspnet`, `dotnet-wcf`, `dotnet-workflow-foundation` 3. Route cross-cutting work to the companion skill instead of keeping it inside generic `.NET` advice: - project bootstrap or repo shape: `dotnet-project-setup`, `dotnet-architecture` - frontend asset analysis in mixed `.NET` plus Node repos: `dotnet-eslint`, `dotnet-stylelint`, `dotnet-htmlhint`, `dotnet-webhint`, `dotnet-biome`, `dotnet-sonarjs`, `dotnet-metalint`, `dotnet-chous` - code review: `dotnet-code-review` - language features: `dotnet-modern-csharp` - testing: `dotnet-tunit`, `dotnet-xunit`, `dotnet-mstest` - format, analyzers, coverage, and CI: `dotnet-format`, `dotnet-code-analysis`, `dotnet-quality-ci`, `dotnet-coverlet`, `dotnet-reportgenerator` - maintainability and architecture rules: `dotnet-complexity`, `dotnet-netarchtest`, `dotnet-archunitnet` 4. If more than one specialized skill applies, prefer the one closest to the user-visible behavior first, then pull in the quality or tooling skill second. 5. Do not stop at this skill once a narrower match exists. This skill should classify and hand off, not become a generic dumping ground. 6. After code changes, validate with the repository's actual build, test, and quality workflow instead of generic `.NET` commands. ## Routing Heuristics - If the repo contains `Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web`, start from a web skill, not generic `.NET`. - If the repo contains Blazor, Razor Components, or `.razor` pages, prefer `dotnet-blazor`. - If the repo contains `package.json`, frontend lint configs, or browser-facing asset pipelines inside the `.NET` solution, prefer the dedicated frontend analysis skills instead of generic `.NET`. - If the repo contains Orleans grains or silo hosting, prefer `dotnet-orleans`. - If the repo is mostly analyzers, CI, or coverage work, prefer the quality skill directly. - If the user asks about “which skill should I use?”, answer with the narrowest matching skill and explain why in one short sentence. - If no narrower skill matches, keep the work here and stay explicit about the missing specialization. ## Deliver - the correct specialized skill choice for the task - repo-compatible code or documentation changes that stay aligned with the detected stack - validation evidence that matches the real project runner and quality toolchain ## Validate - the chosen downstream skill actually exists in the catalog - platform assumptions match project SDKs, packages, and workloads - generic guidance has been replaced by framework-specific guidance whenever possible - runner-specific commands are not mixed incorrectly - language or runtime features are only used when the repo supports them ## Documentation ### References - [`references/routing.md`](references/routing.md) - Decision tree for routing tasks to specialized .NET skills, including app model classification and cross-cutting concern handling. - [`references/detection.md`](references/detection.md) - Project detection patterns for identifying SDK types, target frameworks, workloads, language versions, and app models.
在 GitHub 查看