| name | review |
| description | Review uncommitted code changes to find unreasonable design, unfinished requirements, potential bugs, missed reuse opportunities, and optimization opportunities. Use when the user asks for a review of pending, uncommitted, or unpublished code changes and expects both findings and concrete improvements. |
Review
Inspect the current working tree before making assumptions. Start with git status --short, then read the relevant diff.
Prioritize findings over summaries. Report the highest-impact issues first with precise file references and concrete impact.
Check these areas on every run:
- Find unreasonable or fragile design choices.
- Find unfinished requirements or behavior gaps.
- Find potential bugs, regressions, and edge-case failures.
- Find duplicated logic or places where existing code should have been reused.
- Find missing validation, verification, or tests.
When the user expects action instead of commentary, fix the issues you identify and re-check the result.
When reviewing, keep the response structure tight:
- List findings first, ordered by severity.
- Add open questions or assumptions only if they materially affect correctness.
- Add a short change summary only after the findings or fixes.
When no issues are found, say so explicitly and still mention residual risks or missing verification.
